Literature DB >> 30827111

Enhanced Stability and CO/Formate Selectivity of Plasma-Treated SnO x/AgO x Catalysts during CO2 Electroreduction.

Yong-Wook Choi1, Fabian Scholten1,2, Ilya Sinev1, Beatriz Roldan Cuenya1,2.   

Abstract

CO2 electroreduction into useful chemicals and fuels is a promising technology that might be used to minimize the impact that the increasing industrial CO2 emissions are having on the environment. Although plasma-oxidized silver surfaces were found to display a considerably decreased overpotential for the production of CO, the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), a competing reaction against CO2 reduction, was found to increase over time. More stable and C1-product-selective SnO x/AgO x catalysts were obtained by electrodepositing Sn on O2-plasma-pretreated Ag surfaces. In particular, a strong suppression of HER (below 5% Faradaic efficiency (FE) at -0.8 V vs the reversible hydrogen electrode, RHE) during 20 h was observed. Ex situ scanning electron microscopy (SEM) combined with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), quasi in situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and operando X-ray absorption near-edge structure spectroscopy (XANES) measurements showed that our synthesis led to a highly roughened surface containing stable Snδ+/Sn species that were found to be key in the enhanced activity and stable CO/formate (HCOO-) selectivity. Our study highlights the importance of roughness, composition, and chemical state effects in CO2 electrocatalysis.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30827111      PMCID: PMC6449802          DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b12766

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


Introduction

More efficient processes for the electrochemical CO2 reduction (CO2RR) are currently actively sought in order to mitigate the negative effects associated with the increased CO2 in our atmosphere such as in global warming while producing valuable chemicals and fuels (CH4, C2H4, C2H5OH, etc.). Additional products from CO2RR such as CO and formate, for which higher selectivity at lower overpotentials can be achieved, have been discussed to be economically more feasible than some hydrocarbon and alcohol products. This is based in the current price of grid electricity and the cost of CO2 capture for CO2RR if it is not already available in a concentrated form at an industrial site.[1] It is well known that p-block metal catalysts such as tin (Sn), lead (Pb), indium (In), and thallium (Tl) can mainly produce HCOO– during CO2RR, while CO can be primarily obtained over gold (Au), silver (Ag), and zinc (Zn) catalysts.[2] Although Au has displayed remarkable catalytic activity and a high Faraday efficiency (FE) for CO at a low overpotential (87% at −0.74 V vs the reversible hydrogen electrode, RHE[3]), recent studies have tried to find alternative catalysts owing to the high price of Au.[4−6] Nonprecious metals such as Zn have also been identified as possible candidates, although lower CO FE efficiencies are observed.[3−7] Ag catalysts are considered to be promising alternatives because of their high FE for CO (81.5% at −0.97 V vs RHE)[3] and a price lower than that for Au. Moreover, numerous studies reported that nanostructuring Ag surfaces (nanoporous materials,[8−10] nanocorals,[11] nanoplates,[12] nanosheets,[13] and nanoparticles[14]) can lead to a decrease in the overpotential of up to a few hundred millivolts (mV), with efficiencies for CO reaching over 90%. To further improve the catalytic activity, recent investigations have focused on oxide-derived metal catalysts[15] including Cu,[16] Au,[17] Sn,[18] and Pb.[19] In these systems, the total/partial reduction process of the preoxidized catalysts is thought to give rise to rougher surfaces with new active sites at grain boundaries as well as to residual cationic metal species or subsurface oxygen which might play a role in the catalytic selectivity. In the case of oxide-derived Ag catalysts, a fundamental understanding of the mechanisms leading to the decreased overpotential and increased CO selectivity is still needed.[20−23] For example, preoxidized Ag surfaces have been reported to display a stronger binding of reaction intermediates such as COOH* and CO*,[20] which was assigned to a high local pH. On the other hand, the superior catalytic activity and selectivity of oxygen-plasma-pretreated Ag catalysts (90% CO FE at −0.6 V vs RHE) were assigned to locally enhanced negative electric fields at defects created in the Ag surfaces by the plasma oxidation.[23] Unfortunately, the selectivity for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), a competing reaction against CO2RR, was found to increase over time during the reaction as the original AgO films were reduced and the surface roughness decreased. Therefore, additional work is still required in order to develop Ag-based CO2RR catalysts with not only improved activity and C1-product selectivity but, more importantly, also enhanced stability. Bimetallic systems have recently attracted attention as promising catalysts in order to achieve active but also stable CO2RR. For instance, considerably enhanced FE toward C1 products[24,25] was obtained for systems consisting of noble metals (Au, Ag, or Cu) and  nonprecious metals (Sn or In) mixtures by tuning the adsorption energy of intermediates.[6,26−28] Because Ag–Sn core–shell nanoparticle catalysts lead to ∼80% FE toward formate during 24 h of CO2RR at −0.8 V vs RHE in 0.5 M NaHCO3,[6] Ag-based bimetallic systems have been proposed as viable alternatives to maintaining stable C1-product selectivity.[29] In the case of Ag films, Larrazábal reported that indium deposited on a bulk Ag electrode (In@Ag) showed an enhanced CO current efficiency at moderate overpotential in comparison to bulk Ag.[24] However, the current efficiency for HER also increased up to 60% within 2 h of CO2RR, coinciding with the change in chemical state of the In species. Despite the promising results obtained thus far on Ag films for CO2RR, further efforts to suppress HER for long-term operation is still needed on the basis of the fundamental understanding of the parameters responsible for the distinct activity and selectivity of Ag-based CO2RR catalysts. Herein, we present a Ag-based catalyst for CO/formate production from CO2RR displaying strongly suppressed HER (below 5% FE at −0.8 V vs RHE) during 20 h. The catalysts were synthesized by electrodepositing Sn on O2-plasma preoxidized Ag films. Quasi in situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), operando X-ray absorption near-edge structure spectroscopy (XANES), and ex situ scanning electron microscopy equipped with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) were employed to investigate the chemical state and surface morphology of the catalysts at different stages of the reaction in order to extract correlations among the structure, chemical state, and composition of the electrocatalysts and their activity and selectivity.

