Literature DB >> 30828600

Very late presentation in ST elevation myocardial infarction: Predictors and long-term mortality.

Patrick W McNair1, Kenneth C Bilchick1, Ellen C Keeley2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite improvements in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) care, total ischemic time remains long in patients who present late. Our goal was to identify predictors of very late presentation (≥12 h) of STEMI and determine long-term mortality.
METHODS: We retrospectively examined consecutive patients admitted with STEMI to our institution using the ACTION Registry™. Time of symptom onset to first medical contact (FMC) was calculated and categorized as <12 h or ≥12 h. Predictors of very late presentation were determined.
RESULTS: Compared to patients who presented <12 h (n = 365), those who presented ≥12 h (n = 49) after symptom onset were more likely women, diabetics, and those with prior coronary revascularization. In addition, patients who presented ≥12 h had worse ventricular function, were less likely to report chest pain, and were less likely to be transported by ambulance and to undergo coronary angiography. Late presenters had higher rates of heart failure, longer hospitalizations, and were less likely to be discharged home. Diabetes, female sex, and absence of chest pain were strong predictors of late presentation. Long-term survival was significantly lower in late presenters (73% vs. 93%, p = 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS: Female sex, diabetes, and absence of chest pain are strong predictors of presentation delay, and long-term mortality is significantly increased in those presenting very late.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Late presentation; STEMI

Year:  2019        PMID: 30828600      PMCID: PMC6383163          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2019.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc        ISSN: 2352-9067


Introduction

Current guidelines recommend first medical contact (FMC) to device time of ≤90 min in the treatment of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) [1]. These guidelines underscore the importance of total ischemic time (time of vessel occlusion and symptom onset to the re-establishment of antegrade blood flow) and pre-hospital initiatives aimed to decrease it. Despite continued improvements in STEMI system-based care, total ischemic time remains unacceptably long in patients who are slow to recognize symptoms and seek medical attention. Prior studies assessing predictors of presentation delay in STEMI primarily focus on delays of <6 h [[2], [3], [4]]. However, the 12-hour mark after symptom onset remains relevant because it is the accepted timepoint used in decision-making regarding candidacy for reperfusion therapy [1]. The aim of this study was to determine predictors of very late (≥12 h) presentation of STEMI and to assess long-term mortality in this patient population.

Methods

Study design

The study protocol conforms to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki as reflected in a priori approval by the University of Virginia investigational review board. Due to the retrospective nature of the study protocol, the requirement for written informed consent from each patient was waived. We retrospectively examined consecutive patients admitted with STEMI to the University of Virginia using the ACTION Registry™ from January 2011 to December 2016. STEMI was defined by electrocardiogram (ECG) criteria as new ST segment elevation at the J-point in at least two contiguous leads of ≥0.2 mm in men or ≥1.5 mm in women in leads V2-V3 and/or ≥1 mm in other leads [1]. Reasons for exclusion included: unresponsive or cardiac arrest at FMC, a diagnosis other than STEMI, and undocumented symptom onset time or symptom description.

Data collection

Demographics, co-morbidities, presenting symptom (presence or absence of chest pain), time of symptom onset, time of FMC, vital signs at FMC, laboratory and echocardiographic data, coronary angiographic data, in-hospital outcomes, and long-term all-cause mortality were collected. In-hospital outcomes included acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, stroke, and death. Time of symptom onset to FMC was calculated for each patient and categorized as <12 h or ≥12 h.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables are displayed as medians with interquartile ranges and compared with Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. Categorical variables are displayed as absolute values with percentages of the total and compared using Chi-Square or Fisher's Exact test. Statistical analysis was 2-tailed and p-values of <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Based on the two-group Wilcoxon Rank Sum or Chi-Square tests, clinically relevant differences between the two groups were evaluated with univariable logistic regression models. A stepwise, multivariable logistic regression was performed using a p-value < 0.2 to enter the model and a p-value of <0.05 to remain in the model. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Long-term survival curves using Kaplan-Meier methodology were constructed and compared using the log-rank test. Hazard ratios with 95% CI were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression. Mortality at 1 year was compared using Chi-Square. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

