Yong-Wook Choi1, Fabian Scholten1,2, Ilya Sinev1, Beatriz Roldan Cuenya1,2. 1. Department of Physics , Ruhr University Bochum , 44780 Bochum , Germany. 2. Department of Interface Science , Fritz-Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society , 14195 Berlin , Germany.
Abstract
CO2 electroreduction into useful chemicals and fuels is a promising technology that might be used to minimize the impact that the increasing industrial CO2 emissions are having on the environment. Although plasma-oxidized silver surfaces were found to display a considerably decreased overpotential for the production of CO, the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), a competing reaction against CO2 reduction, was found to increase over time. More stable and C1-product-selective SnO x/AgO x catalysts were obtained by electrodepositing Sn on O2-plasma-pretreated Ag surfaces. In particular, a strong suppression of HER (below 5% Faradaic efficiency (FE) at -0.8 V vs the reversible hydrogen electrode, RHE) during 20 h was observed. Ex situ scanning electron microscopy (SEM) combined with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), quasi in situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and operando X-ray absorption near-edge structure spectroscopy (XANES) measurements showed that our synthesis led to a highly roughened surface containing stable Snδ+/Sn species that were found to be key in the enhanced activity and stable CO/formate (HCOO-) selectivity. Our study highlights the importance of roughness, composition, and chemical state effects in CO2 electrocatalysis.
CO2 electroreduction into useful chemicals and fuels is a promising technology that might be used to minimize the impact that the increasing industrial CO2 emissions are having on the environment. Although plasma-oxidized silver surfaces were found to display a considerably decreased overpotential for the production of CO, the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), a competing reaction against CO2 reduction, was found to increase over time. More stable and C1-product-selective SnO x/AgO x catalysts were obtained by electrodepositing Sn on O2-plasma-pretreated Ag surfaces. In particular, a strong suppression of HER (below 5% Faradaic efficiency (FE) at -0.8 V vs the reversible hydrogen electrode, RHE) during 20 h was observed. Ex situ scanning electron microscopy (SEM) combined with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), quasi in situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and operando X-ray absorption near-edge structure spectroscopy (XANES) measurements showed that our synthesis led to a highly roughened surface containing stable Snδ+/Sn species that were found to be key in the enhanced activity and stable CO/formate (HCOO-) selectivity. Our study highlights the importance of roughness, composition, and chemical state effects in CO2 electrocatalysis.
More
efficient processes for the electrochemical CO2 reduction
(CO2RR) are currently actively sought in order
to mitigate the negative effects associated with the increased CO2 in our atmosphere such as in global warming while producing
valuable chemicals and fuels (CH4, C2H4, C2H5OH, etc.). Additional products from CO2RR such as CO and formate, for which higher selectivity at
lower overpotentials can be achieved, have been discussed to be economically
more feasible than some hydrocarbon and alcohol products. This is
based in the current price of grid electricity and the cost of
CO2 capture for CO2RR if it is not already available
in a concentrated form at an industrial site.[1]It is well known that p-block metal catalysts such as tin
(Sn),
lead (Pb), indium (In), and thallium (Tl) can mainly produce HCOO– during CO2RR, while CO can be primarily
obtained over gold (Au), silver (Ag), and zinc (Zn) catalysts.[2] Although Au has displayed remarkable catalytic
activity and a high Faraday efficiency (FE) for CO at a low overpotential
(87% at −0.74 V vs the reversible hydrogen electrode, RHE[3]), recent studies have tried to find alternative
catalysts owing to the high price of Au.[4−6] Nonprecious metals such
as Zn have also been identified as possible candidates, although lower
