Literature DB >> 30836031

Cost-effectiveness of second-line atezolizumab in Canada for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Umang Ondhia1, H J Conter2,3, Scott Owen4, Anna Zhou5, Julian Nam1, Sumeet Singh5, Ahmed Abdulla6, Paula Chu6, Federico Felizzi6, Noman Paracha6, Randeep Sangha7.   

Abstract

Aim: To assess the cost-effectiveness in Canada of atezolizumab compared with docetaxel or nivolumab for the treatment of advanced NSCLC after first-line platinum-doublet chemotherapy. Materials and methods: A three-state partitioned-survival model was developed. Clinical inputs were obtained from the phase III OAK trial comparing atezolizumab with docetaxel in patients with advanced NSCLC who progressed after first-line platinum-doublet chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were extrapolated beyond the trial period using parametric models. A cure model assuming a 1% cure fraction was fitted to the OS data for atezolizumab. Outcomes for nivolumab were informed by a network meta-analysis (NMA) vs atezolizumab. Resource use and costs were informed by clinical expert opinion and published Canadian sources. Utility values were obtained from the OAK trial. The perspective of the analysis was that of the Canadian publicly-funded healthcare system. The base case time horizon was 10 years, and the discount rate was 1.5% annually for both costs and effects. Scenario analyses were performed to test the robustness of the results and all analyses were performed probabilistically.
Results: Atezolizumab demonstrated a quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gain of 0.60 compared with docetaxel at an incremental cost of $85,073, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $142,074/QALY. Atezolizumab dominated nivolumab (regardless of dosing regimen), based on modest differences in both QALYs and costs. Docetaxel was most likely to be cost effective at willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds below $125,000/QALY gained, while atezolizumab was most likely to be cost effective beyond this WTP threshold. In most scenario analyses, the results remained robust to changes in parameters. A reduced time horizon and alternative approaches to the NMA had the greatest impact on cost-effectiveness results.
Conclusion: Atezolizumab represents a cost-effective therapeutic option in Canada for the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC who progress after first-line platinum doublet chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  D61; H51; I18; NSCLC; cost-effectiveness; immunotherapy; oncology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30836031     DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1590842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Econ        ISSN: 1369-6998            Impact factor:   2.448


  8 in total

1.  The Use of Expert Elicitation among Computational Modeling Studies in Health Research: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Christopher J Cadham; Marie Knoll; Luz María Sánchez-Romero; K Michael Cummings; Clifford E Douglas; Alex Liber; David Mendez; Rafael Meza; Ritesh Mistry; Aylin Sertkaya; Nargiz Travis; David T Levy
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 2.749

2.  A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Licensed Drugs Used for Previously Treated Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) and Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Negative Advanced/Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Daniel Gallacher; Peter Auguste; Pamela Royle; Hema Mistry; Xavier Armoiry
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 3.  Economic Evaluations of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Na Li; Huanrui Zheng; Bin Zheng; Chaoxin Chen; Hongfu Cai; Maobai Liu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 3.989

4.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of atezolizumab in advanced triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Lee Cheng Phua; Soo Chin Lee; Kwong Ng; Mohamed Ismail Abdul Aziz
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Cost-effectiveness of Nivolumab-Ipilimumab Combination Therapy for the Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  P Travis Courtney; Anthony T Yip; Daniel R Cherry; Mia A Salans; Abhishek Kumar; James D Murphy
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-05-03

6.  Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness Profile of Second-Line Treatments with Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab and Atezolizumab in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Matteo Franchi; Giacomo Pellegrini; Giovanni Corrao
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-18

7.  The Predictive Value of PD-L1 Expression Level in Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of Atezolizumab/Pembrolizumab.

Authors:  Shen Lin; Yiyuan Li; Dian Gu; Shaohong Luo; Xiaoting Huang; Liangliang Dong; Xiongwei Xu; Peili Lin; Xiuhua Weng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 5.738

8.  Immunotherapy: From Advanced NSCLC to Early Stages, an Evolving Concept.

Authors:  Thierry Berghmans; Valérie Durieux; Lizza E L Hendriks; Anne-Marie Dingemans
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-03-24
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.