| Literature DB >> 30828377 |
Chunyuan Zhang1,2, Deng Lin1, Yuzhe Wang2, Dezhi Peng2, Huifang Li3, Jing Fei2, Kuanwei Chen3, Ning Yang4, Xiaoxiang Hu2, Yiqiang Zhao1,2, Ning Li2,4.
Abstract
Chinese indigenous chickens (CICs) constitute world-renowned genetic resources due to their excellent traits, including early puberty, good meat quality and strong resistance to disease. Unfortunately, the introduction of a large number of commercial chickens in the past two decades has had an adverse effect on CICs. Using the chicken 60 K single nucleotide polymorphism chip, we assessed the genetic diversity and population structure of 1,187 chickens, representing eight Chinese indigenous chicken breeds, two hybrid chicken breeds, two ancestral chicken breeds, two commercial populations and additional red jungle fowl. By investigating haplotype similarity, we found extensive gene introgression from commercial broiler to almost all CICs. Approximately 15% of the genome, on average, of CICs was introgressed, ranging from 0.64% for Tibetan chicken to 21.52% for Huiyang Bearded chicken. Further analysis revealed signals consistent with positive selection in the introgression loci. For the first time, we systematically mapped and quantified introgression from commercial broiler to CICs at the whole genome level. Our data provided a usable resource for chicken genetic diversity, and our findings indicated a dire need for protecting the genetic resources of CICs.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese indigenous chickens; Introgression; haplotype similarity
Year: 2019 PMID: 30828377 PMCID: PMC6383742 DOI: 10.1111/eva.12742
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evol Appl ISSN: 1752-4571 Impact factor: 5.183
Summary of samples and genetic diversities
| Breed | Acronym | Sample size | Province |
| ROH (Mb) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chahua | CH | 88 | Yunnan | 78.51 | 4.51 |
| Dehong | DH | 46 | Yunnan | 92.04 | 4.99 |
| Huiyang Bearded | HY | 83 | Guangdong | 92.30 | 4.32 |
| Jinhu Black‐Bone | JH | 74 | Fujian | 87.28 | 4.83 |
| Beijing Fatty | BF | 79 | Beijing | 75.35 | 4.44 |
| Langshan | LS | 89 | Jiangsu | 78.22 | 4.30 |
| Qingyuan | QY | 90 | Guangdong | 88.63 | 5.23 |
| Silkie | SK | 75 | Jiangxi | 73.36 | 4.68 |
| Tibetan | ZJ | 71 | Tibetan | 83.34 | 4.69 |
| Wenchang | WC | 95 | Hainan | 93.05 | 5.67 |
| Shiqi Za | SQ | 93 | Guangdong (hybridization) | 87.21 | 5.16 |
| Kuaida Silkie | KD | 66 | Jiangsu (hybridization) | 82.72 | 4.93 |
| White Leghorn | WL | 54 | Commercial laying hens | 67.39 | 3.85 |
| White Plymouth Rock | WPR | 180 | Commercial broilers | 91.54 | 4.87 |
| Red Jungle Fowl | GG | 4 |
| — | — |
| Total | 1,187 |
Figure 1Samples and haplotype diversity of CICs. (a) Geographic location of CICs used in our study; (b) haplotype diversity in varying window size. The order from top to bottom: DH, WC, HY, QY, WPR, JH, ZJ, SQ, KD, CH, LS, SK, BF and WL
Figure 2Population structure for all chickens. (a) Principal component analysis (PCA) plot based on PC1 against PC2 and (b) PC2 against PC3; (c) phylogenetic relationships for all populations; (d) genetic structure and individual ancestry. Colours in each column represent ancestry proportion over the range of population sizes K = 2–5
Statistics of the candidate introgression regions from WPR
| Breed | Mean IBD length with WPR (Mb/ind) |
| Pearson correlation coefficient | Introgression ratio of whole genome (%) | Introgression ratio of PS regions (%) | PS ratio of whole genome (%) | PS ratio of introgression regions (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BF | 0.97 | −6.97 | 0.10 ( | 18.41 | 15.54 | 4.98 | 4.20 |
| HY | 0.97 | −5.09 | 0.10 ( | 21.52 | 26.90 | 4.29 | 5.36 |
| JH | 1.12 | −3.23 | 0.13 ( | 18.32 | 18.44 | 4.90 | 4.93 |
| KD | 12.73 | −4.37 | 0.10 ( | 23.98 | 23.02 | 4.82 | 4.63 |
| LS | 0.09 | −1.91 | 0.13 ( | 17.81 | 17.03 | 4.99 | 4.77 |
| QY | 0.03 | −3.16 | 0.11 ( | 12.58 | 18.46 | 4.25 | 6.23 |
| SK | 0.00 | −3.85 | 0.07 ( | 12.99 | 14.00 | 4.98 | 5.36 |
| SQ | 10.37 | −8.21 | 0.26 ( | 47.92 | 45.29 | 4.86 | 4.59 |
| WC | 0.21 | −5.82 | 0.13 ( | 15.51 | 14.56 | 4.04 | 3.79 |
| ZJ | 0.00 | −0.79 | −0.02 ( | 0.64 | 0.66 | 4.96 | 5.08 |
PS: positive selection.
Absolute value of Z larger than 1.96 will be considered as significant p value <0.05 (2.58 for very significant p value <0.01).
Figure 3Candidate loci of introgression and positive selection. (a) The statistic of introgression in varying window size for CICs. (b) Physical map and extent of introgression/positive selection on chromosome 1. Each box represents a CIC. The label on the right is the same as the abbreviation in Table 1, and the y‐coordinate is Δχ2. The location of introgression is marked with a blue vertical line, and introgression under positive selection is marked with a red vertical line. (c) Introgression frequency in CICs on chromosome 1. Purple regions indicate three long‐range introgression loci which are shared among multiple populations. The first region overlaps with the region under positive selection specifically in KD. (d) Summary of introgression sharing between populations. The number around the pie chart is the population number of introgression sharing and the corresponding ratio