Experimental Detals

Catalyst Synthesis

For the synthesis of Ag-based catalysts, Ag foils (99.97% purity and 125 μm thickness) were mechanically polished with silicon carbide paper (400 grit) and subsequently rinsed in deionized water and dried with argon (Ar). Oxygen plasma treatments (Plasma Prep III, SPI) were employed to modify the roughness and oxidation state of the Ag foils (denoted as AgO). The plasma conditions were 20 W and 350 mTorr O2 for 2 min. To electrodeposit Sn on a metallic Ag surface (denoted as a SnO/Ag sample after air exposure) and on the plasma-oxidized AgO surfaces (denoted as a SnO/AgO sample after air exposure), a conventional three-electrode system was used with an Ag/AgCl (3 M KCl) reference electrode and Pt mesh as the counter electrode. Electrochemical sequences with two steps consisting of linear sweep voltammetry (−0.75 V to −2.0 vs Ag/AgCl) with a sweep speed of 100 mV/s and chronoamperometry at −2.0 V vs Ag/AgCl for 1 min were employed in order to avoid the parallel deposition of impurities such as metal salts in the aqueous solution. A solution of 0.05 M SnCl2 (98% and Alfa-Aesar) mixed with 2 M NaOH (99.3% and VRW Chemicals) was used for the electrochemical Sn deposition. The electrodeposited catalysts were washed with deionized water and subsequently dried with Ar gas.

