| Literature DB >> 30828505 |
Ruhua Zhang1, Qiang Wen2, Li-An Xu3.
Abstract
PREMISE OF THE STUDY: We developed a set of microsatellite markers to study the population genetic structure, mating system, and interspecific hybridization of Tamarix chinensis (Tamaricaceae), an alkali- and salt-tolerant shrub endemic to China, Korea, and Japan. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Illumina sequencing; Tamaricaceae; Tamarix chinensis; cross‐species amplification; simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers
Year: 2019 PMID: 30828505 PMCID: PMC6384293 DOI: 10.1002/aps3.1219
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Plant Sci ISSN: 2168-0450 Impact factor: 1.936
Characteristics of 21 novel genomic microsatellite markers developed for Tamarix chinensis
| Locus | Primer sequences (5′–3′) | Repeat motif | Allele size range (bp) | GenBank accession no. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
| TC1 | F: ATGTGGGGAGGTGGAGTG | (CTT)10 | 115–127 | 115–121 |
|
| R: AATGTATGCAGACAAAAGT | |||||
| TC3 | F: AAAGCAGGTGAGATTGAA | (TTA)11 | 150–204 | 153–201 |
|
| R: ACACCCTAATCCACATAAC | |||||
| TC4 | F: TATCCCGAGGTTGTAAAT | (AAT)11 | 162–201 | 162–186 |
|
| R: GCTGCTGGTCACCACTAA | |||||
| TC5 | F: GTCTGCCTAAGAAGTCGC | (TCTT)8 | 189–221 | 186–218 |
|
| R: CGGAAATAAGGGAGAAAT | |||||
| TC6 | F: GATAAGGTTTTGACGATT | (ATA)11 | 158–236 | 158–230 |
|
| R: TCTAGTCACCACCATCCC | |||||
| TC7 | F: GGTCCTTTAGGTTCTTCC | (TATT)8 | 194–214 | 194–206 |
|
| R: TATGGCCTCAACTATCTT | |||||
| TC8 | F: TTTGAGTTTGACGATGTA | (AAT)11 | 208–244 | 208–238 |
|
| R: GATTGACCGTGTTTTAGT | |||||
| TC12 | F: TAAGAAGGGTAGAGGAGA | (AAG)11 | 281–341 | 281–338 |
|
| R: TAATCAATAGTCACAAGG | |||||
| TC17 | F: AGTAGAGGCAAAGGTTAT | (TGA)10 | 335–347 | 332–344 |
|
| R: CTCAAAAGTCCCTCATAG | |||||
| TC19 | F: GAGGGTGGGCAAGAAATG | (TTTA)8 | 369–409 | 369–409 |
|
| R: TGACGCAGCAGTAGTGTA | |||||
| TC2 | F: CATTGTCATCATCCCACT | (AAT)10 | 151 | 151 |
|
| R: TCTTGTTGCCGACTTTGT | |||||
| TC9 | F: CGAAACTAATAACCCTAA | (TAA)10 | 205 | 205 |
|
| R: CTATCCCTGCCGACTCAA | |||||
| TC10 | F: CAACTTTCCACCCTTCTT | (ATT)11 | 239 | 239 |
|
| R: ATTCCGAGGCTACACTTA | |||||
| TC11 | F: CAGTGTTATTGAAGGGTT | (TTA)10 | 256 | 256 |
|
| R: GATTGTTGATGCGGATGG | |||||
| TC13 | F: TTCTAACCCAAAACACTC | (TATT)8 | 273 | 273 |
|
| R: ATGAAAATCCTTCCTTGT | |||||
| TC14 | F: AAATGATGTGCTTGTCGT | (AAG)10 | 290 | 290 |
|
| R: TTTAATAGCTTCTTGGAG | |||||
| TC15 | F: CTTAGCCTTAGCACTTGG | (TAT)11 | 317 | 317 |
|
| R: TAACTTCCCTCTTACTCC | |||||
| TC16 | F: TCTTCGGGTTGAGATTAC | (CATA)10 | 320 | 320 |
|
| R: TAAGGGCTTGTTTGGGAG | |||||
| TC21 | F: ATAATCTCCACCCTGCCAACA | (ATT)11 | 382 | 382 |
|
| R: AACCACCATCCACTACCACATC | |||||
| TC22 | F: TCCTCTACCCTTTCTTGC | (AAT)10 | 383 | 383 |
|
| R: ATTCCCAGTTCCACCACA | |||||
| TC24 | F: TTAATGCAGTCACGAGTT | (ATT)10 | 409 | 409 |
|
| R: GTGGTAATGTGGACGAAT | |||||
Annealing temperature for all loci was 55°C.
