Literature DB >> 30836345

EEG decoding of the target speaker in a cocktail party scenario: considerations regarding dynamic switching of talker location.

Emily S Teoh1, Edmund C Lalor.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: It has been shown that attentional selection in a simple dichotic listening paradigm can be decoded offline by reconstructing the stimulus envelope from single-trial neural response data. Here, we test the efficacy of this approach in an environment with non-stationary talkers. We then look beyond the envelope reconstructions themselves and consider whether incorporating the decoder values-which reflect the weightings applied to the multichannel EEG data at different time lags and scalp locations when reconstructing the stimulus envelope-can improve decoding performance. APPROACH: High-density EEG was recorded as subjects attended to one of two talkers. The two speech streams were filtered using HRTFs, and the talkers were alternated between the left and right locations at varying intervals to simulate a dynamic environment. We trained spatio-temporal decoders mapping from EEG data to the attended and unattended stimulus envelopes. We then decoded auditory attention by (1) using the attended decoder to reconstruct the envelope and (2) exploiting the fact that decoder weightings themselves contain signatures of attention, resulting in consistent patterns across subjects that can be classified. MAIN
RESULTS: The previously established decoding approach was found to be effective even with non-stationary talkers. Signatures of attentional selection and attended direction were found in the spatio-temporal structure of the decoders and were consistent across subjects. The inclusion of decoder weights into the decoding algorithm resulted in significantly improved decoding accuracies (from 61.07% to 65.31% for 4 s windows). An attempt was made to include alpha power lateralization as another feature to improve decoding, although this was unsuccessful at the single-trial level. SIGNIFICANCE: This work suggests that the spatial-temporal decoder weights can be utilised to improve decoding. More generally, looking beyond envelope reconstruction and incorporating other signatures of attention is an avenue that should be explored to improve selective auditory attention decoding.

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30836345     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab0cf1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  7 in total

1.  Neurofeedback Training of Auditory Selective Attention Enhances Speech-In-Noise Perception.

Authors:  Subong Kim; Caroline Emory; Inyong Choi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  A Speech-Level-Based Segmented Model to Decode the Dynamic Auditory Attention States in the Competing Speaker Scenes.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Yihan Wang; Zhixing Liu; Ed X Wu; Fei Chen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  Attention Differentially Affects Acoustic and Phonetic Feature Encoding in a Multispeaker Environment.

Authors:  Emily S Teoh; Farhin Ahmed; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Behavioral Account of Attended Stream Enhances Neural Tracking.

Authors:  Moïra-Phoebé Huet; Christophe Micheyl; Etienne Parizet; Etienne Gaudrain
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  EEG alpha and pupil diameter reflect endogenous auditory attention switching and listening effort.

Authors:  Stephanie Haro; Hrishikesh M Rao; Thomas F Quatieri; Christopher J Smalt
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.698

6.  Including Measures of High Gamma Power Can Improve the Decoding of Natural Speech From EEG.

Authors:  Shyanthony R Synigal; Emily S Teoh; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Neural attentional-filter mechanisms of listening success in middle-aged and older individuals.

Authors:  Sarah Tune; Mohsen Alavash; Lorenz Fiedler; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 14.919

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.