Characterization

The morphology and chemical state of the catalysts were investigated by SEM with an FEI Quanta 200 FEG microscope and a liquid-N2 EDS detector. The quasi in situ XPS measurements were performed in an ultrahigh-vacuum setup equipped with a Phoibos100 (SPECS GmbH) analyzer (pass energy, Epass = 13 eV) and an Al anode of a XR50 (SPECS GmbH) X-ray source (Psource= 300 W). The transfer from the electrochemical cell toward the UHV system is done under a pressurized argon atmosphere (99.999% Ar). All XPS measurements were acquired at high resolution (0.05 eV) and correspond to an average of at least five scans. The Casa XPS software was used for data analysis. All spectra were aligned to the C 1s region (Eb = 284.8 eV). The presented fits of the XPS spectra where made by first measuring the corresponding bulk references. SnO, SnO2, Ag2O, and AgO powders (99.999% Sigma-Aldrich) were measured as references for the different oxides, and Ar-sputtered (UHV-treated) Sn and Ag foils were used as references for the metallic spectra. All reference spectra used for fitting were additionally constrained with respect to their energy position (dE = 0.05 eV), using the corresponding values reported in the literature.[30,31] To evaluate the catalytic performance, a home-built H-type electrochemical cell separated by a Selemion anion exchange membrane was used for CO2 electrolysis at room temperature with an AutoLab PGSTAT128N potentiostat. A Pt mesh was used as the counter electrode, and a leak-free Ag/AgCl electrode (LF-1, Innovative Instruments, Inc.) was used as the reference. CO2RR was carried out in a purified 0.1 M KHCO3 solution by applying a potential between −0.6 and −0.8 V vs RHE under a constant 20 mL/min CO2 flow rate. Prior to the electrochemical reaction, the electrolyte was purified with Chelex 100 Resin (Bio-Rad)[32,33] in order to minimize the effect of metal impurities in the electrolyte and subsequently purged with CO2 gas (99.95%) for 30 min to reach a pH value of 6.8. The gas products were injected into an online gas chromatograph (Agilent 7890A) every 17 min during CO2RR. Liquid products such as formate were detected by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC, Shimadzu) after CO2RR. The value of the solution resistance was measured with the iR interrupt method[34] and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. To determine the roughness factor of the catalysts, the double-layer capacitance was measured between 0 and 0.25 V vs RHE after 1 and 20 h of reaction in 0.1 M KHCO3 (Figure S1 and Table S1 in Supporting Information). Operando XANES measurements were conducted with a home-built electrochemical cell using Pt mesh (MaTeck) and leak-free Ag/AgCl as counter and reference electrodes, respectively. The measurements were made in fluorescence mode using a planar implanted silicon (PIPS) detector at the P64 undulator beamline of the PETRA III synchrotron radiation facility.

Results and Discussion

Morphological Characterization

To synthesize stable Ag–Sn CO2RR catalysts, O2-plasma treatments on Ag foils and subsequent Sn electrodeposition were employed. Figure presents SEM images of SnO/Ag and SnO/AgO bimetallic catalysts as prepared (top row) and after 20 h of CO2RR at −0.8 V vs RHE (bottom row). A comparison with a monometallic AgO catalyst is also included. An enhanced surface roughness is observed for all samples resulting from either the O2-plasma pretreatment or the Sn electrodeposition. On the basis of the roughness factors extracted from electrochemical double-layer capacitance measurements, the roughness was found to increase in the order of AgO > SnO/AgO > SnO/Ag > metallic Ag foil (Figure S1 and Table S1).
Figure 1

SEM images of AgOx (a, d), SnOx/AgOx (b, e), and SnOx/Ag (c, f) catalysts acquired before (a–c) and after CO2RR at −0.8 V vs RHE for 20 h (d–f). The average values of the composition extracted from SEM-EDS measurements are also shown. The scale bars indicate 20 μm. The insets show higher-magnification images (scale bars, 2 μm).

SEM images of AgOx (a, d), SnOx/AgOx (b, e), and SnOx/Ag (c, f) catalysts acquired before (a–c) and after CO2RR at −0.8 V vs RHE for 20 h (d–f). The average values of the composition extracted from SEM-EDS measurements are also shown. The scale bars indicate 20 μm. The insets show higher-magnification images (scale bars, 2 μm). A strong change in the morphology of the AgO (Figure d) and SnO/AgO (Figure e) samples occurs after 20 h of CO2RR, while the surface of the SnO/Ag sample (Figure f) is only mildly altered under reduction reaction conditions. The SnO/AgO sample already shows a slight change in surface roughness after 1 h of reaction (Figure S2). Our EDS analysis shows that the entire surface of the Ag and AgO substrates was covered with Sn.