Results

Patient characteristics

A total of 559 patients with STEMI between 2011 and 2016 were available in the ACTION Registry™ in our institution. A total of 145 were excluded (34 were unresponsive at FMC, 35 had a diagnosis other than STEMI, and 76 did not have their symptom onset or description documented). The analysis was based on the remaining 414 patients, of whom 365 (88%) had symptom onset to FMC time of <12 h, and 49 (12%) with symptom onset to FMC time of ≥12 h. Nearly half of the very late presenters were women compared to 28% of patients presenting <12 h, and those who presented very late had higher rates of diabetes and prior coronary artery bypass surgery (Table 1). At FMC, very late presenters had higher heart rates and lower systolic blood pressures, and were less likely to be transported by emergency medical services (Table 2). Those who presented very late were less likely to report chest pain as their presenting symptom, and had lower left ventricular ejection fractions on the initial echocardiogram.
Table 1

Baseline patient characteristics.

Variable<12 h
≥12 h
p-Value
N = 365N = 49
Female sex101 (28%)23 (47%)0.006
Age (years)58 (50,68)61 (54,71)0.095
Race0.380
 White306 (84%)37 (76%)
 African American42 (12%)7 (14%)
 Hispanic8 (2%)2 (4%)
 Asian9 (2%)3 (6%)
Body mass index (kg/m2)29 (26,34)29 (25,33)0.535
Family history of coronary artery disease203 (56%)26 (53%)0.738
Tobacco use256 (70%)34 (69%)0.914
Hypertension231 (63%)31 (63%)0.998
Hyperlipidemia169 (46%)26 (53%)0.373
Diabetes mellitus91 (25%)27 (55%)<0.0001
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease33 (9%)5 (10%)0.791
Prior coronary artery disease102 (28%)12 (24%)0.611
Prior myocardial infarction82 (22%)7 (14%)0.191
Prior percutaneous coronary intervention79 (22%)7 (14%)0.233
Prior coronary artery bypass surgery9 (2%)5 (10%)0.005
Prior congestive heart failure22 (6%)6 (12%)0.104
End stage renal disease on dialysis6 (2%)0 (0%)1.000
Prior stroke22 (6%)5 (10%)0.348
Peripheral arterial disease34 (9%)3 (6%)0.600
Medications
 Aspirin123 (34%)15 (31%)0.716
 P2Y12 inhibitor28 (8%)2 (4%)0.558
 Anticoagulation16 (4%)3 (6%)0.475
 Beta-blocker97 (27%)14 (29%)0.712
 Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor93 (25%)15 (31%)0.399
 Statin118 (32%)20 (41%)0.202

Data presented as number (%), median (IQR).

Table 2

Clinical data at first medical contact and test results.

Variable<12 h
≥12 h
p-Value
N = 365N = 49
Heart rate (beats per minute)77 (65,90)89 (74,106)0.001
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)143 (124,167)133 (110,157)0.018
Acute congestive heart failure49 (13%)10 (20%)0.189
Cardiogenic shock24 (7%)4 (8%)0.760
Cardiac arrest21 (6%)3 (6%)1.000
Transported by EMS (air and ground)245 (67%)22 (45%)0.005
First medical contact to device (minutes)93 (74,113)104 (75,121)0.264
Chest pain312 (85%)35 (71%)0.012
 No chest pain53 (15%)14 (29%)
Chest pain within past 30 days120 (33%)11 (22%)0.141
Initial troponin (ng/mL)0.1 (0.0,0.8)11.9 (2.5,24.9)<0.0001
Peak troponin (ng/mL)43 (17,91)37 (13,113)0.600
Initial creatinine (mg/dL)1.0 (0.8,1.1)1.0 (0.8,1.3)0.586
Initial hemoglobin (g/dL)14 (13,15)13 (12.5,15)0.033
Left ventricular ejection fraction (%)48 (38,58)43 (33,53)0.003

Data presented as number (%), median (IQR).

Baseline patient characteristics. Data presented as number (%), median (IQR). Clinical data at first medical contact and test results. Data presented as number (%), median (IQR). Very late presenters were less likely to be referred for coronary angiography or to undergo PCI (Table 3). During the index hospitalization, they were also more likely to develop acute heart failure, have longer lengths of stay, were less likely to be discharged to home, and more likely to be discharged to a rehabilitation center. In multivariable analysis, diabetes, female sex, and absence of chest pain were strongly associated with late presentation (c-statistic = 0.70) (Table 4).
Table 3

In-hospital outcomes and discharge status.

