Anders Karlsen1,2, Rasmus L Bechshøft1, Nikolaj M Malmgaard-Clausen1, Jesper L Andersen1,3, Peter Schjerling1,3, Michael Kjaer1,3, Abigail L Mackey1,2. 1. Institute of Sports Medicine Copenhagen, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery M, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. 2. Center for Healthy Aging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 3. Center for Healthy Aging, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract
AIMS: To examine satellite cell and myonuclear content in very old (≥83 years) individuals, and the response to heavy resistance training. METHODS:A group of very old men and women (Old, 83-94 years, n = 29) was randomized to 12 weeks of heavy resistance training or untrained controls. A group of young men who did not resistance train (Young, 19-27 years, n = 9) were included for comparison. RESULTS: Compared to young men, prior to training the old men had smaller type II fibres (-38%, P < 0.001), lower satellite cell content (-52%, P < 0.001), smaller myonuclear domain (-30%, P < 0.001), and a trend for lower myonuclear content (-13%, P = 0.09). Old women were significantly different from old men for these parameters, except for satellite cell content. Resistance training had no effect on these parameters in these old men and women. Fibre-size specific analysis showed strong correlations between fibre size and myonuclei per fibre and between fibre size and myonuclear domain for both fibre types (r = 0.94-0.99, P < 0.0001). In contrast, muscle fibre perimeter per myonucleus seemed to be constant across the range in fibre size, particularly in type I fibres (r = -0.31, P = 0.17). CONCLUSIONS: The present data demonstrate that type II fibre size, satellite cell content and myonuclear domain is significantly smaller in very old men compared to young men, while myonuclear content is less affected. These parameters were not improved with heavy resistance training at the most advanced stage of ageing.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: To examine satellite cell and myonuclear content in very old (≥83 years) individuals, and the response to heavy resistance training. METHODS: A group of very old men and women (Old, 83-94 years, n = 29) was randomized to 12 weeks of heavy resistance training or untrained controls. A group of young men who did not resistance train (Young, 19-27 years, n = 9) were included for comparison. RESULTS: Compared to young men, prior to training the old men had smaller type II fibres (-38%, P < 0.001), lower satellite cell content (-52%, P < 0.001), smaller myonuclear domain (-30%, P < 0.001), and a trend for lower myonuclear content (-13%, P = 0.09). Old women were significantly different from old men for these parameters, except for satellite cell content. Resistance training had no effect on these parameters in these old men and women. Fibre-size specific analysis showed strong correlations between fibre size and myonuclei per fibre and between fibre size and myonuclear domain for both fibre types (r = 0.94-0.99, P < 0.0001). In contrast, muscle fibre perimeter per myonucleus seemed to be constant across the range in fibre size, particularly in type I fibres (r = -0.31, P = 0.17). CONCLUSIONS: The present data demonstrate that type II fibre size, satellite cell content and myonuclear domain is significantly smaller in very old men compared to young men, while myonuclear content is less affected. These parameters were not improved with heavy resistance training at the most advanced stage of ageing.
Authors: Davis A Englund; Kevin A Murach; Cory M Dungan; Vandré C Figueiredo; Ivan J Vechetti; Esther E Dupont-Versteegden; John J McCarthy; Charlotte A Peterson Journal: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Date: 2020-04-22 Impact factor: 4.249
Authors: Paul William Hendrickse; Raulas Krusnauskas; Emma Hodson-Tole; Tomas Venckunas; Hans Degens Journal: Geroscience Date: 2020-07-08 Impact factor: 7.713
Authors: Casper Soendenbroe; Christopher L Dahl; Christopher Meulengracht; Michal Tamáš; Rene B Svensson; Peter Schjerling; Michael Kjaer; Jesper L Andersen; Abigail L Mackey Journal: J Physiol Date: 2022-03-16 Impact factor: 6.228
Authors: Konstantinos Prokopidis; Panagiotis Giannos; Oliver C Witard; Daniel Peckham; Theocharis Ispoglou Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-09-06 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Casper Soendenbroe; Cecilie J L Bechshøft; Mette F Heisterberg; Simon M Jensen; Emma Bomme; Peter Schjerling; Anders Karlsen; Michael Kjaer; Jesper L Andersen; Abigail L Mackey Journal: Cells Date: 2020-04-06 Impact factor: 6.600