| Literature DB >> 30833678 |
Cheng-Long Zhang1, C M Wang2,3,4, Zhujun Yuan1, Xitong Xu1, Guangqiang Wang1, Chi-Cheng Lee5,6, Li Pi7, Changying Xi7, Hsin Lin5,6, Neil Harrison8, Hai-Zhou Lu9,10,11, Jinglei Zhang12, Shuang Jia13,14,15.
Abstract
Detecting the spectroscopic signatures of relativistic quasiparticles in emergent topological materials is crucial for searching their potential applications. Magnetometry is a powerful tool for fathoming electrons in solids, by which a clear method for discerning relativistic quasiparticles has not yet been established. Adopting the probes of magnetic torque and parallel magnetization for the archetype Weyl semimetal TaAs in strong magnetic field, we observed a quasi-linear field dependent effective transverse magnetization and a non-saturating parallel magnetization when the system enters the quantum limit. Distinct from the saturating magnetic responses for non-relativistic quasiparticles, the non-saturating signals of TaAs in strong field is consistent with our newly developed magnetization calculation for a Weyl fermion system in an arbitrary angle. Our results establish a high-field thermodynamic method for detecting the magnetic response of relativistic quasiparticles in topological materials.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30833678 PMCID: PMC6399290 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09012-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Magnetic responses of the non-relativistic and relativistic fermions. a The energy bands of non-relativistic (parabolic-band) fermions in zero magnetic field. b The LBs of non-relativistic fermions form in a magnetic field. Only the 0th LB crosses the EF in the QL. c Two energy bands of non-relativistic (parabolic-band) fermions touch each other in a momentum point in zero magnetic field. d The LBs of non-relativistic fermions touch each other in a magnetic field. e, f Calculated parallel magnetization (M||) and effective transverse magnetization (MT) of non-relativistic fermions (the two cases show identical behaviors in the QL, here we just show a representative one for brevity) as functions of magnetic field. We used two constraints for the calculation in the QL: fixed the EF (red line) and fixed carrier density (Nc) (blue line). g A typical schematic energy band of a pair of type I Weyl nodes in zero magnetic field. h A series of LBs for a pair of Weyl nodes form in a magnetic field. Two 0th LBs are entirely chiral (green and violet). i A typical relativistic fermion band (Dirac model) with a small gap. The gap is much smaller than the cutoff energy Λ. This model also gives out the same non-saturating behavior as we see in the Weyl case. j The corresponding series of LBs for a simple Dirac model with a small gap in a magnetic field. k, l Calculated M|| and MT as functions of magnetic field, respectively. The two cases show identical behaviors in the QL, and here we just show a representative one for brevity
Fig. 2τ and MT versus magnetic field at different temperatures and angles. a, b τ and MT at 1.8 K at different tilted angles, respectively. Inset in a shows the rotation setup where the angle θ is defined as the tilt off the c-axis. The curves in b have been smoothed. c, d τ and MT in a fixed angle (θ = 34.5°) at different temperatures, respectively. Inset in c shows a zoom-in in low fields where strong temperature dependent dHvA QOs superpose on a parabolic background. Inset in d shows the MT curve at 1.8 K, where two dashed coloured lines show the low- and high-field slopes. The slope takes an obvious enhancement near the QL
Fig. 3Differential effective susceptibility (χT) for TaAs. a χT at different angles. b χT for θ = 34.5° at different temperatures. c The heights of the χT plateaus at 33 T versus angles. Red dashed line shows the fitting with a relation of sin 2θ. The error bars were obtained from the standard deviations of intercepts when fitting to the step behaviors in the quantum limit
Fig. 4Comparison between experiments and theory for the M|| and MT of TaAs. a M|| (black line) and b MT (black line). The blue dashed lines represent the theoretical results with the constraint of the fixed EF in the full range of magnetic field, while the red dashed lines represent the results with the constraint of the fixed Nc in strong fields