| Literature DB >> 30836031 |
Umang Ondhia1, H J Conter2,3, Scott Owen4, Anna Zhou5, Julian Nam1, Sumeet Singh5, Ahmed Abdulla6, Paula Chu6, Federico Felizzi6, Noman Paracha6, Randeep Sangha7.
Abstract
Aim: To assess the cost-effectiveness in Canada of atezolizumab compared with docetaxel or nivolumab for the treatment of advanced NSCLC after first-line platinum-doublet chemotherapy. Materials and methods: A three-state partitioned-survival model was developed. Clinical inputs were obtained from the phase III OAK trial comparing atezolizumab with docetaxel in patients with advanced NSCLC who progressed after first-line platinum-doublet chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were extrapolated beyond the trial period using parametric models. A cure model assuming a 1% cure fraction was fitted to the OS data for atezolizumab. Outcomes for nivolumab were informed by a network meta-analysis (NMA) vs atezolizumab. Resource use and costs were informed by clinical expert opinion and published Canadian sources. Utility values were obtained from the OAK trial. The perspective of the analysis was that of the Canadian publicly-funded healthcare system. The base case time horizon was 10 years, and the discount rate was 1.5% annually for both costs and effects. Scenario analyses were performed to test the robustness of the results and all analyses were performed probabilistically.Entities:
Keywords: D61; H51; I18; NSCLC; cost-effectiveness; immunotherapy; oncology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30836031 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1590842
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Econ ISSN: 1369-6998 Impact factor: 2.448