Literature DB >> 30836280

Main and side stream effects of electronic cigarettes.

E Papaefstathiou1, M Stylianou2, A Agapiou3.   

Abstract

Over the last decade there has been a significant boost towards the use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes), especially among youth. Different concentrations of propylene glycol (PG) or vegetable glycerin (VG), flavors and nicotine are mixed in plastic cartridges and commercially offered or privately produced by the vapers. During vaping, a mixture of air and vapors is inhaled to the lungs. Since the ingredients of the e-cigarettes are not burned but vaporized (heated), fewer chemicals are emitted. The levels of potentially toxic compounds (e.g. volatile organic compounds (VOCs), particulate matter (PM), metals, radicals, nitrosamines, etc.) emitted from vaping appear to be lower compared to that of tobacco smoking (from combustible cigarettes). Nevertheless, measurable toxic elements and VOCs are still released (e.g. acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, acrolein, benzene, etc.) along with other volatiles associated with e-liquid flavoring and device variability with PG and VG. The wide range of available flavors at various purities along with the heating temperature are important parameters affecting the evolution of VOCs and aerosols. There is lack of standardized short- and long-term epidemiological medical data (chronic exposure) on e-cigarettes effects to users, non-users and the human micro-environment (second- or third-hand exposure). Therefore, the potential health, safety and environmental effects of vaping are reviewed, examined and discussed.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  E-cigarette; Environmental impact assessment; GC-MS; VOCs; Vaping

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30836280     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  4 in total

Review 1.  Inhalation Toxicology of Vaping Products and Implications for Pulmonary Health.

Authors:  Hussein Traboulsi; Mathew Cherian; Mira Abou Rjeili; Matthew Preteroti; Jean Bourbeau; Benjamin M Smith; David H Eidelman; Carolyn J Baglole
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Comparative Indoor Pollution from Glo, Iqos, and Juul, Using Traditional Combustion Cigarettes as Benchmark: Evidence from the Randomized SUR-VAPES AIR Trial.

Authors:  Mariangela Peruzzi; Elena Cavarretta; Giacomo Frati; Roberto Carnevale; Fabio Miraldi; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Sebastiano Sciarretta; Francesco Versaci; Vittoria Cammalleri; Pasquale Avino; Carmela Protano; Matteo Vitali
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 3.  Analytical methods for the identification of micro/nano metals in e-cigarette emission samples: a review.

Authors:  Wafaa Waleed Al-Qaysi; Fatma H Abdulla
Journal:  Chem Zvesti       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Nicotine formulations impact reinforcement-related behaviors in a mouse model of vapor self-administration.

Authors:  Brandon J Henderson; Skylar Y Cooper
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 4.852

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.