Literature DB >> 30826706

Hazard of a neonicotinoid insecticide on the homing flight of the honeybee depends on climatic conditions and Varroa infestation.

Coline Monchanin1, Mickaël Henry2, Axel Decourtye3, Anne Dalmon2, Dominique Fortini4, Elodie Bœuf2, Ludovic Dubuisson5, Pierrick Aupinel4, Colombe Chevallereau4, Julie Petit5, Julie Fourrier6.   

Abstract

The paradigm for all toxicological bioassays in the risk assessment of pesticide registration reflects the principle that experimental conditions should be controlled to avoid any other factors that may affect the endpoint measures. As honeybee colonies can be frequently exposed to bio-aggressors in real conditions, often concomitantly with pesticides, co-exposure to pesticide/bio-aggressors is becoming a concern for regulatory authorities. We investigated the effects of the neonicotinoid insecticide thiamethoxam on the homing performances of foragers emerging from colonies differentiated by health status (infestation with Varroa destructor mites, microsporidian parasite Nosema spp. and Deformed Wing Virus). We designed a homing test that has been recently identified to fill a regulatory gap in the field evaluations of sublethal doses of pesticides before their registration. We also assessed the effect of temperature as an environmental factor. Our results showed that the Varroa mite exacerbates homing failure (HF) caused by the insecticide, whereas high temperatures reduce insecticide-induced HF. Through an analytical Effective Dose (ED) approach, predictive modeling results showed that, for instance, ED level of an uninfested colony, can be divided by 3.3 when the colony is infested by 5 Varroa mites per 100 bees and at a temperature of 24 °C. Our results suggest that the health status of honeybee colonies and climatic context should be targeted for a thorough risk assessment.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Climatic conditions; Combined sublethal effects; Homing flight; Honey bee health; Risk assessment; Varroa infestation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30826706     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.02.129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  5 in total

1.  Neonicotinoid Clothianidin reduces honey bee immune response and contributes to Varroa mite proliferation.

Authors:  Desiderato Annoscia; Gennaro Di Prisco; Andrea Becchimanzi; Emilio Caprio; Davide Frizzera; Alberto Linguadoca; Francesco Nazzi; Francesco Pennacchio
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 2.  Review on Sublethal Effects of Environmental Contaminants in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera), Knowledge Gaps and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Agata Di Noi; Silvia Casini; Tommaso Campani; Giampiero Cai; Ilaria Caliani
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  A derived honey bee stock confers resistance to Varroa destructor and associated viral transmission.

Authors:  Thomas A O'Shea-Wheller; Frank D Rinkevich; Robert G Danka; Michael Simone-Finstrom; Philip G Tokarz; Kristen B Healy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Varroa destructor: how does it harm Apis mellifera honey bees and what can be done about it?

Authors:  Amélie Noël; Yves Le Conte; Fanny Mondet
Journal:  Emerg Top Life Sci       Date:  2020-07-02

5.  ColEval: Honeybee COLony Structure EVALuation for Field Surveys.

Authors:  Julie Hernandez; Alban Maisonnasse; Marianne Cousin; Constance Beri; Corentin Le Quintrec; Anthony Bouetard; David Castex; Damien Decante; Eloïs Servel; Gerald Buchwalder; François Brunet; Estelle Feschet-Destrella; Kiliana de Bellescize; Guillaume Kairo; Léa Frontero; Miren Pédehontaa-Hiaa; Robin Buisson; Theo Pouderoux; Alexandre Aebi; André Kretzschmar
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2020-01-05       Impact factor: 2.769

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.