COFE efficiencies are observed.[3−7] Ag catalysts are considered to be promising alternatives because
of their high FE for CO (81.5% at −0.97 V vs RHE)[3] and a price lower than that for Au. Moreover,
numerous studies reported that nanostructuring Ag surfaces (nanoporous
materials,[8−10] nanocorals,[11] nanoplates,[12] nanosheets,[13] and
nanoparticles[14]) can lead to a decrease
in the overpotential of up to a few hundred millivolts (mV),
with efficiencies for CO reaching over 90%.To further improve
the catalytic activity, recent investigations
have focused on oxide-derived metal catalysts[15] including Cu,[16] Au,[17] Sn,[18] and Pb.[19] In these systems, the total/partial reduction process of
the preoxidized catalysts is thought to give rise to rougher surfaces
with new active sites at grain boundaries as well as to residual cationic
metal species or subsurface oxygen which might play a role in the
catalytic selectivity. In the case of oxide-derived Ag catalysts,
a fundamental understanding of the mechanisms leading to the decreased
overpotential and increased CO selectivity is still needed.[20−23] For example, preoxidized Ag surfaces have been reported to display
a stronger binding of reaction intermediates such as COOH* and CO*,[20] which was assigned to a high local pH. On the
other hand, the superior catalytic activity and selectivity of oxygen-plasma-pretreated
Ag catalysts (90% COFE at −0.6 V vs RHE) were assigned to
locally enhanced negative electric fields at defects created in the
Ag surfaces by the plasma oxidation.[23] Unfortunately,
the selectivity for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), a
competing reaction against CO2RR, was found to increase
over time during the reaction as the original AgO films were reduced and the surface roughness decreased. Therefore,
additional work is still required in order to develop Ag-based CO2RR catalysts with not only improved activity and C1-product
selectivity but, more importantly, also enhanced stability.Bimetallic systems have recently attracted attention as promising
catalysts in order to achieve active but also stable CO2RR. For instance, considerably enhanced FE toward C1 products[24,25] was obtained for systems consisting of noble metals (Au, Ag,
or Cu) and nonprecious metals (Sn or In) mixtures
by tuning the adsorption energy of intermediates.[6,26−28] Because Ag–Sn core–shell nanoparticle
catalysts lead to ∼80% FE toward formate during 24 h of CO2RR at −0.8 V vs RHE in 0.5 M NaHCO3,[6] Ag-based bimetallic systems have been proposed
as viable alternatives to maintaining stable C1-product selectivity.[29] In the case of Ag films, Larrazábal reported
that indium deposited on a bulk Ag electrode (In@Ag) showed an enhanced
CO current efficiency at moderate overpotential in comparison to bulk
Ag.[24] However, the current efficiency for
HER also increased up to 60% within 2 h of CO2RR, coinciding
with the change in chemical state of the In species. Despite the promising
results obtained thus far on Ag films for CO2RR, further
efforts to suppress HER for long-term operation is still needed on
the basis of the fundamental understanding of the parameters responsible
for the distinct activity and selectivity of Ag-based CO2RR catalysts.Herein, we present a Ag-based catalyst for CO/formate
production
from CO2RR displaying strongly suppressed HER (below 5%
FE at −0.8 V vs RHE) during 20 h. The catalysts were synthesized
by electrodepositing Sn on O2-plasma preoxidized Ag films.
Quasi in situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), operando X-ray absorption near-edge structure spectroscopy
(XANES), and ex situ scanning electron microscopy
equipped with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) were
employed to investigate the chemical state and surface morphology
of the catalysts at different stages of the reaction in order to extract
correlations among the structure, chemical state, and composition
of the electrocatalysts and their activity and selectivity.
Experimental Detals
Catalyst Synthesis
For the synthesis
of Ag-based catalysts, Ag foils (99.97% purity and 125 μm thickness)
were mechanically polished with siliconcarbide paper (400 grit) and
subsequently rinsed in deionized water and dried with argon (Ar).
