Literature DB >> 30826387

Comparison of the efficiency of chopped and non-rectangular electrical stimulus waveforms in activating small vagus nerve fibers.

Mélissa Dali1, Chloé Picq2, Olivier Rossel3, Pawel Maciejasz4, Charles-Henri Malbert5, David Guiraud6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the context of morbid obesity, vagus nerve stimulation could be used to control gastric function targeting the small afferent B-fibers and C-fibers. Compared to large A-fibers, activation thresholds of these small efferent fibers are 10 to 100 times greater, inducing technical constraints and possible nerve damages. Although rectangular waveform is commonly used in nerve stimulation, recent modeling and experimental studies suggest that non-rectangular waveforms could reduced the charge injected by the stimulator. NEW
METHOD: The objective of the present study is to evaluate the charge injection of complex waveforms such as the ramp, quarter sine and chopped pulses in the context of vagus nerve stimulation. We performed in-vivo study on the porcine abdominal vagus nerves and evaluated charge injection at activation thresholds. A modeling study was performed to further extent the results obtained in-vivo. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING
METHOD: Compared to the rectangular pulse, the ramp and quarter sine waveforms activated gastric fibers with the lowest charge injection: -23.2% and -30.1% respectively. The efficacy of chopped pulses is questioned through the consideration of the strength-duration curve.
CONCLUSION: Continuous ramp and quarter sine waveforms effectively activate small diameter fibers. These pulse shapes may be considered for long-term vagus nerve stimulation. The results predicted by computational models were qualitatively consistent with experiments. This suggested the relevance of using modeling in the context of complex waveforms prior to future in-vivo tests.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Burst waveforms; Chopped pulses; Compound action potential; Nerve modeling; Neuromodulation; Obesity; Vagus nerve stimulation

Year:  2019        PMID: 30826387     DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.02.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  3 in total

1.  A fully implantable wireless bidirectional neuromodulation system for mice.

Authors:  Jason P Wright; Ibrahim T Mughrabi; Jason Wong; Jose Mathew; Naveen Jayaprakash; Christine Crosfield; Eric H Chang; Sangeeta S Chavan; Kevin J Tracey; Valentin A Pavlov; Yousef Al-Abed; Theodoros P Zanos; Stavros Zanos; Timir Datta-Chaudhuri
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 12.545

Review 2.  Selective Neuromodulation of the Vagus Nerve.

Authors:  Adam Fitchett; Svetlana Mastitskaya; Kirill Aristovich
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  Quantitative comparisons of block thresholds and onset responses for charge-balanced kilohertz frequency waveforms.

Authors:  Edgar Peña; Nicole A Pelot; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 5.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.