| Literature DB >> 30835587 |
Jin Li1,2, Tongjie Cheng1, Qiang Tian3, Ying Cheng1, Lixia Zhao4, Xingzhen Zhang5, Yi Qu1.
Abstract
As a leading cause of vision impairment of the retina, macular edema (ME) has one of the highest clinical demands for treatment. Current treatment of ME relies heavily on invasive techniques resulting in complications and poor patient compliance. To enhance the efficiency of triamcinolone acetonide as eye drop to the posterior segment of the eye, we developed and characterized a novel formulation, namely, triamcinolone acetonide chitosan-coated liposomes (TA-CHL), prepared by the calcium acetate gradient method with some modifications. TA-CHL provided the mean particle size of 135.46 ± 4.49 nm and high entrapment efficiency (90.66 ± 3.21%), exhibited a sustained release profile, excellent physical stability, and no significant toxicity on cornea, conjunctiva, and retina. Optical coherence tomography system (OCT) was used to detect pharmacokinetics of CHL in vivo, indicating that CHL had good potency for drug delivery. Cellular uptake experiments showed CHL had the higher transduction efficiency into HCEC and ARPE-19 than liposomes. TA-CHL was shown to be potentially effective eye drop to contribute to the posterior segment of the eye.Entities:
Keywords: Chitosan; liposome; posterior segment; topical administration; triamcinolone acetonide
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30835587 PMCID: PMC6407580 DOI: 10.1080/10717544.2019.1571122
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Drug Deliv ISSN: 1071-7544 Impact factor: 6.419
Figure 1.TEM images of TA-liposomes (a) and TA-CHL (b).
Particle size (PZ), Zeta Potential (ZP), Polydispersity Index (PDI), Entrapment Efficiency (EE) % of TA-liposomes, TA-CHL, C6-liposomes, and C6-CHL.
| Sample | PZ(nm) | ZP(mv) | PDI | EE(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TA-liposomes | 108.48 ± 5.59 | −10.17 ± 1.71 | 0.18 ± 0.04 | 84.04 ± 3.89 |
| TA-CHL | 135.46 ± 4.49 | 17.98 ± 3.21 | 0.21 ± 0.03 | 90.66 ± 3.21 |
| C6-liposomes | 126.72 ± 6.01 | −12.83 ± 2.19 | 0.24 ± 0.15 | 75.13 ± 4.67 |
| C6-CHL | 145.21 ± 5.38 | 15.61 ± 3.77 | 0.27 ± 0.32 | 81.27 ± 5.13 |
Figure 2.DSC thermograms of pure TA (a), pure CH (b), blank liposome (c), TA-liposome (d) and TA-CHL (e).
Figure 3.Cumulative release profiles of TA from TA-liposomes and TA-CHL in vitro. Indicated values were mean ± SD (n = 3).
Physical stability of TA-liposomes and TA-CHL over 30 days and 60 days.
| The formulation | Storage period (days) | PZ(nm) | ZP(mv) | EE(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TA-liposomes | 0 | 108.48 ± 5.59 | −10.17 ± 1.71 | 84.04 ± 3.89 |
| 30 | 114.76 ± 4.25 | −10.15 ± 1.03 | 78.56 ± 5.36 | |
| 60 | 130.53 ± 4.88 | −10.01 ± 1.22 | 70.14 ± 4.97 | |
| TA-CHL | 0 | 135.46 ± 4.49 | 17.98 ± 3.21 | 90.66 ± 3.21 |
| 30 | 139.27 ± 3.37 | 15.39 ± 1.77 | 86.39 ± 4.68 | |
| 60 | 145.70 ± 3.97 | 12.31 ± 1.47 | 85.17 ± 5.12 |
Figure 4.OCT images of the anterior segment (a) and posterior segment (b) of the mouse eye after eye drop application of C6-liposomes/C6-CHL at different times.
Figure 5.Relative intensity of fluorescence (coumarin-6) of the anterior segment (a) and posterior segment (b) of the mouse eye after eye drop application of the C6-liposomes/C6-CHL at different times.
Figure 6.Cellular uptake of TA-liposomes and TA-CHL by HCEC at different times.
Figure 7.Cellular uptake of TA-liposomes and TA-CHL by ARPE-19 at different times.
Figure 8.HE micrographs of the anterior segment of the mouse eye ( the conjunctiva and cornea ) in control (a), after topical administration of TA-liposomes (b) and TA-CHL (c); TUNEL micrographs of the retina in control (d), after topical administration of TA-liposomes (e) and TA-CHL (f).