Literature DB >> 30830765

Unprocessed Atmospheric Nitrate in Waters of the Northern Forest Region in the U.S. and Canada.

Stephen D Sebestyen1, Donald S Ross2, James B Shanley3, Emily M Elliott4, Carol Kendall5, John L Campbell6, D Bryan Dail7, Ivan J Fernandez8, Christine L Goodale9, Gregory B Lawrence10, Gary M Lovett11, Patrick J McHale12, Myron J Mitchell12, Sarah J Nelson8, Michelle D Shattuck13, Trent R Wickman14, Rebecca T Barnes15, Joel T Bostic16, Anthony R Buda17, Douglas A Burns10, Keith N Eshleman16, Jacques C Finlay18, David M Nelson16, Nobuhito Ohte19, Linda H Pardo20, Lucy A Rose21, Robert D Sabo20, Sherry L Schiff22, John Spoelstra23, Karl W J Williard24.   

Abstract

Little is known about the regional extent and variability of nitrate from atmospheric deposition that is transported to streams without biological processing in forests. We measured water chemistry and isotopic tracers (δ18O and δ15N) of nitrate sources across the Northern Forest Region of the U.S. and Canada and reanalyzed data from other studies to determine when, where, and how unprocessed atmospheric nitrate was transported in catchments. These inputs were more widespread and numerous than commonly recognized, but with high spatial and temporal variability. Only 6 of 32 streams had high fractions (>20%) of unprocessed atmospheric nitrate during baseflow. Seventeen had high fractions during stormflow or snowmelt, which corresponded to large fractions in near-surface soil waters or groundwaters, but not deep groundwater. The remaining 10 streams occasionally had some (<20%) unprocessed atmospheric nitrate during stormflow or baseflow. Large, sporadic events may continue to be cryptic due to atmospheric deposition variation among storms and a near complete lack of monitoring for these events. A general lack of observance may bias perceptions of occurrence; sustained monitoring of chronic nitrogen pollution effects on forests with nitrate source apportionments may offer insights needed to advance the science as well as assess regulatory and management schemes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30830765     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b01276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  1 in total

1.  Modeling geogenic and atmospheric nitrogen through the East River Watershed, Colorado Rocky Mountains.

Authors:  Taylor Maavara; Erica R Siirila-Woodburn; Fadji Maina; Reed M Maxwell; James E Sample; K Dana Chadwick; Rosemary Carroll; Michelle E Newcomer; Wenming Dong; Kenneth H Williams; Carl I Steefel; Nicholas J Bouskill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.