Chemical State/Surface Composition Characterization

To gain further information on the chemical state of the Ag–Sn bimetallic catalysts as prepared and after reaction, quasi in situ XPS measurements were carried out on the SnO/AgO and SnO/Ag samples before and after CO2RR at −0.8 V versus RHE in an electrochemical cell directly attached to the XPS system. As expected, after O2-plasma treatment the Ag substrate is oxidized. (See the Ag MNN Auger spectra in Figure S3.) Nevertheless, after the in situ Sn electrodeposition, only metallic Ag is seen. This is directly linked to the strong reductive alkaline conditions employed during the Sn electrodeposition.[35] Moreover, it should be noted that the deposition process does not leave behind any residual Cl, which might influence the CO2RR mechanism (Figures S4 and S6) by decreasing the overpotential for forming the CO2 radical.[11] By comparing the integrated area of the Ag 3d and Sn 3d XPS peaks (Figure S5), the Sn/Ag ratio on the surface of the SnO/AgO and SnO/Ag samples was 1:1 and 3:1 (Table S2), respectively. This ratio is higher than that extracted by EDX because Sn is deposited on top of the Ag substrates and XPS is a more surface-sensitive technique than EDX. Overall, the XPS data reveal that the catalyst surface composition is stable and that there is no evidence of sintering or interdiffusion of the two metals even after 20 h of CO2RR. Figure displays Sn MNN Auger spectra from the SnO/AgO and SnO/Ag samples acquired as prepared and after 1 and 20 h of CO2RR. In both samples, features corresponding to metallic Sn[31] are seen after the reaction, together with SnOx species.[34] The progressive reduction of the SnOx species is observed with increasing reaction time, but there are still Sn oxides present on the surfaces of both samples even after CO2RR at −0.8 V vs RHE for 20 h (Figure and Table S3).
Figure 2

Quasi in situ Sn MNN Auger spectra of Sn electrodeposited on (a) an O2-plasma-treated Ag substrate (AgOx) and (b) a pristine Ag substrate. Colored spectra are Sn MNN reference spectra (metallic Sn, SnO, and SnO2) used to fit the envelope of Auger spectra. Electrochemical CO2RR has been performed at a working potential of −0.81 V vs RHE in 0.1 M KHCO3.

Quasi in situ Sn MNN Auger spectra of Sn electrodeposited on (a) an O2-plasma-treated Ag substrate (AgOx) and (b) a pristine Ag substrate. Colored spectra are Sn MNN reference spectra (metallic Sn, SnO, and SnO2) used to fit the envelope of Auger spectra. Electrochemical CO2RR has been performed at a working potential of −0.81 V vs RHE in 0.1 M KHCO3. Nonetheless, because of the quasi in situ nature of the former measurements and although the samples were never exposed to air during the transfer to the XPS chamber, they were still in contact with the electrolyte after reaction during the transfer (5–15 s) in the absence of an applied potential, which could result in partial reoxidation of the surface Sn species. To confirm that SnOx species indeed remain stable under reaction conditions at the potentials of interest, operando X-ray absorption spectroscopy measurements were also conducted. XANES was used to gain insight into changes in the catalysts chemical state and morphology during CO2RR. It should be noted that this technique is bulk-sensitive, providing information from surface and subsurface sample regions. Furthermore, the fluorescence signal detected here is highly dominated by the radiation emitted by the silver support. Unfortunately, the Ag Kβ emission line (24 941 eV) overlaps with the Sn Kα series (24 735–25 272 eV), making the measurements of these samples at the Sn K edge very challenging. Nevertheless, insight into the chemical state of Sn before and under CO2RR conditions can still be extracted by comparing to reference spectra (Figure ).
Figure 3

(a) Sn K-edge XANES spectra of Sn electrodeposited on O2-plasma-treated Ag (SnO/AgO) and on a pristine Ag foil (SnOx/Ag) measured as-prepared and under CO2RR conditions after 5 h of activation at −0.8 V vs RHE in 0.1 M KHCO3. Reference spectra of the metallic Sn foil, SnO, and SnO2 are also shown. Vertical lines provide a guide for the eye and represent the white line position of the reference Sn foil, of bulk SnO (dashed line), and of bulk SnO2 (dotted line). (b) Sn K-edge XANES spectrum of SnO/AgO (open circles) under CO2RR conditions together with the linear combination fit (red solid line) and the weighted spectral components corresponding to Sn and SnO2 species.

