| Literature DB >> 30837959 |
Karol Gliniewicz1,2, G Maria Schneider1,2, Benjamin J Ridenhour1, Christopher J Williams3, Yuli Song4, Miranda A Farage4, Kenneth Miller4, Larry J Forney1,2.
Abstract
For decades hormone therapy (HT) has been prescribed to treat the symptoms of menopause, such as vaginal dryness, itching and burning. Here we sought to compare the vaginal microbiomes of postmenopausal women who received low dose estrogen therapy to those of premenopausal and postmenopausal women, and to do so in conjunction with assessing the alleviation of symptoms associated with vaginal atrophy. In this study vaginal swab samples were obtained from 45 women who were classified as either premenopausal, postmenopausal, or postmenopausal and undergoing HT. The vaginal microbiomes of these women were characterized by 16S rRNA gene sequencing and bacterial abundances were quantified by qPCR. We found that the vaginal communities from our cohort could be divided into six clusters (A-F) based on differences in the composition and relative abundances of bacterial taxa. Communities in cluster A were dominated by Lactobacillus crispatus, and those of cluster B were dominated by Gardnerella vaginalis. Communities in cluster C had high proportions of L. iners, while those in cluster D were more even and included several co-dominant taxa. Communities in clusters E and F were dominated by Bifidobacterium and L. gasseri, respectively. The vaginal communities of most postmenopausal women receiving HT (10/15) were dominated by species of lactobacilli and belonged to clusters A, C, and F (P < 0.001). This sharply contrasts with vaginal communities of postmenopausal women without HT, most of which (10/15) were in cluster D, depleted of lactobacilli, and had about 10-fold fewer total bacteria (P < 0.05). The vaginal communities of women in each study group differed in terms of the dominant bacterial species composition and relative abundance. Those of postmenopausal women receiving HT significantly differed from those of postmenopausal women without HT and were most often dominated by species of Lactobacillus. Noteworthy, HT greatly improved vaginal atrophy scores, decreased vaginal pH, and significantly increased bacterial numbers in comparison to postmenopausal women not receiving HT.Entities:
Keywords: hormone replacement therapy; menopause; microbial community structure and function; premenopause; vaginal atrophy; vaginal microbiome
Year: 2019 PMID: 30837959 PMCID: PMC6382698 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00193
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1Cluster analysis of vaginal bacterial communities found in 45 women who were either premenopausal, postmenopausal, or postmenopausal and receiving hormone replacement therapy. The dendrogram was created as described in the Materials and Methods section. The number of clusters within the data was determined by maximizing the silhouette width as described by Rousseeuw (1987).
FIGURE 2Principle components analysis of vaginal bacterial communities found in 45 women who were either premenopausal, postmenopausal, or postmenopausal and receiving hormone replacement therapy.
FIGURE 3(A) Stacked bar chart showing the predominant taxa that comprised >10% (on average) of communities in at least one cluster. The number of women in each cluster is shown above each bar, and the identity of the taxa are shown in the key on the right of the graph. (B) Number of women in clusters A–F in the three treatment groups. One group (PRE) included only premenopausal women with a vaginal pH ≤ 5 and vaginal atrophy score ≤2. The second group (POST) included only postmenopausal women with a vaginal pH ≥ 5 and vaginal atrophy score ≥6, while the third group (POST+H) included postmenopausal women undergoing hormone replacement therapy who had a vaginal pH ≤ 5 and a vaginal atrophy score ≤2.
FIGURE 4Average 16S rRNA gene copy number in samples of women in the three treatment groups. One group (PRE) included only premenopausal women with a vaginal pH ≤ 5 and vaginal atrophy score ≤2. The second group (POST) included only postmenopausal women with a vaginal pH ≥ 5 and vaginal atrophy score ≥6, while the third group (POST+H) included postmenopausal women undergoing hormone replacement therapy who had a vaginal pH ≤ 5 and a vaginal atrophy score ≤2. Asterisk denotes statistically significant difference (P < 0.05), medians are indicated by thicker lines within the bar graph for each group of women.
Pairwise comparison of clusters based on different physiological and biochemical factors.
| Variable | Pairwise differences ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Histamine (labia majora) | 0.04 | B > D (0.09) |
| Histamine (labia minora) | 0.04 | B > D (0.03) |
| Histidine:Histamine (labia majora) | 0.05 | |
| Histidine:Histamine (labia minora) | 0.08 | D > B (0.09) |
| IL-1rα:IL-1α (labia minora) | 0.01 | A > D (0.01); B > D (0.01); D > C (0.005) |
| Vaginal atrophy | <0.001 | D > A (<0.001); D > B (<0.001); D > C (0.005) |
| Vaginal pH (mid-vagina) | <0.001 | B > A (0.02); B > C (0.1); D > A (<0.001); D > B (<0.001); D > C (<0.001) |
| Vaginal pH (labia minora) | 0.02 | D > A (0.01) |