Literature DB >> 30829264

Barriers affecting uptake of cervical cancer screening in low and middle income countries: A systematic review.

Pradeep Devarapalli1, Satyanarayana Labani1, Narayanasetti Nagarjuna1, Poonam Panchal1, Smita Asthana1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is the second-most common cancer among women in the developing world and approximately 500,000 cases are diagnosed each year. In developed countries, cervical cancer (CCa) accounts for only 3.6% of newly diagnosed cancers.
OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to identify the most effective barriers associated with CCa screening uptake in low and middle-income countries (L and MICs) and aid to adopt effective measures to overcome prevailing barriers to the attainment of CCa uptake in the community.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Health sciences electronic databases like MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane library, and Google Scholar were searched for studies published until August 2017. Keywords used for the search were ("cervical cancer screening"), ("barriers"), AND ("low income countries" OR "Middle income countries"). Articles were reviewed and data were extracted by using Mendeley Desktop Software (V-1.17.10). Income-level classification of countries was done as per the World Bank 2017 report. Statistical software like SPSS-V.23 and Medical-V.14 were used for the statistical application.
RESULTS: A total of 31 studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 25,650 participants. The sample size of the included studies ranged from 97 to 5929 participants. Articles majorly reported data on participants from African region (51.6%) and minimally in the Western Pacific region (3.2%). Sampling methods among studies varied from convenience sampling-12 (39.7%) to consecutive sampling-1 (3.2%). Besides, two studies (6.5%) did not discuss their sampling procedures. It was observed that "Lack of information about CCa and its treatment" (Barrier of lack of knowledge and Awareness); "Embracement or shy" (Psychological Barrier); "Lack of time" (structural Barrier); and "Lack of family support" (Sociocultural and religious barrier) were the most commonly reported among all 22 barriers.
CONCLUSION: There is a need of policies advancement of CCa screening programs by focusing on aspects of accessibility, affordability, CCa education, and the necessity of screening to improve screening uptake to control the CCa morbidity and mortality rate in L and MIC's.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barriers; Cervical cancer; diagnosis; low income countries; middle income countries; screening uptake

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30829264     DOI: 10.4103/ijc.IJC_253_18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Cancer        ISSN: 0019-509X            Impact factor:   1.224


  24 in total

1.  Cervical Cancer and Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Awareness Among Married Bhutanese Refugee and Nepali Women in Eastern Nepal.

Authors:  Madhav P Bhatta; Derek C Johnson; Mingma Lama; Bipu Maharjan; Pema Lhaki; Sadeep Shrestha
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2020-06

2.  Lifetime Prevalence of Cervical Cancer Screening in 55 Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Authors:  Julia M Lemp; Jan-Walter De Neve; Hermann Bussmann; Simiao Chen; Jennifer Manne-Goehler; Michaela Theilmann; Maja-Emilia Marcus; Cara Ebert; Charlotte Probst; Lindiwe Tsabedze-Sibanyoni; Lela Sturua; Joseph M Kibachio; Sahar Saeedi Moghaddam; Joao S Martins; Dismand Houinato; Corine Houehanou; Mongal S Gurung; Gladwell Gathecha; Farshad Farzadfar; Scott Dryden-Peterson; Justine I Davies; Rifat Atun; Sebastian Vollmer; Till Bärnighausen; Pascal Geldsetzer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Barriers and Facilitators to Participation in Health Screening: an Umbrella Review Across Conditions.

Authors:  Alice Le Bonniec; Sophie Sun; Amandine Andrin; Alexandra L Dima; Laurent Letrilliart
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2022-06-15

4.  Cervical Cancer Screening and Associated Barriers among Women in India: A Generalized Structural Equation Modeling Approach.

Authors:  Nilima Nilima; Kalaivani Mani; Siddharth Kaushik; Shesh Nath Rai
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 6.575

5.  Acceptability of Human Papilloma Virus Self-Sampling for Cervical Cancer Screening in a Cohort of Patients from Romania (Stage 2).

Authors:  Mihaela Grigore; Ingrid-Andrada Vasilache; Petru Cianga; Daniela Constantinescu; Odetta Duma; Roxana Daniela Matasariu; Ioana-Sadiye Scripcariu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.964

6.  PARP1: A Potential Molecular Marker to Identify Cancer During Colposcopy Procedures.

Authors:  Paula Demétrio de Souza França; Navjot Guru; Abigail R Kostolansky; Audrey Mauguen; Giacomo Pirovano; Susanne Kossatz; Sheryl Roberts; Marcio Abrahão; Snehal G Patel; Kay J Park; Thomas Reiner; Elizabeth Jewell
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 7.  The Roles of Hedgehog Signaling Pathway in Radioresistance of Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Chang Liu; Rensheng Wang
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Call for Systematic Population-Based Cervical Cancer Screening: Findings from Community-Based Screening Camps in Tamil Nadu, India.

Authors:  Elangovan Vidhubala; Hemant Deepak Shewade; Anandan K Niraimathi; Sethupathy Ramkumar; Gomathi Ramaswamy; G Nagalekshmi; B Sankar Mahadevan
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2019-12-01

9.  Implementation of HPV-based screening in Burkina Faso: lessons learned from the PARACAO hybrid-effectiveness study.

Authors:  Keitly Mensah; Charles Kaboré; Salifou Zeba; Magali Bouchon; Véronique Duchesne; Dolorès Pourette; Pierre DeBeaudrap; Alexandre Dumont
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 2.809

10.  Barriers to Cancer Screening Uptake in Women: A Qualitative Study from Tamil Nadu, India.

Authors:  Selvam Mahalakshmi; Sundaram Suresh
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2020-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.