Level of polymorphism of 10 microsatellite loci developed for Tamarix chinensis in four T. chinensis populations and one T. ramosissima population.a
| Locus |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KL ( | HK ( | LJ ( | FS ( | CY ( | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| PIC |
|
|
| PIC |
|
|
| PIC |
|
|
| PIC |
|
|
| PIC | |
| TC1 | 3 | 0.558 | 0.517 | 0.469 | 3 | 0.364 | 0.310 | 0.478 | 3 | 0.556 | 0.526 | 0.594 | 3 | 0.300 | 0.455 | 0.566 | 3 | 0.387 | 0.457 | 0.399 |
| TC3 | 10 | 0.812 | o.794 | 0.803 | 5 | 0.677 | 0.593 | 0.612 | 7 | 0.524 | 0.616 | 0.673 | 8 | 0.626 | 0.723 | 0.717 | 13 | 0.864 | 0.892 | 0.882 |
| TC4 | 4 | 0.414 | 0.507 | 0.516 | 3 | 0.337 | 0.415 | 0.468 | 4 | 0.384 | 0.497 | 0.404 | 5 | 0.414 | 0.535 | 0.487 | 6 | 0.591 | 0.685 | 0.610 |
| TC5 | 6 | 0.667 | 0.583 | 0.632 | 4 | 0.660 | 0.678 | 0.669 | 7 | 0.750 | 0.726 | 0.723 | 4 | 0.556 | 0.562 | 0.605 | 8 | 0.739 | 0.812 | 0.788 |
| TC6 | 11 | 0.607 | 0.733 | 0.645 | 7 | 0.541 | 0.501 | 0.627 | 9 | 0.653 | 0.582 | 0.605 | 11 | 0.549 | 0.645 | 0.653 | 15 | 0.609 | 0.772 | 0.745 |
| TC7 | 4 | 0.632 | 0.568 | 0.603 | 3 | 0.548 | 0.537 | 0.606 | 4 | 0.621 | 0.678 | 0.717 | 3 | 0.523 | 0.585 | 0.568 | 4 | 0.667 | 0.621 | 0.546 |
| TC8 | 8 | 0.717 | 0.634 | 0.622 | 6 | 0.562 | 0.667 | 0.636 | 7 | 0.613 | 0.546 | 0.608 | 8 | 0.701 | 0.757 | 0.628 | 10 | 0.735 | 0.819 | 0.791 |
| TC12 | 8 | 0.596 | 0.515 | 0.502 | 6 | 0.659 | 0.553 | 0.597 | 6 | 0.549 | 0.512 | 0.504 | 7 | 0.624 | 0.657 | 0.663 | 10 | 0.712 | 0.732 | 0.713 |
| TC17 | 3 | 0.222 | 0.204 | 0.264 | 3 | 0.283 | 0.434 | 0.310 | 2 | 0.182 | 0.165 | 0.201 | 3 | 0.231 | 0.210 | 0.385 | 2 | 0.042 | 0.041 | 0.040 |
| TC19 | 5 | 0.706 | 0.630 | 0.643 | 3 | 0.846 | 0.541 | 0.512 | 3 | 0.538 | 0.494 | 0.584 | 4 | 0.636 | 0.645 | 0.693 | 8 | 0.708 | 0.667 | 0.612 |
| Mean | 6.2 | 0.593 | 0.543 | 0.570 | 4.3 | 0.548 | 0.542 | 0.572 | 5.2 | 0.537 | 0.534 | 0.561 | 5.6 | 0.516 | 0.577 | 0.597 | 7.9 | 0.605 | 0.650 | 0.601 |
A = number of alleles; H e = expected heterozygosity; H o = observed heterozygosity; N = sample size for each population; PIC = polymorphism information content.
Voucher and locality information are provided in Appendix 1.
*Indicates that H o departs significantly from H e under Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (P < 0.01).
| Species | Locality | Geographic coordinates | Population code |
| Voucher specimen accession no. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Kenli, Shandong, China | 37°48′06″N, 119°02′17″E | KL | 18 | Tch‐KL01‐ZR |
|
| Hekou, Shandong, China | 38°13′19″N, 118°50′30″E | HK | 13 | Tch‐HK02‐ZR |
|
| Lijing, Shandong, China | 38°02′13″N, 118°44′30″E | LJ | 13 | Tch‐LJ03‐ZR |
|
| Fangshan, Beijing, China | 39°63′19″N, 115°78′30″E | FS | 14 | Tch‐FS04‐ZR |
|
| Binzhou, Shandong, China | 37°22′16″N, 118°03′22″E | BZ | 1 | Tch‐BZ05‐ZR |
|
| Changyi, Shandong, China | 37°05′16″N, 119°21′22″E | CY | 24 | Tra‐CY01‐ZR |
N = number of individuals sampled.
Vouchers are deposited in Linyi University, Shandong Province, China.
All individuals were sampled from natural stands.
ZR = Ruhua Zhang.
Individual used for DNA extraction and Illumina sequencing.