(a) Sn K-edge XANES spectra of Sn electrodeposited on O2-plasma-treated Ag (SnO/AgO) and on a pristine Ag foil (SnOx/Ag) measured as-prepared and under CO2RR conditions after 5 h of activation at −0.8 V vs RHE in 0.1 M KHCO3. Reference spectra of the metallic Sn foil, SnO, and SnO2 are also shown. Vertical lines provide a guide for the eye and represent the white line position of the reference Sn foil, of bulk SnO (dashed line), and of bulk SnO2 (dotted line). (b) Sn K-edge XANES spectrum of SnO/AgO (open circles) under CO2RR conditions together with the linear combination fit (red solid line) and the weighted spectral components corresponding to Sn and SnO2 species. The Sn spectrum of the SnO/Ag sample in Figure a resembles that of the Sn foil, showing a low-intensity feature above the edge (the so-called “white line”) at 29 207.8 eV that barely changes under CO2RR. This indicates that even though the sample surface might be oxidized, the signal of the metallic Sn subsurface layers dominates the XAFS spectrum. On the other hand, the sample deposited on plasma-treated Ag (SnO/AgO) is severely oxidized prior to the reaction as indicated by a more intense white line shifted to 29 209.6 eV. Under the reaction conditions, the white line gets broader but less intense and shifts to slightly lower photon energy. To get quantitative information on the Sn species observed, XANES spectra were fitted using a linear combination (LC) of the reference spectra of a Sn foil, SnO, and SnO2 (Figure b). Because XANES spectra of both oxides show similar features and differ only in the intensity and position of the white line, an energy shift, fitted during linear combination analysis, served as an extra figure of merit along with the R factor. Thus, if two fits, using different oxides as principle components, resulted in similar R-factor values, then the one with a smaller energy shift was accepted. Hence, with these bulk-sensitive techniques, the as-prepared SnO/Ag sample was found to consist of 90% metallic Sn and a 10% mixture of SnO and SnO2 in a 2:1 ratio. (See Table S4 and Figure S7 for details.) The LC analysis proves the full reduction of Sn in this sample under the reaction conditions. The SnO/AgO sample shows more severe oxidation in its as-prepared state, with Sn0 and Sn4+ species present in a ratio close to 1:1. In contrast to the sample supported on pristine Ag, the SnO layer deposited on AgO was not fully reduced after 5 h under CO2RR conditions with 23% of Sn remaining as SnO2. The combined results from XPS (surface-sensitive) and XANES (bulk-dominated) analysis indicate that although the surfaces of the SnOx/Ag and SnOx/AgOx samples are oxidized in their as-prepared states, the oxide layer thickness is not very thick in the case of the SnOx/Ag sample. This is concluded on the basis of the XANES data revealing a mainly reduced sample before and during CO2RR, while only via the more sensitive XPS technique can one detect the partial reduction of the SnOx species during the first 20 h of CO2RR. On the other hand, SnO species were found to remain in the SnO/AgO sample not only at the surface (XPS) but also at the subsurface (XANES) at least within the first 5 h of the reaction.

CO2RR Performance

Figure a shows the selectivity of electrocatalysts toward the main products such as CO, H2, and formate at −0.8 V vs RHE in 0.1 M KHCO3 after 1 h of CO2RR. By utilizing a plasma-oxidized Ag foil as substrate, AgO and SnO/AgO catalysts show outstanding selectivity toward C1 products (∼95% FE) versus the parasitic HER (<5% FE), whereas the SnO/Ag catalyst employing a metallic Ag foil as a support shows a higher FE for HER (30% after 1 h of CO2RR) than on the AgO substrates.
Figure 4

(a) Faradaic efficiencies and (b) partial current densities of AgO, SnO/AgO, SnO/Ag, metallic Ag, and Sn catalysts acquired after 1 h of CO2RR at −0.8 V vs RHE in 0.1 M KHCO3.Each column represents Formate (dotted blue), CO (straight red line), and H2 (gray).