Variable<12 h
≥12 h
p-Value
N = 365N = 49
Referred for coronary angiography360 (99%)46 (94%)0.023
Percutaneous intervention346 (94%)37 (76%)<0.0001
 Right coronary artery170 (49%)20 (54%)0.259
 Left anterior descending123 (36%)9 (24%)
 Left circumflex45 (13%)8 (22%)
 Othera8 (2%)0 (0%)
Stent placement315 (86%)29 (59%)<0.0001
Coronary artery bypass graft surgery9 (2%)1 (2%)1.000
Cardiogenic shock30 (8%)8 (16%)0.065
Acute congestive heart failure18 (5%)8 (16%)0.002
Cardiac arrest23 (6%)3 (6%)1.000
Stroke1 (0.3%)1 (2%)0.223
Death10 (3%)2 (4%)0.642
Hospital length of stay (days)3 (2,4)3 (3,7)0.006
Discharge status0.004
 Home345 (95%)41 (84%)
 Rehabilitation8 (2%)5 (10%)
 Hospice2 (1%)1 (2%)

Data presented as number (%), median (IQR).

Other includes: Left Main, Ramus, and Internal Mammary Arterial graft.

Table 4

Univariable and multivariable logistic regression.

Patient characteristicUnivariable
Multivariable
OR (95% CI)p-ValueOR (95% CI)p-Value
Female sex2.3 (1.3–4.2)0.0072.0 (1.1–3.8)0.025
Age (by decade)1.2 (1.0–1.5)0.099
Diabetes mellitus3.7 (2.0–6.8)<0.00013.4 (1.8–6.4)<0.0001
Prior myocardial infarction0.6 (0.2–1.3)0.195
Prior heart failure2.2 (0.8–5.7)0.111
Prior coronary artery bypass4.5 (1.4–14.0)0.010
Absence of chest pain during presentation2.4 (1.2–4.7)0.0142.4 (1.2–4.8)0.016
Chest pain in past 30 days0.6 (0.3–1.2)0.144

OR = odds ratio.

CI = confidence interval.

In-hospital outcomes and discharge status. Data presented as number (%), median (IQR). Other includes: Left Main, Ramus, and Internal Mammary Arterial graft. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression. OR = odds ratio. CI = confidence interval. Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 2.8 years (IQR 1.1–4.6). Survival was significantly lower in very late presenters at 1-year follow-up (73% vs. 93%, log-rank p ≤0.0001). A Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed increased long-term mortality in very late presenters (log-rank p = 0.007) (Fig. 1). Cox proportional hazard analysis calculated a hazard ratio of 2.3 (95% CI, 1.2–4.3, p = 0.009) for very late presenters compared to those presenting <12 h.
Fig. 1

Kaplan-Meier time to event model for long-term mortality.

Kaplan-Meier time to event model for long-term mortality.

Discussion

We found that 12% of STEMI patients presented very late (≤12 h) after symptom onset. Patients who presented very late were more likely to be women and diabetics, and were less likely to present with chest pain. We also found that patients who presented very late were less likely to call 911 and be transported by ambulance, suggesting they did not perceive their symptoms to be an emergency. Our results concur with prior reports focused on predictors of delayed presentation in STEMI [[2], [3], [4], [5], [6]], and now extend to patients who present very late. Longer total ischemic time has been associated with larger infarct size and increased mortality [7,8]. In a recent study, STEMI patients with pre-hospital delays of ≥12 h had worse left ventricular systolic function and higher rates of acute heart failure [5]. Similarly, we found that very late presenters had more hemodynamic compromise with higher heart rates and lower blood pressures on presentation. During the index hospitalization, very late presenters were found to have higher initial troponin levels, worse left ventricular systolic function, and higher rates of acute heart failure compared to patients who presented earlier, indicating a sicker patient population. Previous evidence has associated increased pre-hospital delay with increased in-hospital mortality [9]. While we did not find a difference in in-hospital mortality between the groups, long-term mortality was significantly higher in very late presenters. This was largely driven by increased death within the first 6 months. We contend that very late presenters remain at increased risk for death after hospital discharge and may benefit from increased post-discharge surveillance. Our results are different from a recent study of long-term mortality in STEMI patients which did not find increased mortality in those presenting late, however, in this study “late” was defined as >60 min [6]. While prior studies have shown improved outcomes with revascularization in STEMI patients presenting between 12 and 48 h after symptom onset [[10], [11], [12]], current guidelines, partly based on the findings from the Occluded Artery Trial [13], recommend deferring reperfusion in patients presenting >12 h who do not show evidence of ongoing ischemia [1]. Nevertheless, reperfusion with primary PCI >12 h from symptom onset may attenuate the increased long-term mortality associated with very late presentation [11]. Despite significant reductions in door-to-balloon times through the mid-2000s [14,15], more recently this trend has plateaued [16], suggesting little room for further improvement. Moreover, pre-hospital delay for at-risk populations have decreased marginally [2], underscoring potential improvement possibilities within this metric. Despite impressive advances in STEMI care, a sizable proportion of patients (12% in our study) continue to present very late and are subjected to longer total ischemic times. While prior efforts to reduce pre-hospital delay have been suboptimal [17], novel educational initiatives regarding STEMI symptoms (including lack of chest pain) and the importance of seeking medical attention early should continue with a special focus on vulnerable populations, including women and diabetics.

