A W L Bayci1, D A Baker2,3, A E Somerset1, O Turkoglu4, Z Hothem1, R E Callahan1, R Mandal5, B Han5, T Bjorndahl5, D Wishart5, R Bahado-Singh4, S F Graham4, R Keidan1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI, USA. 2. Department of General Surgery, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI, USA. Dustin.Baker@beaumont.edu. 3. Department of Surgery, Beaumont Health, 3601 W. 13 Mile Rd., Royal Oak, MI, 48073, USA. Dustin.Baker@beaumont.edu. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI, USA. 5. Department of Biological and Computing Sciences, University of Alberta Edmonton, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Melanoma is a highly aggressive malignancy and is currently one of the fastest growing cancers worldwide. While early stage (I and II) disease is highly curable with excellent prognosis, mortality rates rise dramatically after distant spread. We sought to identify differences in the metabolome of melanoma patients to further elucidate the pathophysiology of melanoma and identify potential biomarkers to aid in earlier detection of recurrence. METHODS: Using 1H NMR and DI-LC-MS/MS, we profiled serum samples from 26 patients with stage III (nodal metastasis) or stage IV (distant metastasis) melanoma and compared their biochemical profiles with 46 age- and gender-matched controls. RESULTS: We accurately quantified 181 metabolites in serum using a combination of 1H NMR and DI-LC-MS/MS. We observed significant separation between cases and controls in the PLS-DA scores plot (permutation test p-value = 0.002). Using the concentrations of PC-aa-C40:3, DL-carnitine, octanoyl-L-carnitine, ethanol, and methylmalonyl-L-carnitine we developed a diagnostic algorithm with an AUC (95% CI) = 0.822 (0.665-0.979) with sensitivity and specificity of 100 and 56%, respectively. Furthermore, we identified arginine, proline, tryptophan, glutamine, glutamate, glutathione and ornithine metabolism to be significantly perturbed due to disease (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Targeted metabolomic analysis demonstrated significant differences in metabolic profiles of advanced stage (III and IV) melanoma patients as compared to controls. These differences may represent a potential avenue for the development of multi-marker serum-based assays for earlier detection of recurrences, allow for newer, more effective targeted therapy when tumor burden is less, and further elucidate the pathophysiologic changes that occur in melanoma.
INTRODUCTION:Melanoma is a highly aggressive malignancy and is currently one of the fastest growing cancers worldwide. While early stage (I and II) disease is highly curable with excellent prognosis, mortality rates rise dramatically after distant spread. We sought to identify differences in the metabolome of melanomapatients to further elucidate the pathophysiology of melanoma and identify potential biomarkers to aid in earlier detection of recurrence. METHODS: Using 1H NMR and DI-LC-MS/MS, we profiled serum samples from 26 patients with stage III (nodal metastasis) or stage IV (distant metastasis) melanoma and compared their biochemical profiles with 46 age- and gender-matched controls. RESULTS: We accurately quantified 181 metabolites in serum using a combination of 1H NMR and DI-LC-MS/MS. We observed significant separation between cases and controls in the PLS-DA scores plot (permutation test p-value = 0.002). Using the concentrations of PC-aa-C40:3, DL-carnitine, octanoyl-L-carnitine, ethanol, and methylmalonyl-L-carnitine we developed a diagnostic algorithm with an AUC (95% CI) = 0.822 (0.665-0.979) with sensitivity and specificity of 100 and 56%, respectively. Furthermore, we identified arginine, proline, tryptophan, glutamine, glutamate, glutathione and ornithine metabolism to be significantly perturbed due to disease (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Targeted metabolomic analysis demonstrated significant differences in metabolic profiles of advanced stage (III and IV) melanomapatients as compared to controls. These differences may represent a potential avenue for the development of multi-marker serum-based assays for earlier detection of recurrences, allow for newer, more effective targeted therapy when tumor burden is less, and further elucidate the pathophysiologic changes that occur in melanoma.
Authors: Paul B Chapman; Axel Hauschild; Caroline Robert; John B Haanen; Paolo Ascierto; James Larkin; Reinhard Dummer; Claus Garbe; Alessandro Testori; Michele Maio; David Hogg; Paul Lorigan; Celeste Lebbe; Thomas Jouary; Dirk Schadendorf; Antoni Ribas; Steven J O'Day; Jeffrey A Sosman; John M Kirkwood; Alexander M M Eggermont; Brigitte Dreno; Keith Nolop; Jiang Li; Betty Nelson; Jeannie Hou; Richard J Lee; Keith T Flaherty; Grant A McArthur Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-06-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Caroline Robert; Boguslawa Karaszewska; Jacob Schachter; Piotr Rutkowski; Andrzej Mackiewicz; Daniil Stroiakovski; Michael Lichinitser; Reinhard Dummer; Florent Grange; Laurent Mortier; Vanna Chiarion-Sileni; Kamil Drucis; Ivana Krajsova; Axel Hauschild; Paul Lorigan; Pascal Wolter; Georgina V Long; Keith Flaherty; Paul Nathan; Antoni Ribas; Anne-Marie Martin; Peng Sun; Wendy Crist; Jeff Legos; Stephen D Rubin; Shonda M Little; Dirk Schadendorf Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-11-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: David B Liesenfeld; Nina Habermann; Robert W Owen; Augustin Scalbert; Cornelia M Ulrich Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2013-10-04 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Dipanjan Pan; Benjamin Kim; Grace Hu; Deepti Sood Gupta; Angana Senpan; Xiaoxia Yang; Anne Schmieder; Corban Swain; Samuel A Wickline; Michael H Tomasson; Gregory M Lanza Journal: Nanomedicine (Lond) Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 5.307
Authors: Rachel S Kelly; Matthew G Vander Heiden; Edward Giovannucci; Lorelei A Mucci Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2016-04-06 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Kate D Cromwell; Merrick I Ross; Yan Xing; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Richard E Royal; Anthony Lucci; Jeffrey E Lee; Janice N Cormier Journal: Melanoma Res Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Tijmen S Bos; Wouter C Knol; Stef R A Molenaar; Leon E Niezen; Peter J Schoenmakers; Govert W Somsen; Bob W J Pirok Journal: J Sep Sci Date: 2020-03-19 Impact factor: 3.645
Authors: Daniela D Weber; Maheshwor Thapa; Sepideh Aminzadeh-Gohari; Anna-Sophia Redtenbacher; Luca Catalano; René G Feichtinger; Peter Koelblinger; Guido Dallmann; Michael Emberger; Barbara Kofler; Roland Lang Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-01-23 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Sara Paccosi; Marta Cecchi; Angela Silvano; Sergio Fabbri; Astrid Parenti Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2020-08-10 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: José Luis Palacios-Ferrer; María Belén García-Ortega; María Gallardo-Gómez; María Ángel García; Caridad Díaz; Houria Boulaiz; Javier Valdivia; José Miguel Jurado; Francisco M Almazan-Fernandez; Salvador Arias-Santiago; Víctor Amezcua; Héctor Peinado; Francisca Vicente; José Pérez Del Palacio; Juan A Marchal Journal: Mol Oncol Date: 2020-11-25 Impact factor: 7.449