Literature DB >> 30827781

Association between interpregnancy interval and adverse birth outcomes in women with a previous stillbirth: an international cohort study.

Annette K Regan1, Mika Gissler2, Maria C Magnus3, Siri E Håberg4, Stephen Ball5, Eva Malacova6, Natasha Nassar7, Helen Leonard8, Gavin Pereira6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: WHO recommends that women wait at least 2 years after a livebirth and at least 6 months after a miscarriage or induced abortion before conceiving again, to reduce the risk of adverse birth outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy. No recommendation exists for the optimal interval after a stillbirth. We investigated the association between interpregnancy interval after stillbirth and birth outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy.
METHODS: In this international cohort study, we used data from birth records from Finland (1987-2016), Norway (1980-2015), and Western Australia (1980-2015). Consecutive singleton pregnancies in women whose most recent pregnancy had ended in stillbirth of at least 22 weeks' gestation were included in the analysis. Interpregnancy interval was defined as the time between the end of pregnancy (delivery date) and the start of the next pregnancy (delivery date of next pregnancy minus gestational age at birth). We calculated odds ratios (ORs) for stillbirth, preterm birth, and small-for-gestational-age birth by interpregnancy interval by country, adjusted for maternal age, parity, decade of delivery, and gestational length of the previous pregnancy. A fixed-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate pooled ORs.
FINDINGS: We identified 14 452 births in women who had a stillbirth in the previous pregnancy; median interpregnancy interval after stillbirth was 9 months (IQR 4-19). 9109 (63%) women conceived within 12 months of the stillbirth. Of the 14 452 births, 228 (2%) were stillbirths, 2532 (18%) were preterm births, and 1284 (9%) were small-for-gestational-age births. Compared with an interpregnancy interval of 24-59 months, intervals shorter than 12 months were not associated with increased odds of subsequent stillbirth (pooled adjusted OR 1·09 [95% CI 0·63-1·91] for <6 months; 0·90 [0·47-1·71] for 6-11 months), preterm birth (0·91 [0·75-1·11] for <6 months; 0·91 [0·74-1·11] for 6-11 months), or small-for-gestational-age birth (0·66 [0·51-0·85] for <6 months; 0·64 [0·48-0·84] for 6-11 months). Further, we noted no difference in the association between interpregnancy interval and birth outcomes by gestational length of the previous stillbirth.
INTERPRETATION: Conception within 12 months of a stillbirth was common and was not associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy. These findings could be used when counselling women who are planning future pregnancies after a stillbirth and for informing future recommendations for pregnancy spacing in a high-income setting. FUNDING: National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia), and Research Council of Norway.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30827781     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32266-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  11 in total

1.  Short interpregnancy intervals and risks for birth defects: support for the nutritional depletion hypothesis.

Authors:  Julie M Petersen; Mahsa M Yazdy; Kelly D Getz; Marlene T Anderka; Martha M Werler
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Research priorities and potential methodologies to inform care in subsequent pregnancies following stillbirth: a web-based survey of healthcare professionals, researchers and advocates.

Authors:  Aleena M Wojcieszek; Alexander Ep Heazell; Philippa Middleton; David Ellwood; Robert M Silver; Vicki Flenady
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Parity and the risks of adverse birth outcomes: a retrospective study among Chinese.

Authors:  Li Lin; Ciyong Lu; Weiqing Chen; Chunrong Li; Vivian Yawei Guo
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Determinants of short birth interval among ever married reproductive age women living in Jigjiga, Eastern Ethiopia 2020 (unmatched case-control study).

Authors:  Abdurahman Kedir Roble; Mohamed Omar Osman; Ahmed Mohamed Ibrahim; Girma Tadesse Wedajo; Seid Abdi Usman
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2021-12-23

5.  High hemoglobin level is a risk factor for maternal and fetal outcomes of pregnancy in Chinese women: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Lanlan Wu; Ruifang Sun; Yao Liu; Zengyou Liu; Hengying Chen; Siwen Shen; Yuanhuan Wei; Guifang Deng
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Recurrence of postpartum hemorrhage, maternal and paternal contribution, and the effect of offspring birthweight and sex: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Lorentz Erland Linde; Cathrine Ebbing; Dag Moster; Jörg Kessler; Elham Baghestan; Mika Gissler; Svein Rasmussen
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 2.493

7.  Determinants of adverse birth outcome in Sub-Saharan Africa: analysis of recent demographic and health surveys.

Authors:  Koku Sisay Tamirat; Malede Mequanent Sisay; Getayeneh Antehunegn Tesema; Zemenu Tadesse Tessema
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Interpregnancy intervals and adverse birth outcomes in high-income countries: An international cohort study.

Authors:  Gizachew A Tessema; M Luke Marinovich; Siri E Håberg; Mika Gissler; Jonathan A Mayo; Natasha Nassar; Stephen Ball; Ana Pilar Betrán; Amanuel T Gebremedhin; Nick de Klerk; Maria C Magnus; Cicely Marston; Annette K Regan; Gary M Shaw; Amy M Padula; Gavin Pereira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Does caesarean delivery in the first pregnancy increase the risk for adverse outcome in the second? A registry-based cohort study on first and second singleton births in Norway.

Authors:  Solveig Bjellmo; Guro L Andersen; Sissel Hjelle; Kari Klungsøyr; Lone Krebs; Stian Lydersen; Pål Richard Romundstad; Torstein Vik
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-08-23       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  False-Positive Maternal Serum Screens in the Second Trimester as Markers of Placentally Mediated Complications Later in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Christy L Pylypjuk; Joel Monarrez-Espino
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 3.434

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.