Mickael Vourc'h1, Eric Dailly2, Yannick Hourmant1, Ronan Bellouard2, Pierre-Joachim Mahe1, Guillaume Deslandes2, Matthieu Grégoire2, Karim Asehnoune3. 1. Departments of Anesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care, Hôtel-Dieu, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France. 2. Clinical Pharmacology Department, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France. 3. Departments of Anesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care, Hôtel-Dieu, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France; Department of Anesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care, Hôtel-Dieu, University Hospital of Nantes, 44093 Nantes, France. Electronic address: karim.asehnoune@chu-nantes.fr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High-dose baclofen could prove beneficial in patients with unhealthy alcohol use in intensive care units (ICU). However, the pharmacokinetic properties of baclofen are unknown in this population. Our objectives were to investigate the pharmacokinetics of baclofen and the relationship between baclofen exposure and its toxicity in the ICU. MATERIALS AND METHODS: As part of a healthcare quality improvement project, we conducted a prospective, single-center study in a surgical intensive care unit at Nantes University Hospital in order to assess our local protocol of sedation in patients with consumption of alcohol above the recommended limits by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA). Baclofen pharmacokinetics were investigated by a non-compartment analysis and a population approach in 20 patients under mechanical ventilation. After a baclofen loading dose on day 1, daily doses were divided into 3 intakes adapted to glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and blood samples were withdrawn on day 3 for pharmacokinetic analysis. Baclofen was administered until extubation or tracheostomy and agitation-related events as well as the potential side effects of baclofen were noted. RESULTS: In this population, pharmacokinetic parameters [absorption latency time = 0.37 h, absorption constant rate = 2.2 h-1, apparent volume of distribution = 105 L, apparent clearance (l/h) = 13.5 × (GFR/103)0.839] were characterized by modified absorption and the influence of renal function: renal failure significantly increased baclofen exposure (p = .007) and significantly decreased baclofen clearance (p = .007) compared with patients without renal failure. When comparing patients with or without possible signs of baclofen toxicity, no difference was found regarding baclofen exposure (p = .34) and plasma peak concentration (p = .26). CONCLUSIONS: The a priori planned algorithm for dose adaptation according to renal clearance appeared to be suitable in our population. Daily administration of 150 mg of baclofen in ICU patients with preserved renal function did not lead to toxic concentrations in the plasma. A dose reduction of approximately 40%, 60% and 70% in patients with mild, moderate and severe renal failure could be suggested.
BACKGROUND: High-dose baclofen could prove beneficial in patients with unhealthy alcohol use in intensive care units (ICU). However, the pharmacokinetic properties of baclofen are unknown in this population. Our objectives were to investigate the pharmacokinetics of baclofen and the relationship between baclofen exposure and its toxicity in the ICU. MATERIALS AND METHODS: As part of a healthcare quality improvement project, we conducted a prospective, single-center study in a surgical intensive care unit at Nantes University Hospital in order to assess our local protocol of sedation in patients with consumption of alcohol above the recommended limits by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA). Baclofen pharmacokinetics were investigated by a non-compartment analysis and a population approach in 20 patients under mechanical ventilation. After a baclofen loading dose on day 1, daily doses were divided into 3 intakes adapted to glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and blood samples were withdrawn on day 3 for pharmacokinetic analysis. Baclofen was administered until extubation or tracheostomy and agitation-related events as well as the potential side effects of baclofen were noted. RESULTS: In this population, pharmacokinetic parameters [absorption latency time = 0.37 h, absorption constant rate = 2.2 h-1, apparent volume of distribution = 105 L, apparent clearance (l/h) = 13.5 × (GFR/103)0.839] were characterized by modified absorption and the influence of renal function: renal failure significantly increased baclofen exposure (p = .007) and significantly decreased baclofen clearance (p = .007) compared with patients without renal failure. When comparing patients with or without possible signs of baclofentoxicity, no difference was found regarding baclofen exposure (p = .34) and plasma peak concentration (p = .26). CONCLUSIONS: The a priori planned algorithm for dose adaptation according to renal clearance appeared to be suitable in our population. Daily administration of 150 mg of baclofen in ICU patients with preserved renal function did not lead to toxic concentrations in the plasma. A dose reduction of approximately 40%, 60% and 70% in patients with mild, moderate and severe renal failure could be suggested.