Oxygen plasma treatments (Plasma Prep III, SPI) were employed to modify
the roughness and oxidation state of the Ag foils (denoted as AgO). The plasma conditions were 20 W and 350
mTorr O2 for 2 min. To electrodeposit Sn on a metallic
Ag surface (denoted as a SnO/Ag sample
after air exposure) and on the plasma-oxidized AgO surfaces (denoted as a SnO/AgO sample after air exposure), a conventional
three-electrode system was used with an Ag/AgCl (3 M KCl) reference
electrode and Pt mesh as the counter electrode. Electrochemical sequences
with two steps consisting of linear sweep voltammetry (−0.75
V to −2.0 vs Ag/AgCl) with a sweep speed of 100 mV/s and chronoamperometry
at −2.0 V vs Ag/AgCl for 1 min were employed in order to avoid
the parallel deposition of impurities such as metal salts in the aqueous
solution. A solution of 0.05 M SnCl2 (98% and Alfa-Aesar)
mixed with 2 M NaOH (99.3% and VRW Chemicals) was used for the electrochemical
Sn deposition. The electrodeposited catalysts were washed with deionized
water and subsequently dried with Ar gas.
Characterization
The morphology and
chemical state of the catalysts were investigated by SEM with an FEI
Quanta 200 FEG microscope and a liquid-N2 EDS detector.
The quasi in situ XPS measurements were performed
in an ultrahigh-vacuum setup equipped with a Phoibos100 (SPECS GmbH)
analyzer (pass energy, Epass = 13
eV) and an Al anode of a XR50 (SPECS GmbH) X-ray source (Psource= 300 W). The transfer from the electrochemical
cell toward the UHV system is done under a pressurized argon atmosphere
(99.999% Ar). All XPS measurements were acquired at high resolution
(0.05 eV) and correspond to an average of at least five scans. The
Casa XPS software was used for data analysis. All spectra were aligned
to the C 1s region (Eb = 284.8 eV). The
presented fits of the XPS spectra where made by first measuring the
corresponding bulk references. SnO, SnO2, Ag2O, and AgO powders (99.999% Sigma-Aldrich) were measured as references
for the different oxides, and Ar-sputtered (UHV-treated) Sn and Ag
foils were used as references for the metallic spectra. All reference
spectra used for fitting were additionally constrained with respect
to their energy position (dE = 0.05 eV), using the
corresponding values reported in the literature.[30,31]To evaluate the catalytic performance, a home-built H-type
electrochemical cell separated by a Selemion anion exchange membrane
was used for CO2 electrolysis at room temperature with
an AutoLab PGSTAT128N potentiostat. A Pt mesh was used as the counter
electrode, and a leak-free Ag/AgCl electrode (LF-1, Innovative Instruments,
Inc.) was used as the reference. CO2RR was carried out
in a purified 0.1 M KHCO3 solution by applying a potential
between −0.6 and −0.8 V vs RHE under a constant 20 mL/min
CO2 flow rate. Prior to the electrochemical reaction, the
electrolyte was purified with Chelex 100 Resin (Bio-Rad)[32,33] in order to minimize the effect of metal impurities in the electrolyte
and subsequently purged with CO2 gas (99.95%) for 30 min
to reach a pH value of 6.8. The gas products were injected into an
online gas chromatograph (Agilent 7890A) every 17 min during CO2RR. Liquid products such as formate were detected by high-performance
liquid chromatography (HPLC, Shimadzu) after CO2RR. The
value of the solution resistance was measured with the iR interrupt method[34] and electrochemical
impedance spectroscopy. To determine the roughness factor of the catalysts,
the double-layer capacitance was measured between 0 and 0.25 V vs
RHE after 1 and 20 h of reaction in 0.1 M KHCO3 (Figure
S1 and Table S1 in Supporting Information).Operando XANES measurements were conducted
with
a home-built electrochemical cell using Pt mesh (MaTeck) and leak-free
Ag/AgCl as counter and reference electrodes, respectively. The measurements
were made in fluorescence mode using a planar implanted silicon (PIPS)
detector at the P64 undulator beamline of the PETRA III synchrotron
radiation facility.
Results and Discussion
Morphological Characterization
To
synthesize stable Ag–SnCO2RR catalysts, O2-plasma treatments on Ag foils and subsequent Sn electrodeposition
were employed. Figure presents SEM images of SnO/Ag and SnO/AgO bimetallic
catalysts as prepared (top row) and after 20 h of CO2RR
at −0.8 V vs RHE (bottom row). A comparison with a monometallic
AgO catalyst is also included. An enhanced
surface roughness is observed for all samples resulting from either
the O2-plasma pretreatment or the Sn electrodeposition.
