Spatial Dependency of Glenohumeral Joint Stability during Dynamic Unimanual and Bimanual Pushing and Pulling.

Degenerative wear to the glenoid from repetitive loading can reduce effective concavity depth and lead to future instability. Workspace design should consider glenohumeral stability to prevent initial wear. While stability has been previously explored for activities of daily living including push-pull tasks, whether stability is spatially dependent is unexplored. We simulated bimanual and unimanual push-pull tasks to 4 horizontal targets (planes of elevation: 0º, 45º, 90º, and 135º) at 90º thoracohumeral elevation and 3 elevation targets (thoracohumeral elevations: 20º, 90º, 170º) at 90º plane of elevation. The 45º horizontal target was most stable regardless of exertion type and would be the ideal target placement when considering stability. This target is likely more stable because the applied load acts perpendicular to the glenoid, limiting shear force production. The 135º horizontal target was particularly unstable for unimanual pushing (143% less stable than the 45º target), and the applied force acts parallel to the glenoid, likely creating shear forces. Pushing was less stable than pulling (all targets except sagittal 170º for both task types and horizontal 45º for bimanual) (p<0.01), which is consistent with prior reports. For example, unimanual pushing at the 90º horizontal target was 197% less stable than unimanual pulling. There were limited stability benefits to task placement for pushing, and larger stability benefits may be seen from converting pushing to pulling rather than optimizing task layout. There was no difference in stability between bimanual and unimanual tasks, suggesting no stability benefit to bimanual operation.