Study limitations

Our study has several limitations. First, it was a retrospective study. Second, the population was predominantly white and our results may not be applicable to other patient populations. Third, symptom onset time was based on self-reported data which can be subject to recall bias. Fourth, we do not have information regarding the incidence of atrial fibrillation or mechanical complications of STEMI in our patient cohort.

Conclusions

Female sex, diabetes, and absence of chest pain are strong predictors of presentation delay in STEMI, and long-term mortality is significantly increased in those presenting very late.

Authors contributions

PWM and ECK designed this study. PWM collected data and entered it into a database. PWM, ECK and KCB analyzed the data. All authors wrote and critically revised the manuscript and all have approved the final submitted version.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Grant support

This work was supported by the American Heart Association, Dallas, Texas [13IRG14560018 to E.C.K.]
  17 in total

1.  Extent of, and factors associated with, delay to hospital presentation in patients with acute coronary disease (the GRACE registry).

Authors:  Robert J Goldberg; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Immad Sadiq; Christopher B Granger; Elizabeth A Jackson; Andrzej Budaj; David Brieger; Alvaro Avezum; Shaun Goodman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Trends in door-to-balloon time and mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Anneliese Flynn; Mauro Moscucci; David Share; Dean Smith; Thomas LaLonde; Hameem Changezi; Arthur Riba; Hitinder S Gurm
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-11-08

Review 3.  Total ischemic time: the correct focus of attention for optimal ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction care.

Authors:  Ali E Denktas; H Vernon Anderson; James McCarthy; Richard W Smalling
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 11.195

4.  Mechanical reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting more than 12 hours from symptom onset: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Albert Schömig; Julinda Mehilli; David Antoniucci; Gjin Ndrepepa; Christina Markwardt; Francesco Di Pede; Stephan G Nekolla; Klaus Schlotterbeck; Helmut Schühlen; Jürgen Pache; Melchior Seyfarth; Stefan Martinoff; Werner Benzer; Claus Schmitt; Josef Dirschinger; Markus Schwaiger; Adnan Kastrati
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Reperfusion by primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction within 12 to 24 hours of the onset of symptoms (from a prospective national observational study [PL-ACS]).

Authors:  Marek Gierlotka; Mariusz Gasior; Krzysztof Wilczek; Michal Hawranek; Janusz Szkodzinski; Piotr Paczek; Andrzej Lekston; Zbigniew Kalarus; Marian Zembala; Lech Polonski
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Coronary intervention for persistent occlusion after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Judith S Hochman; Gervasio A Lamas; Christopher E Buller; Vladimir Dzavik; Harmony R Reynolds; Staci J Abramsky; Sandra Forman; Witold Ruzyllo; Aldo P Maggioni; Harvey White; Zygmunt Sadowski; Antonio C Carvalho; Jamie M Rankin; Jean P Renkin; P Gabriel Steg; Alice M Mascette; George Sopko; Matthias E Pfisterer; Jonathan Leor; Viliam Fridrich; Daniel B Mark; Genell L Knatterud
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Late myocardial salvage: time to recognize its reality in the reperfusion therapy of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Albert Schömig; Gjin Ndrepepa; Adnan Kastrati
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2006-07-25       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Factors associated with longer time from symptom onset to hospital presentation for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Henry H Ting; Elizabeth H Bradley; Yongfei Wang; Judith H Lichtman; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Mark D Sullivan; Bernard J Gersh; Veronique L Roger; Jeptha P Curtis; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-05-12

