| Literature DB >> 30833357 |
Boqun Liu1,2, Zarief Hasrat1, Bert Poolman3,4, Arnold J Boersma3,5.
Abstract
Escherichia coli adapts to changing environmental osmolality to survive and maintain growth. It has been shown that the diffusion of green fluorescent protein (GFP) in cells adapted to osmotic upshifts is higher than expected from the increase in biopolymer volume fraction. To better understand the physicochemical state of the cytoplasm in adapted cells, we now follow the macromolecular crowding during adaptation with fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based sensors. We apply an osmotic upshift and find that after an initial increase, the apparent crowding decreases over the course of hours to arrive at a value lower than that before the osmotic upshift. Crowding relates to cell volume until cell division ensues, after which a transition in the biochemical organization occurs. Analysis of single cells by microfluidics shows that changes in cell volume, elongation, and division are most likely not the cause for the transition in organization. We further show that the decrease in apparent crowding upon adaptation is similar to the apparent crowding in energy-depleted cells. Based on our findings in combination with literature data, we suggest that adapted cells have indeed an altered biochemical organization of the cytoplasm, possibly due to different effective particle size distributions and concomitant nanoscale heterogeneity. This could potentially be a general response to accommodate higher biopolymer fractions yet retaining crowding homeostasis, and it could apply to other species or conditions as well.IMPORTANCE Bacteria adapt to ever-changing environmental conditions such as osmotic stress and energy limitation. It is not well understood how biomolecules reorganize themselves inside Escherichia coli under these conditions. An altered biochemical organization would affect macromolecular crowding, which could influence reaction rates and diffusion of macromolecules. In cells adapted to osmotic upshift, protein diffusion is indeed faster than expected on the basis of the biopolymer volume fraction. We now probe the effects of macromolecular crowding in cells adapted to osmotic stress or depleted in metabolic energy with a genetically encoded fluorescence-based probe. We find that the effective macromolecular crowding in adapted and energy-depleted cells is lower than in unstressed cells, indicating major alterations in the biochemical organization of the cytoplasm.Entities:
Keywords: FRET-based sensors; biochemical organization of cytoplasm; energy status; excluded volume; macromolecular crowding; osmotic stress
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30833357 PMCID: PMC6482933 DOI: 10.1128/JB.00708-18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Bacteriol ISSN: 0021-9193 Impact factor: 3.490
FIG 1Response of E. coli BL21(DE3) containing the crGE probe in pRSET A to the addition of 300 mM NaCl. (A) The ln(OD600) decreases after the upshift and subsequently increases linearly over time (passing the preupshift OD600 after ∼1 h). The OD600 is corrected for continuous dilution of the culture to maintain the OD600 between 0.1 and 0.3. The data fit a linear curve with an R2 value of 0.99, indicating exponential growth throughout the course of the experiment. (B) The FRET/mCerulean3 ratio of the crGE probe as measured by confocal fluorescence microscopy. The ratios immediately increase after osmotic upshift and decrease after 1 h to levels lower than prior to the osmotic upshift. All data are for at least 60 E. coli cells, with a FRET/mCerulean3 standard deviation of ∼0.05 and a standard error of ∼0.009. (C) Osmotic upshift results in a decrease in median cell length as measured by fluorescence microscopy (same cells as in panel B), which is followed by an increase in length of the synchronized cells until division starts, resulting in smaller cells than those under preupshift conditions. (D) Data from panels B and C combined showing the relation (linear approximation, R2 = 0.82) between the FRET/mCerulean3 ratio and the median cell length (black circles), which holds until the cells divide. After that, the FRET/mCerulean3 ratio remains low (red circles), which is after 3 h in panels B and C. (E) Lateral diffusion of the crGE probe in unstressed and 300 mM NaCl stressed and adapted cells. The FRAP measurements were carried out as described previously (38). Displayed are the box plots generated for measurements of 10 to 20 cells, each from the same culture to allow comparison. The box represents 25 to 75% of the data range, whiskers are within the 1.5 interquartile range, the bar in the box is median, the square is the average, and stars are outliers. (F) Cell volume changes during hyperosmotic stress. E. coli BL21(DE3) expressing LacY-YPet was used, and the contours from single-molecule localizations by PALM were used to obtain the volumes of the cells (see inset). Untreated cells are measured at t of −1 h in MOPS-glucose; to capture the data point at t of 0 h, the cells were resuspended in MOPS medium without potassium and glucose to prevent recovery and subsequently treated with 300 mM NaCl. For time points 3, 4, and 5 h, cells were left to adapt to 300 mM NaCl in regular MOPS-glucose medium. For each data point, ∼30 cells were imaged and analyzed (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.005; paired sample t test).
FIG 2Single-cell analysis in microfluidics, monitored by confocal microscopy. At 2 h, the medium flown into the chamber that holds the cells was changed from 0.1× MOPS plus 160 mM NaCl to 0.1× MOPS plus 460 mM NaCl (net increase, 300 mM NaCl). The E. coli BL21(DE3) cells contained the crE6G2 sensor in pRSET A. (A) Fluorescence intensity of a single cell over time; the emissions from the mCerulean3 and the FRET channel are shown. (B) Cell length of the same cell analyzed in panel A, showing elongation and cell division and a small transient decrease in cell length following the osmotic upshift at 2 h. The time between cell divisions varies significantly. (C) The FRET/mCerulean3 ratio of the same cell, showing a qualitatively similar time course of the crowding as in the batch experiments. (D) Average of the population of cells that grow after osmotic upshift (n = 9) compared with cells that do not grow (n = 4). Shaded areas are the corresponding standard deviations.
FIG 3Crowding of energy-depleted E. coli as probed by crGE. (A) The effect of FCCP on the growth of E. coli BL21(DE3) in MOPS minimal medium supplemented with glucose. Error bars are from four technical repeats. (B) Application of 100 μM FCCP results in an immediate drop in the FRET/mCerulean3 ratio. Three independent biological repeats are displayed; error bars are error in the fit of FRET versus mCerulean3 intensity over about 100 cells.
FIG 4Changes in biochemical organization that affect crowding in cells. (A) Adaptation to osmotic stress and energy depletion changes both the size and spatial distribution of the macromolecules. (B) Working mechanism behind probe compression, where the excluded volume (orange) decreases due to crowding. This is caused by (i) increasing the translational degrees of freedom for the crowders and (ii) an osmotic pressure difference (depletion force) between the bulk and the crowder-inaccessible volume within the probe. (C) Immobile crowders do not affect the behavior described in panel B. Additionally, spatial heterogeneity increases the distance between probe and crowder and reduces the frequency of collision. (D) At a similar volume fraction, smaller crowders provide more entropy gain by virtue of number density and larger osmotic pressure differences.