Literature DB >> 30838460

Dissolution Edge Charts for Immediate Release Products and Their Applications: a Simulation Study to Aid the Setting of Specifications.

John Z Duan1.   

Abstract

One of the most commonly used methods to establish the clinical relevance of dissolution is to align the dissolution specifications with pivotal clinical batches. The objective of the study was to create edge charts for the dissolution of immediate release (IR) drug products to quantitatively establish the bases for setting clinically relevant and discriminating dissolution specifications and to clarify which stage in the US Pharmacopoeia (USP) <711> acceptance tables should be targeted. The simulations of dissolution data were performed on a batch of IR products with 1,000,000 units. The desired acceptance criterion was Q = 80% of the label claim at 30 min. A total of 110 scenarios for IR data were generated, which included various combinations of two determinants: the batch mean and SD (standard deviation). For each scenario, the dissolution data were tested based on USP three-stage procedures to determine the pass/fail at each stage. This process was repeated 10,000 times. The failure rate at each stage for each scenario was calculated as the percentage of failed replicates across 10,000 trials. Contour plots, named edge charts, were created to demonstrate the relationship between the dissolution failure rates and the two determinants (mean and SD). The edge lines represent the failure rates for the given combinations of the mean and SD. The edge charts can provide a quantitative estimate based on the observed dissolution data and provide fundamental support for recommendations on using USP stage 2 as a target for setting the acceptance limit(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  dissolution; dissolution specification; edge charts; simulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30838460     DOI: 10.1208/s12248-019-0308-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  8 in total

1.  A survey of the quality of generic clarithromycin products from 18 countries.

Authors:  C H Nightingale
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.859

2.  In vivo bioequivalence and in vitro similarity factor (f2) for dissolution profile comparisons of extended release formulations: how and when do they match?

Authors:  John Z Duan; Kareen Riviere; Patrick Marroum
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Approaches for Establishing Clinically Relevant Dissolution Specifications for Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms.

Authors:  Andre Hermans; Andreas M Abend; Filippos Kesisoglou; Talia Flanagan; Michael J Cohen; Dorys A Diaz; Y Mao; Limin Zhang; Gregory K Webster; Yiqing Lin; David A Hahn; Carrie A Coutant; Haiyan Grady
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Quality of anthelminthic medicines available in Jimma Ethiopia.

Authors:  Sileshi Belew; Sultan Suleman; Evelien Wynendaele; Matthias D'Hondt; Anne Kosgei; Luc Duchateau; Bart De Spiegeleer
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 3.112

5.  Evaluation of the physicochemical equivalence of three brands of commercially available quinine sulphate tablets from South Western part of Nigeria.

Authors:  Ai Adegbite; O M Adegbolagun
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 0.927

6.  Report: in vitro dissolution studies of different brands of sustained release diclofenac sodium matrix tablet available in Bangladesh.

Authors:  M D Addnan Abdullah; Sukumar Bepary; Abu Shara Shamsur Rouf
Journal:  Pak J Pharm Sci       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 0.684

Review 7.  Scientific and Regulatory Considerations in Solid Oral Modified Release Drug Product Development.

Authors:  Min Li; Sanna Sander; John Duan; Susan Rosencrance; Sarah Pope Miksinski; Lawrence Yu; Paul Seo; Bhagwant Rege
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.009

8.  Pharmaceutical quality of seven generic Levodopa/Benserazide products compared with original Madopar® / Prolopa®.

Authors:  Urs E Gasser; Anton Fischer; Jan P Timmermans; Isabelle Arnet
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 2.483

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.