Literature DB >> 30838521

Right upper lobe anatomy revisited: a computed tomography scan study.

Jean S Bussières1,2, Michel Gingras3, Lindsay Perron4, Jacques Somma5, Marili Frenette6, Etienne J Couture6, Olivier Moreault6, Yves Lacasse7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The double lumen tube (DLT) has become the most popular way to isolate the lungs for thoracic surgery. The variable anatomy of the right main stem bronchus (RMSB) seems to be the main reason clinicians are unwilling to use the right-sided DLT (R-DLT). The factors that could compromise the adequate ventilation of the right lung are mostly the variable length of the RMSB and the misalignment of the lateral orifice of the R-DLT in regard to the right upper lobe bronchus (RULB). The objectives of this study were to validate an alternative method to estimate the RMSB length, and to determine the distribution of the angulation of the ostium of the RULB.
METHODS: From high-resolution computed tomography scans of the thorax of 106 consecutive patients, the length of the RMSB was measured using Kim's method and the carina-to-carina method. The angle between the RULB origin and the lateral aspect of the RMSB was also measured. All these measurements were correlated and inter-observer variation documented.
RESULTS: From the Kim's method, the mean (standard deviation [SD]) length of the RMSB was 25.5 (4.7) mm. From the alternative carina-to-carina method, the mean (SD) length of RMSB was 29.4 (4.6) mm. The inter-observer agreement was substantial with both methods (Kim's method: intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.84; carina-to-carina method: ICC = 0.95). Both measures were closely related (ICC = 0.93; P < 0.001). The RULB presented a wide range angulation [mean (SD), 0.1 (9.5)°; range, -28.6 to 21.2].
CONCLUSION: These anatomic observations provide a better understanding of the variable anatomy of the right bronchial tree and may guide thoracic anesthesiologists in the choice of the best lung isolation device for their patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30838521     DOI: 10.1007/s12630-019-01342-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  6 in total

1.  Dimensions & shape of the trachea in the neonates, children & adults in northwest India.

Authors:  H Jit; I Jit
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Methods of lung separation.

Authors:  Edmond Cohen
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.706

3.  The distance between the carina and the distal margin of the right upper lobe orifice measured by computerised tomography as a guide to right-sided double-lumen endobronchial tube use.

Authors:  J H Kim; S H Park; S H Han; F S Nahm; C K Jung; K M Kim
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 6.955

Review 4.  How to choose the double-lumen tube size and side: the eternal debate.

Authors:  Alessia Pedoto
Journal:  Anesthesiol Clin       Date:  2012-12

5.  Margin of safety in positioning modern double-lumen endotracheal tubes.

Authors:  J L Benumof; B L Partridge; C Salvatierra; J Keating
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Modified right-sided Broncho-Cath double lumen tube improves endobronchial positioning: a randomized study.

Authors:  Jean S Bussières; Yves Lacasse; Dany Côté; Michel Beauvais; Sophie St-Onge; Jérôme Lemieux; Julie Soucy
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.063

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Anatomy of the right upper lobe revisited and clinical considerations in Chinese population.

Authors:  Yan Chen; Ying Guo; Weidong Mi; Changsheng Zhang; Hong Wang; Dexu Zhao; Jiangbei Cao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Comparison of the accuracy of three methods measured the length of the right main stem bronchus by chest computed tomography as a guide to the use of right sided double-lumen tube.

Authors:  Zhuo Liu; Meiqi Liu; Li Zhao; Xiaohang Qi; Yang Yu; Shujuan Liang; Xiaochun Yang; Zhongfeng Ma
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 2.376

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.