On the basis of the roughness factors extracted from electrochemical
double-layer capacitance measurements, the roughness was found to
increase in the order of AgO > SnO/AgO > SnO/Ag > metallic Ag foil (Figure S1 and Table S1).
Figure 1
SEM images of AgOx (a, d),
SnOx/AgOx (b, e), and SnOx/Ag (c,
f) catalysts acquired before
(a–c) and after CO2RR at −0.8 V vs RHE for
20 h (d–f). The average values of the composition extracted
from SEM-EDS measurements are also shown. The scale bars indicate
20 μm. The insets show higher-magnification images (scale bars,
2 μm).
SEM images of AgOx (a, d),
SnOx/AgOx (b, e), and SnOx/Ag (c,
f) catalysts acquired before
(a–c) and after CO2RR at −0.8 V vs RHE for
20 h (d–f). The average values of the composition extracted
from SEM-EDS measurements are also shown. The scale bars indicate
20 μm. The insets show higher-magnification images (scale bars,
2 μm).A strong change in the
morphology of the AgO (Figure d)
and SnO/AgO (Figure e) samples
occurs after 20 h of CO2RR, while the surface of the SnO/Ag sample (Figure f) is only mildly altered under reduction
reaction conditions. The SnO/AgO sample already shows a slight change in
surface roughness after 1 h of reaction (Figure S2). Our EDS analysis shows that the entire surface of the
Ag and AgO substrates was covered with
Sn.
Chemical State/Surface Composition Characterization
To gain further information on the chemical state of the Ag–Sn
bimetallic catalysts as prepared and after reaction, quasi in situ XPS measurements were carried out on the SnO/AgO and SnO/Ag samples before and after CO2RR at −0.8 V versus RHE in an electrochemical cell directly
attached to the XPS system.As expected, after O2-plasma treatment the Ag substrate is oxidized. (See the Ag MNN Auger
spectra in Figure S3.) Nevertheless, after
the in situ Sn electrodeposition, only metallic Ag
is seen. This is directly linked to the strong reductive alkaline
conditions employed during the Sn electrodeposition.[35] Moreover, it should be noted that the deposition process
does not leave behind any residual Cl, which might influence the CO2RR mechanism (Figures S4 and S6) by decreasing the overpotential for forming the CO2 radical.[11]By comparing the integrated area of the
Ag 3d and Sn 3d XPS peaks
(Figure S5), the Sn/Ag ratio on the surface
of the SnO/AgO and SnO/Ag samples was 1:1 and
3:1 (Table S2), respectively. This
ratio is higher than that extracted by EDX because Sn is deposited
on top of the Ag substrates and XPS is a more surface-sensitive technique
than EDX. Overall, the XPS data reveal that the catalyst surface composition
is stable and that there is no evidence of sintering or interdiffusion
of the two metals even after 20 h of CO2RR.Figure displays
Sn MNN Auger spectra from the SnO/AgO and SnO/Ag
samples acquired as prepared and after 1 and 20 h of CO2RR. In both samples, features corresponding to metallic Sn[31] are seen after the reaction, together with SnOx species.[34] The progressive reduction
of the SnOx species is observed with increasing reaction
time, but there are still Sn oxides present on the surfaces of both
samples even after CO2RR at −0.8 V vs RHE for 20
h (Figure and Table S3).
Figure 2
Quasi in situ Sn MNN
Auger spectra of Sn electrodeposited
on (a) an O2-plasma-treated Ag substrate (AgOx) and (b) a pristine Ag substrate. Colored spectra are Sn MNN reference
spectra (metallic Sn, SnO, and SnO2) used to fit the envelope
of Auger spectra. Electrochemical CO2RR has been performed
at a working potential of −0.81 V vs RHE in 0.1 M KHCO3.
