Literature DB >> 30831477

'Shitty nursing' - The new normal?

David A Richards1, Gunilla Borglin2.   

Abstract

In this article we ask our profession to consider whether something is rotten at the core of modern nursing. We will use our own experiences as patients, together with published literature, to ask questions of our profession in perpetrating what one of our colleagues recently, and with great embarrassment, referred to as 'shitty nursing'. Our intention is most certainly not to offend any readers, for this term has been used in literature for more than one hundred years to describe bad situations, including those where events or people's behaviour are of a low standard. Our intention instead, is to challenge ourselves, the profession and you the reader by raising a measured debate which seems at present to be missing within the profession. We examine the potential idea that poor nursing care may not be the exception, but horrifyingly, may be the new normal. We are particularly concerned that patients' fundamental care needs may be falling into an ever widening gap between assistant and registered nurses. Whilst we acknowledge the potential causes of poor nursing care, causes that are often cited by nurses themselves, we come to the conclusion that a mature profession including clinicians, educators, administrators, researchers and regulators cannot continually blame contextual factors for its failings. A mature profession with an intact contract between itself and society must shoulder some of the responsibility for its own problems. We do suggest a way forward, including a mix of reconciliation, refocus and research, underpinned by what we argue is a much needed dose of professional humility. Readers may take us to task for potentially overstating the problem, ignoring non-nursing drivers, and downplaying other significant factors. You may think that there is much in nursing to glory in. However, we make no apology for presenting our views. Our lived experiences tell us something different. As professional nurses our main aim is to ensure that our adverse experiences as patients are statistical anomalies, and our future encounters with nursing care represent all that we know to be excellent in our profession. We leave you to judge and comment.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fundamental care; Nursing care; Patient experience; Quality

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30831477     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.12.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud        ISSN: 0020-7489            Impact factor:   5.837


  4 in total

1.  Intentional Rounding versus Standard of Care for Patients Hospitalised in Internal Medicine Wards: Results from a Cluster-Randomised Nation-Based Study.

Authors:  Dino Stefano Di Massimo; Gianluca Catania; Annachiara Crespi; Andrea Fontanella; Dario Manfellotto; Micaela La Regina; Stefano De Carli; Laura Rasero; Claudia Gatta; Giovanna Pentella; Gabriella Bordin; Antonella Croso; Annamaria Bagnasco; Gualberto Gussoni; Daiana Campani; Erica Busca; Danila Azzolina; Alberto Dal Molin
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Prioritizing and meeting life-threateningly ill patients' fundamental care needs in the emergency room-An interview study with registered nurses.

Authors:  Veronica Pavedahl; Åsa Muntlin; Martina Summer Meranius; Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz; Inger K Holmström
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.057

3.  Nursing, frailty, functional decline and models of care in relation to older people receiving long-term care: a scoping review protocol.

Authors:  Ida Røed Flyum; Edith Roth Gjevjon; Anna Josse-Eklund; Ellisiv Lærum-Onsager; Gunilla Borglin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  Speaking Up for Fundamental Care: the ILC Aalborg Statement.

Authors:  Alison Kitson; Devin Carr; Tiffany Conroy; Rebecca Feo; Mette Grønkjær; Getty Huisman-de Waal; Debra Jackson; Lianne Jeffs; Jane Merkley; Åsa Muntlin Athlin; Jennifer Parr; David A Richards; Erik Elgaard Sørensen; Yvonne Wengström
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.