Wenfeng Cheng1, Chuanan Shen2, Dongxu Zhao3, Hongyan Zhang4, Jiajin Tu5, Zhiqiang Yuan6, Guodong Song7, Miao Liu8, Dawei Li3, Yuru Shang3, Binyu Qin1. 1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China. 2. Department of Burns & Plastic Surgery, The Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China. Electronic address: scaburn@sohu.com. 3. Department of Burns & Plastic Surgery, The Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China. 4. Department of Burns, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China. 5. Department of Burns, Ganzhou Municipal Hospital of Jiangxi Province, Ganzhou, China. 6. Institute of Burn Research, Southwest Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China. 7. Department of Burns, Affiliated Jinan Central Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China. 8. Department of Epidemiology, Institute of Geriatrics, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Epidemiological features of massively burned patients in China remains unclear. This study was designed to investigate the epidemiological characteristics and evaluate the burn index (BI) and other risk factors associated with the prognosis of massively burned patients. METHODS: Data of patients with ≥30% total body surface area burned admitted in 2014 were retrieved from 106 burn centers in the mainland of China. Information of epidemiological features and the outcome were collected for retrospective analysis. RESULTS: A total of 2483 massively burned patients were included in this study, with a male-to-female ratio of 2.29:1, the mean age of 49.23±16.67 years, mean TBSA of 55.53±21.39% and the mean BI of 39.75±21.59. Scald accounted for 81.07% of the injuries in children, while flame accounted for 66.89% and 74.31% of the injuries in adults and seniors. Approximately 17.76% of the patients were admitted to the local burn center after 6h of injury, and the wound areas of 1154 (46.48%) patients were covered with folk remedies. The mortality was 9.79%, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for BI was 0.941 (95% CI, 0.929-0.954). When the value of BI was above a threshold of 29 in the 0-14 years age group, 43.5 in the 15-59 years age group and 35.5 in the 60 years or older age group, the mortality increased significantly. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that the odds ratio (OR) of death increased 6% with an increase in the BI of 1.0. Patients older than 60 years, the admission time longer than 6h after-injury (adjusted OR, 1.797; 95% CI, 1.179-2.740; adjusted p<0.001), and patients with a combined inhalation injury (adjusted OR, 6.649; 95% CI, 4.517-9.789; adjusted p<0.000), were at higher risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: There are etiological characteristics of the different age groups that should be considered for prevention. BI can be a reliable index of prognosis in severely burned patients. The results of the study showed that a large BI, elderly age, delayed admission after injury and combined inhalation injury are the main risk factors for extensively burned patients.
OBJECTIVE: Epidemiological features of massively burned patients in China remains unclear. This study was designed to investigate the epidemiological characteristics and evaluate the burn index (BI) and other risk factors associated with the prognosis of massively burned patients. METHODS: Data of patients with ≥30% total body surface area burned admitted in 2014 were retrieved from 106 burn centers in the mainland of China. Information of epidemiological features and the outcome were collected for retrospective analysis. RESULTS: A total of 2483 massively burned patients were included in this study, with a male-to-female ratio of 2.29:1, the mean age of 49.23±16.67 years, mean TBSA of 55.53±21.39% and the mean BI of 39.75±21.59. Scald accounted for 81.07% of the injuries in children, while flame accounted for 66.89% and 74.31% of the injuries in adults and seniors. Approximately 17.76% of the patients were admitted to the local burn center after 6h of injury, and the wound areas of 1154 (46.48%) patients were covered with folk remedies. The mortality was 9.79%, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for BI was 0.941 (95% CI, 0.929-0.954). When the value of BI was above a threshold of 29 in the 0-14 years age group, 43.5 in the 15-59 years age group and 35.5 in the 60 years or older age group, the mortality increased significantly. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that the odds ratio (OR) of death increased 6% with an increase in the BI of 1.0. Patients older than 60 years, the admission time longer than 6h after-injury (adjusted OR, 1.797; 95% CI, 1.179-2.740; adjusted p<0.001), and patients with a combined inhalation injury (adjusted OR, 6.649; 95% CI, 4.517-9.789; adjusted p<0.000), were at higher risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: There are etiological characteristics of the different age groups that should be considered for prevention. BI can be a reliable index of prognosis in severely burned patients. The results of the study showed that a large BI, elderly age, delayed admission after injury and combined inhalation injury are the main risk factors for extensively burned patients.