Quasi in situ Sn MNN
Auger spectra of Sn electrodeposited
on (a) an O2-plasma-treated Ag substrate (AgOx) and (b) a pristine Ag substrate. Colored spectra are Sn MNN reference
spectra (metallic Sn, SnO, and SnO2) used to fit the envelope
of Auger spectra. Electrochemical CO2RR has been performed
at a working potential of −0.81 V vs RHE in 0.1 M KHCO3.Nonetheless, because of the quasi in situ nature
of the former measurements and although the samples were never exposed
to air during the transfer to the XPS chamber, they were still in
contact with the electrolyte after reaction during the transfer (5–15
s) in the absence of an applied potential, which could result in partial
reoxidation of the surface Sn species. To confirm that SnOx species indeed remain stable under reaction conditions at the
potentials of interest, operando X-ray absorption
spectroscopy measurements were also conducted. XANES was used to gain
insight into changes in the catalysts chemical state and morphology
during CO2RR. It should be noted that this technique is
bulk-sensitive, providing information from surface and subsurface
sample regions. Furthermore, the fluorescence signal detected here
is highly dominated by the radiation emitted by the silver support.
Unfortunately, the Ag Kβ emission line (24 941 eV) overlaps
with the Sn Kα series (24 735–25 272 eV),
making the measurements of these samples at the Sn K edge very challenging.
Nevertheless, insight into the chemical state of Sn before and under
CO2RR conditions can still be extracted by comparing to
reference spectra (Figure ).
Figure 3
(a) Sn K-edge XANES spectra of Sn electrodeposited on O2-plasma-treated Ag (SnO/AgO) and on a pristine Ag foil (SnOx/Ag)
measured as-prepared and under CO2RR conditions after 5
h of activation at −0.8 V vs RHE in 0.1 M KHCO3.
Reference spectra of the metallic Sn foil, SnO, and SnO2 are also shown. Vertical lines provide a guide for the eye and represent
the white line position of the reference Sn foil, of bulk SnO (dashed
line), and of bulk SnO2 (dotted line). (b) Sn K-edge XANES
spectrum of SnO/AgO (open circles) under CO2RR conditions together
with the linear combination fit (red solid line) and the weighted
spectral components corresponding to Sn and SnO2 species.
(a) Sn K-edge XANES spectra of Sn electrodeposited on O2-plasma-treated Ag (SnO/AgO) and on a pristine Ag foil (SnOx/Ag)
measured as-prepared and under CO2RR conditions after 5
h of activation at −0.8 V vs RHE in 0.1 M KHCO3.
Reference spectra of the metallic Sn foil, SnO, and SnO2 are also shown. Vertical lines provide a guide for the eye and represent
the white line position of the reference Sn foil, of bulk SnO (dashed
line), and of bulk SnO2 (dotted line). (b) Sn K-edge XANES
spectrum of SnO/AgO (open circles) under CO2RR conditions together
with the linear combination fit (red solid line) and the weighted
spectral components corresponding to Sn and SnO2 species.The Sn spectrum of the SnO/Ag sample
in Figure a resembles
that of the Sn foil, showing a low-intensity feature above the edge
(the so-called “white line”) at 29 207.8 eV that
barely changes under CO2RR. This indicates that even though
the sample surface might be oxidized, the signal of the metallic Sn
subsurface layers dominates the XAFS spectrum. On the other hand,
the sample deposited on plasma-treated Ag (SnO/AgO) is severely oxidized prior
to the reaction as indicated by a more intense white line shifted
to 29 209.6 eV. Under the reaction conditions, the white line
gets broader but less intense and shifts to slightly lower photon
energy. To get quantitative information on the Sn species observed,
XANES spectra were fitted using a linear combination (LC) of the reference
spectra of a Sn foil, SnO, and SnO2 (Figure b). Because XANES spectra of both oxides