(a) Faradaic efficiencies and (b) partial current densities of AgO, SnO/AgO, SnO/Ag, metallic Ag, and Sn catalysts acquired after 1 h of CO2RR at −0.8 V vs RHE in 0.1 M KHCO3.Each column represents Formate (dotted blue), CO (straight red line), and H2 (gray). A correlation is also found between the roughness and the catalytic activity, with enhanced activity for the rougher surfaces. The O2-plasma treatment, resulting in rough and defect-rich AgO and SnO/AgO surfaces,[23] leads to 2-fold-enhanced catalytic activity as compared to that of analogous but flatter surfaces such as metallic Ag and SnO/Ag, as shown in Figure b. Nevertheless, for samples with similar roughness factors (AgO and SnO/AgO, see Table S1), the product selectivity is strongly affected by the presence of Sn, with the SnO/AgO sample producing more formate than the AgO sample but also generating less H2 when the performance is evaluated over a longer period of time (20 h) (Figure ).
Figure 5

Temporal evolution of the activity and selectivity of different CO2RR catalysts: (a) AgO, (b) SnO/AgO, and (c) SnOx/Ag at −0.8 V vs RHE for 20 h during CO2RR. Green lines indicate the total current densities (left y axis). Faradaic efficiencies (right y axis) of CO (red •) and H2 (■) are also shown. The FE value of HCOO– was obtained after 20 h of CO2RR.

Temporal evolution of the activity and selectivity of different CO2RR catalysts: (a) AgO, (b) SnO/AgO, and (c) SnOx/Ag at −0.8 V vs RHE for 20 h during CO2RR. Green lines indicate the total current densities (left y axis). Faradaic efficiencies (right y axis) of CO (red •) and H2 (■) are also shown. The FE value of HCOO– was obtained after 20 h of CO2RR. Although CO2RR catalysts based on plasma-oxidized Ag substrates display remarkable catalytic activity and selectivity for CO during the first hour of reaction, it is still essential to design stable catalysts that can suppress HER while maintaining the selectivity for C1 products. As can be seen in Figure a, the monometallic AgO catalyst shows a distinct deactivation over time, with an increase in the HER pathway likely due to the decrease in the population of defect sites and the overall decrease in surface roughness with time.[23] In contrast, the SnO/AgO sample is found to be significantly more stable in terms of the total current density and the C1 product conversion while maintaining a constantly low (5%) FE for H2 (Figure b). A possible explanation for the stability of the SnO/AgO sample is that Sn electrodeposition on the rough AgO surface is able to preserve the surface roughness under reaction conditions better than when the AgO surface is uncoated. In fact, according to the roughness factors measured after different reaction times (Table S1), the roughness of the SnO/AgO surface is slightly increased after 20 h of reaction, while a decrease in the roughness is found for the pure AgO, which leads to the loss of highly active defect sites needed for the conversion to C1 products. The increase in the surface roughness reported to occur for SnO surfaces with decreasing oxide layer thickness was previously associated with a shift in surface orientation during electrolytic reduction.[36] Interestingly, the ratio of the selectivity of formate and CO on the SnO/AgO catalyst changed from 1:1 after the first hour of reaction (Figure ) to 1:3 after 20 h of reaction (Figure b) in spite of sustaining ∼95% selectivity for C1 products. This phenomenon can be explained by considering the expected changes in the SnO thickness[25] during CO2RR.[36] For instance, in Cu/Sn core/shell structures, 1.8 nm tin oxide shells are selective to formate, whereas thinner (0.8 nm) oxide shells favor CO formation. The later was explained on the basis of the SnO surface strain leading to a decrease in the overpotential forming intermediates.[25] Another plausible explanation for the temporal evolution of the CO and formate selectivity are morphological alterations (see in Figure b,e and Figure S2) on the sample surface taking place during electrocatalysis. Furthermore, the chemical state of the Sn species deposited on the surface appears to be a particularly important factor in determining the reaction selectivity. An electrode consisting of both Sn0 and Snδ+ (δ = 2, 4) species has shown remarkable catalytic activity and FE toward formate compared to a native SnO or a fresh Sn0 surface.[18] By employing in situ spectroscopic analysis (XPS and XANES), it is confirmed that these oxides at least partially survive under CO2 reduction conditions[37,38] or are present as surface hydroxides in the divalent oxidation state, which has been suggested to play a key role in formate production over SnO thin film electrodes.[39] In summary, the enhanced catalytic selectivity for C1 products is assigned to the stabilization of cationic Sn species on the SnO/AgO samples while maintaining adequate roughness during long-term CO2RR.

