Literature DB >> 30840517

The Effects of Augmented Feedback on Sprint, Jump, and Strength Adaptations in Rugby Union Players After a 4-Week Training Program.

Jonathon Weakley, Kevin Till, John Sampson, Harry Banyard, Cedric Leduc, Kyle Wilson, Greg Roe, Ben Jones.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Feedback can enhance acute physical performance. However, its effects on physical adaptation have received little attention. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the effect of feedback during a 4-wk training program on jump, sprint, and strength adaptations.
METHODS: A total of 28 semiprofessional male rugby union players were strength-matched into 2 groups (feedback and nonfeedback). During the 4-wk training program, the Feedback group received immediate, objective feedback on (1) mean concentric velocity during resistance training repetitions, (2) distance feedback for standing broad jumps, and (3) time for sprints. The Nonfeedback group was not provided additional information. Across the 4-wk mesocycle, subjects completed 3 strength and conditioning sessions per week. Countermovement jump, standing long jump, 10- and 20-m sprint, and 3-repetition-maximum barbell back squat and bench press were measured before and after the training intervention. Magnitude-based inferences assessed meaningful changes within and between groups.
RESULTS: The Feedback group showed small to moderate improvements in outcome measures, whereas the Nonfeedback group demonstrated trivial to small improvements. Improvements in countermovement-jump relative peak power (effect size ± 90% confidence limits: 0.34 ± 0.42), 10-m (0.20 ± 0.35) and 20-m sprints (0.40 ± 0.21), and 3-repetition-maximum back squats (0.23 ± 0.17) were possibly to likely greater for the Feedback condition than for Nonfeedback.
CONCLUSIONS: Providing augmented feedback during strength and conditioning routines can enhance training adaptations compared with athletes who do not receive feedback. Consequently, practitioners should consider providing kinematic outputs, displacement, or sprint time at the completion of each repetition as athletes train.

Keywords:  countermovement jump; power; speed; strength and conditioning

Year:  2019        PMID: 30840517     DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Physiol Perform        ISSN: 1555-0265            Impact factor:   4.010


  4 in total

1.  The Validity and Reliability of Commercially Available Resistance Training Monitoring Devices: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jonathon Weakley; Matthew Morrison; Amador García-Ramos; Rich Johnston; Lachlan James; Michael H Cole
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Punch Trackers: Correct Recognition Depends on Punch Type and Training Experience.

Authors:  Dan Omcirk; Tomas Vetrovsky; Jan Padecky; Sophie Vanbelle; Jan Malecek; James J Tufano
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Velocity Loss Thresholds Reliably Control Kinetic and Kinematic Outputs during Free Weight Resistance Training.

Authors:  Madison Pearson; Amador García-Ramos; Matthew Morrison; Carlos Ramirez-Lopez; Nicholas Dalton-Barron; Jonathon Weakley
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Effects of velocity based training vs. traditional 1RM percentage-based training on improving strength, jump, linear sprint and change of direction speed performance: A Systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kai-Fang Liao; Xin-Xin Wang; Meng-Yuan Han; Lin-Long Li; George P Nassis; Yong-Ming Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.