show similar features and differ only in the intensity and position
of the white line, an energy shift, fitted during linear combination
analysis, served as an extra figure of merit along with the R factor. Thus, if two fits, using different oxides as principle
components, resulted in similar R-factor values,
then the one with a smaller energy shift was accepted. Hence, with
these bulk-sensitive techniques, the as-prepared SnO/Ag sample was found to consist of 90% metallic Sn and a 10%
mixture of SnO and SnO2 in a 2:1 ratio. (See Table S4 and Figure S7 for details.) The LC analysis
proves the full reduction of Sn in this sample under the reaction
conditions. The SnO/AgO sample shows more severe oxidation in its as-prepared state,
with Sn0 and Sn4+ species present in a ratio
close to 1:1. In contrast to the sample supported on pristine Ag,
the SnO layer deposited on AgO was not fully reduced after 5 h under CO2RR conditions with 23% of Sn remaining as SnO2.The combined results from XPS (surface-sensitive) and XANES (bulk-dominated)
analysis indicate that although the surfaces of the SnOx/Ag and SnOx/AgOx samples are oxidized in their
as-prepared states, the oxide layer thickness is not very thick in
the case of the SnOx/Ag sample. This is concluded on the
basis of the XANES data revealing a mainly reduced sample before and
during CO2RR, while only via the more sensitive XPS technique
can one detect the partial reduction of the SnOx species
during the first 20 h of CO2RR. On the other hand, SnO species were found to remain in the SnO/AgO sample
not only at the surface (XPS) but also at the subsurface (XANES) at
least within the first 5 h of the reaction.
CO2RR Performance
Figure a shows the selectivity
of electrocatalysts toward the main products such as CO, H2, and formate at −0.8 V vs RHE in 0.1 M KHCO3 after
1 h of CO2RR. By utilizing a plasma-oxidized Ag foil as substrate,
AgO and SnO/AgO catalysts show outstanding selectivity
toward C1 products (∼95% FE) versus the parasitic HER (<5%
FE), whereas the SnO/Ag catalyst employing
a metallic Ag foil as a support shows a higher FE for HER (30% after
1 h of CO2RR) than on the AgO substrates.
Figure 4
(a) Faradaic efficiencies and (b) partial current densities
of
AgO, SnO/AgO, SnO/Ag, metallic Ag, and Sn catalysts acquired after 1 h of CO2RR at −0.8 V vs RHE in 0.1 M KHCO3.Each column
represents Formate (dotted blue), CO (straight red line), and H2 (gray).
(a) Faradaic efficiencies and (b) partial current densities
of
AgO, SnO/AgO, SnO/Ag, metallic Ag, and Sn catalysts acquired after 1 h of CO2RR at −0.8 V vs RHE in 0.1 M KHCO3.Each column
represents Formate (dotted blue), CO (straight red line), and H2 (gray).A correlation is also
found between the roughness and the catalytic
activity, with enhanced activity for the rougher surfaces. The O2-plasma treatment, resulting in rough and defect-rich AgO and SnO/AgO surfaces,[23] leads
to 2-fold-enhanced catalytic activity as compared to that of analogous
but flatter surfaces such as metallic Ag and SnO/Ag, as shown in Figure b. Nevertheless, for samples with similar roughness factors
(AgO and SnO/AgO, see Table S1), the product selectivity is strongly affected by the presence
of Sn, with the SnO/AgO sample producing more formate than the AgO sample but also generating less H2 when the performance
is evaluated over a longer period of time (20 h) (Figure ).
Figure 5
Temporal evolution of
the activity and selectivity of different
CO2RR catalysts: (a) AgO,
(b) SnO/AgO, and (c) SnOx/Ag at −0.8 V vs RHE for 20 h during
CO2RR. Green lines indicate the total current densities
(left y axis). Faradaic efficiencies (right y axis) of CO (red •) and H2 (■)
are also shown. The FE value of HCOO– was obtained
after 20 h of CO2RR.