9.  Delay in presentation and reperfusion therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Henry H Ting; Elizabeth H Bradley; Yongfei Wang; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Bernard J Gersh; Veronique L Roger; Judith H Lichtman; Jeptha P Curtis; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  A randomized clinical trial to reduce patient prehospital delay to treatment in acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Kathleen Dracup; Sharon McKinley; Barbara Riegel; Debra K Moser; Hendrika Meischke; Lynn V Doering; Patricia Davidson; Steven M Paul; Heather Baker; Michele Pelter
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2009-10-06
View more
  12 in total

1.  Study of outcomes of delay in referral of patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Jafar Shahbazpour; Mohammad Abbasi; Narges Eskandari; Mohammad Aghaali; Reza Norouzadeh
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2022-03-23

2.  Free-floating left ventricular thrombus after rapid improvement of cardiac function related to mechanical hemodynamic support.

Authors:  Shinnosuke Kikuchi; Kiyoshi Hibi; Kouichi Tamura; Kazuo Kimura
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2020-03-18

3.  Delays in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Care During the COVID-19 Lockdown: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Cole R Clifford; Michel Le May; Alyssa Chow; Rene Boudreau; Angel Y N Fu; Quinton Barry; Aun Yeong Chong; Derek Y F So
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2020-12-15

4.  Impact in total ischemic time and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction admissions during COVID-19.

Authors:  Sharon Bruoha; Chaim Yosefy; Enrique Gallego-Colon; Jonathan Rieck; Yan Orlov; Azriel Osherov; Abu Hamed Jihad; Yaniv Sherer; Nasi Viki; Jamal Jafari
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 2.469

5.  Six-Month Outcomes for COVID-19 Negative Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Before Versus During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Ali Aldujeli; Anas Hamadeh; Kristen M Tecson; Zilvinas Krivickas; Laurynas Maciulevicius; Simas Stiklioraitis; Marius Sukys; Kasparas Briedis; Montazar Aldujeili; Kamilija Briede; Rima Braukyliene; Andrius Pranculis; Ramunas Unikas; Diana Zaliaduonyte; Peter A McCullough
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Management quality indicators and in-hospital mortality among acute coronary syndrome patients admitted to tertiary hospitals in Ethiopia: prospective observational study.

Authors:  Korinan Fanta; Fekede Bekele Daba; Elsah Tegene; Tsegaye Melaku; Ginenus Fekadu; Legese Chelkeba
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2021-03-31

Review 7.  Sympathetic Activation and Arrhythmogenesis after Myocardial Infarction: Where Do We Stand?

Authors:  Konstantinos C Zekios; Eleni-Taxiarchia Mouchtouri; Panagiotis Lekkas; Dimitrios N Nikas; Theofilos M Kolettis
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2021-05-15

8.  Highlights from the International Journal of Cardiology Heart & Vasculature: Heart failure, atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Dominik Linz; Enrico Ammirati; Gheorghe-Andrei Dan; Jordi Heijman; Dobromir Dobrev
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2019-11-20

9.  Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction from a Single-center Experience in Tokyo.

Authors:  Yukihiro Watanabe; Hideki Miyachi; Kosuke Mozawa; Kenta Yamada; Eiichiro Oka; Reiko Shiomura; Yoichiro Sugizaki; Junya Matsuda; Jun Nakata; Shuhei Tara; Yukichi Tokita; Yu-Ki Iwasaki; Takeshi Yamamoto; Hitoshi Takano; Wataru Shimizu
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 1.271

10.  Systematic Review of Clinical Decision Support Systems for Prehospital Acute Coronary Syndrome Identification.

Authors:  Charles Richard Knoery; Janet Heaton; Rob Polson; Raymond Bond; Aleeha Iftikhar; Khaled Rjoob; Victoria McGilligan; Aaron Peace; Stephen James Leslie
Journal:  Crit Pathw Cardiol       Date:  2020-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.