Conclusions

Ag–Sn bimetallic catalysts synthesized via Sn electrodeposition on O2-plasma-pretreated Ag foils (SnO/AgO) were found to display enhanced C1 product selectivity (≥95% at −0.8 V vs RHE) during CO2RR while maintaining low HER (<5% after 20 h). In clear contrast, a nearly 40% increase in HER selectivity was obtained for Sn-free AgO during the same period of time. Ex situ SEM showed that the O2-plasma treatment provided a highly roughened surface, while quasi in situ XPS and operando XANES data revealed the presence of cationic Sn species stabilized at the SnO/AgO surface even after prolonged reaction times. Furthermore, such species are found to be much less stable at the SnO/Ag surface. We expect that the findings presented here on the important synergistic interplay between surface roughness and stable Snδ+/Sn species can further guide the rational design of more stable and efficient CO2 electrocatalysts.
  17 in total

1.  Mesostructure-Induced Selectivity in CO2 Reduction Catalysis.

Authors:  Anthony Shoji Hall; Youngmin Yoon; Anna Wuttig; Yogesh Surendranath
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Aqueous CO2 reduction at very low overpotential on oxide-derived Au nanoparticles.

Authors:  Yihong Chen; Christina W Li; Matthew W Kanan
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Electrocatalytic conversion of carbon dioxide to methane and methanol on transition metal surfaces.

Authors:  Kendra P Kuhl; Toru Hatsukade; Etosha R Cave; David N Abram; Jakob Kibsgaard; Thomas F Jaramillo
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  A selective and efficient electrocatalyst for carbon dioxide reduction.

Authors:  Qi Lu; Jonathan Rosen; Yang Zhou; Gregory S Hutchings; Yannick C Kimmel; Jingguang G Chen; Feng Jiao
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  CO2 reduction at low overpotential on Cu electrodes resulting from the reduction of thick Cu2O films.

Authors:  Christina W Li; Matthew W Kanan
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Electroreduction of carbon monoxide to liquid fuel on oxide-derived nanocrystalline copper.

Authors:  Christina W Li; Jim Ciston; Matthew W Kanan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  A highly selective copper-indium bimetallic electrocatalyst for the electrochemical reduction of aqueous CO2 to CO.

Authors:  Shahid Rasul; Dalaver H Anjum; Abdesslem Jedidi; Yury Minenkov; Luigi Cavallo; Kazuhiro Takanabe
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 15.336

8.  Tin oxide dependence of the CO2 reduction efficiency on tin electrodes and enhanced activity for tin/tin oxide thin-film catalysts.

Authors:  Yihong Chen; Matthew W Kanan
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  A Gross-Margin Model for Defining Technoeconomic Benchmarks in the Electroreduction of CO2.

Authors:  Sumit Verma; Byoungsu Kim; Huei-Ru Molly Jhong; Sichao Ma; Paul J A Kenis
Journal:  ChemSusChem       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 8.928

10.  Achieving Selective and Efficient Electrocatalytic Activity for CO2 Reduction Using Immobilized Silver Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Cheonghee Kim; Hyo Sang Jeon; Taedaehyeong Eom; Michael Shincheon Jee; Hyungjun Kim; Cynthia M Friend; Byoung Koun Min; Yun Jeong Hwang
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Rational-Designed Principles for Electrochemical and Photoelectrochemical Upgrading of CO2 to Value-Added Chemicals.

Authors:  Wenjun Zhang; Zhong Jin; Zupeng Chen
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 16.806

2.  Operando Insight into the Correlation between the Structure and Composition of CuZn Nanoparticles and Their Selectivity for the Electrochemical CO2 Reduction.

Authors:  Hyo Sang Jeon; Janis Timoshenko; Fabian Scholten; Ilya Sinev; Antonia Herzog; Felix T Haase; Beatriz Roldan Cuenya
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Anodic SnO2 porous nanostructures with rich grain boundaries for efficient CO2 electroreduction to formate.

Authors:  Ruizhen Ma; Yan-Li Chen; Yongli Shen; Heng Wang; Wei Zhang; Su-Seng Pang; Jianfeng Huang; Yu Han; Yunfeng Zhao
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 3.361

Review 4.  Selective CO2 Electroreduction to Ethylene and Multicarbon Alcohols via Electrolyte-Driven Nanostructuring.

Authors:  Dunfeng Gao; Ilya Sinev; Fabian Scholten; Rosa M Arán-Ais; Nuria J Divins; Kristina Kvashnina; Janis Timoshenko; Beatriz Roldan Cuenya
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 15.336

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.