Temporal evolution of
the activity and selectivity of different
CO2RR catalysts: (a) AgO,
(b) SnO/AgO, and (c) SnOx/Ag at −0.8 V vs RHE for 20 h during
CO2RR. Green lines indicate the total current densities
(left y axis). Faradaic efficiencies (right y axis) of CO (red •) and H2 (■)
are also shown. The FE value of HCOO– was obtained
after 20 h of CO2RR.Although CO2RR catalysts based on plasma-oxidized
Ag
substrates display remarkable catalytic activity and selectivity for
CO during the first hour of reaction, it is still essential to design
stable catalysts that can suppress HER while maintaining the selectivity
for C1 products. As can be seen in Figure a, the monometallic AgO catalyst shows a distinct deactivation over time, with an
increase in the HER pathway likely due to the decrease in the population
of defect sites and the overall decrease in surface roughness with
time.[23]In contrast, the SnO/AgO sample
is found to be significantly more stable
in terms of the total current density and the C1 product conversion
while maintaining a constantly low (5%) FE for H2 (Figure b). A possible explanation
for the stability of the SnO/AgO sample is that Sn electrodeposition on the
rough AgO surface is able to preserve
the surface roughness under reaction conditions better than when the
AgO surface is uncoated. In fact, according
to the roughness factors measured after different reaction times (Table S1), the roughness of the SnO/AgO surface is slightly
increased after 20 h of reaction, while a decrease in the roughness
is found for the pure AgO, which leads
to the loss of highly active defect sites needed for the conversion
to C1 products. The increase in the surface roughness reported to
occur for SnO surfaces with decreasing
oxide layer thickness was previously associated with a shift in surface
orientation during electrolytic reduction.[36]Interestingly, the ratio of the selectivity of formate and
CO on
the SnO/AgO catalyst changed from 1:1 after the first hour of reaction (Figure ) to 1:3 after 20
h of reaction (Figure b) in spite of sustaining ∼95% selectivity for C1 products.
This phenomenon can be explained by considering the expected changes
in the SnO thickness[25] during CO2RR.[36] For
instance, in Cu/Sn core/shell structures, 1.8 nm tin oxide shells
are selective to formate, whereas thinner (0.8 nm) oxide shells favor
CO formation. The later was explained on the basis of the SnO surface strain leading to a decrease in
the overpotential forming intermediates.[25] Another plausible explanation for the temporal evolution of the
CO and formate selectivity are morphological alterations (see in Figure b,e and Figure S2) on the sample surface taking
place during electrocatalysis.Furthermore, the chemical state
of the Sn species deposited on
the surface appears to be a particularly important factor in determining
the reaction selectivity. An electrode consisting of both Sn0 and Snδ+ (δ = 2, 4) species has shown remarkable
catalytic activity and FE toward formate compared to a native SnO or a fresh Sn0 surface.[18] By employing in situ spectroscopic
analysis (XPS and XANES), it is confirmed that these oxides at least
partially survive under CO2 reduction conditions[37,38] or are present as surface hydroxides in the divalent oxidation state,
which has been suggested to play a key role in formate production
over SnO thin film electrodes.[39] In summary, the enhanced catalytic selectivity
for C1 products is assigned to the stabilization of cationic Sn species
on the SnO/AgO samples while maintaining adequate roughness during long-term
CO2RR.
Conclusions
Ag–Sn
bimetallic catalysts synthesized via Sn electrodeposition
on O2-plasma-pretreated Ag foils (SnO/AgO) were found to display enhanced
C1 product selectivity (≥95% at −0.8 V vs RHE) during
CO2RR while maintaining low HER (<5% after 20 h). In
clear contrast, a nearly 40% increase in HER selectivity was obtained
for Sn-free AgO during the same period
of time. Ex situ SEM showed that the O2-plasma treatment provided a highly roughened surface, while quasi in situ XPS and operando XANES data revealed
the presence of cationic Sn species stabilized at the SnO/AgO surface even after
prolonged reaction times. Furthermore, such species are found to be
much less stable at the SnO/Ag surface.
We expect that the findings presented here on the important synergistic
interplay between surface roughness and stable Snδ+/Sn species can further guide the rational design of more stable
and efficient CO2 electrocatalysts.
Authors: Kendra P Kuhl; Toru Hatsukade; Etosha R Cave; David N Abram; Jakob Kibsgaard; Thomas F Jaramillo Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2014-09-26 Impact factor: 15.419