Literature DB >> 30826385

Mechanisms of soft and hard electrophile toxicities.

Richard M LoPachin1, Brian C Geohagen2, Lars U Nordstroem3.   

Abstract

Electron-deficient chemicals (electrophiles) react with compounds that have one or more unshared valence electron pairs (nucleophiles). The resulting covalent reactions between electrophiles and nucleophiles (e.g., Michael addition, SN2 reactions) are important, not only to Organic Chemistry, but also to the fields of Molecular Biology and Toxicology. Specifically, covalent bond formation is the operational basis of many critically important cellular processes; e.g., enzyme function, neurotransmitter release, and membrane-vesicle fusion. Given this context it is understandable that these reactions are also relevant to Toxicology, since a significant number of xenobiotic chemicals are toxic electrophiles that can react with endogenous nucleophilic residues. Therefore, the purpose of this Review is to discuss electrophile-nucleophile chemistry as it pertains to cell injury and resulting organ toxicity. Our discussion will involve an introduction to the Hard and Soft, Acids and Bases (HSAB) theory of Pearson. The HSAB concept provides a framework for calculation of quantum chemical parameters that classify the electrophile and nucleophile covalent components according to their respective electronic nature (softness/hardness) and reactivity (electrophilicity/nucleophilicity). The calculated quantum indices in conjunction with corroborative in vivo, in chemico (cell free) and in vitro research can offer an illuminating approach to mechanistic discovery. Accordingly, we will provide examples that demonstrate how this approach has been used to discern mechanisms and sites of electrophile action.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electrophilic toxicants; Environmental pollution; Nucleophiles; Toxicity; type-2 alkenes; α,β-unsaturated aldehydes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30826385      PMCID: PMC6494464          DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2019.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicology        ISSN: 0300-483X            Impact factor:   4.221


  85 in total

Review 1.  Role of nitric oxide in the regulation of monoaminergic neurotransmission.

Authors:  J P Kiss
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 2.  Mechanisms of signal transduction mediated by oxidized lipids: the role of the electrophile-responsive proteome.

Authors:  E K Ceaser; D R Moellering; S Shiva; A Ramachandran; A Landar; A Venkartraman; J Crawford; R Patel; D A Dickinson; E Ulasova; S Ji; V M Darley-Usmar
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.407

3.  Covalent modification of amino acid nucleophiles by the lipid peroxidation products 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal and 4-oxo-2-nonenal.

Authors:  Jonathan A Doorn; Dennis R Petersen
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 4.  The molecular effects of acrolein.

Authors:  J P Kehrer; S S Biswal
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Covalent adduction of nucleophilic amino acids by 4-hydroxynonenal and 4-oxononenal.

Authors:  Jonathan A Doorn; Dennis R Petersen
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 5.192

6.  Neurological evaluation of toxic axonopathies in rats: acrylamide and 2,5-hexanedione.

Authors:  R M LoPachin; J F Ross; M L Reid; S Das; S Mansukhani; E J Lehning
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.294

Review 7.  Acrylamide axonopathy revisited.

Authors:  R M LoPachin; C D Balaban; J F Ross
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 8.  gamma-Diketone neuropathy: axon atrophy and the role of cytoskeletal protein adduction.

Authors:  Richard M LoPachin; Anthony P DeCaprio
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 4.219

9.  In vivo and in vitro effects of acrylamide on synaptosomal neurotransmitter uptake and release.

Authors:  Richard M LoPachin; Aron I Schwarcz; Christopher L Gaughan; Shirley Mansukhani; Soma Das
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.294

Review 10.  Hazardous air pollutants and asthma.

Authors:  George D Leikauf
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  13 in total

1.  Acute in vitro effects on embryonic rat dorsal root ganglion (DRG) cultures by in silico predicted neurotoxic chemicals: Evaluations on cytotoxicity, neurite length, and neurophysiology.

Authors:  Andrew F M Johnstone; Cina M Mack; Matthew C Valdez; Timothy J Shafer; Richard M LoPachin; David W Herr; Prasada Rao S Kodavanti
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.500

2.  Application of the hard and soft, acids and bases (HSAB) theory as a method to predict cumulative neurotoxicity.

Authors:  Fjodor Melnikov; Brian C Geohagen; Terrence Gavin; Richard M LoPachin; Paul T Anastas; Phillip Coish; David W Herr
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 4.294

Review 3.  Drug discovery from natural products - Old problems and novel solutions for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Urmila Maitra; Cayman Stephen; Lukasz M Ciesla
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 3.935

4.  In Silico Approaches In Carcinogenicity Hazard Assessment: Current Status and Future Needs.

Authors:  Raymond R Tice; Arianna Bassan; Alexander Amberg; Lennart T Anger; Marc A Beal; Phillip Bellion; Romualdo Benigni; Jeffrey Birmingham; Alessandro Brigo; Frank Bringezu; Lidia Ceriani; Ian Crooks; Kevin Cross; Rosalie Elespuru; David M Faulkner; Marie C Fortin; Paul Fowler; Markus Frericks; Helga H J Gerets; Gloria D Jahnke; David R Jones; Naomi L Kruhlak; Elena Lo Piparo; Juan Lopez-Belmonte; Amarjit Luniwal; Alice Luu; Federica Madia; Serena Manganelli; Balasubramanian Manickam; Jordi Mestres; Amy L Mihalchik-Burhans; Louise Neilson; Arun Pandiri; Manuela Pavan; Cynthia V Rider; John P Rooney; Alejandra Trejo-Martin; Karen H Watanabe-Sailor; Angela T White; David Woolley; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2021-09-23

5.  In vivo neurophysiological assessment of in silico predictions of neurotoxicity: Citronellal, 3,4-dichloro-1-butene, and benzyl bromoacetate.

Authors:  Garyn L Jung; Katherine L McDaniel; Richard M LoPachin; Brian C Geohagen; Alicia Smith; Mitchell Huffstickler; David W Herr
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  An eco-friendly solvent-free reaction based on peptide probes: design an extraction-free method for analysis of acrylamide under microliter volume.

Authors:  Yi-Shan Li; Jau-Ling Suen; Wei-Lung Tseng; Chi-Yu Lu
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 4.478

7.  Enolate-forming compounds provide protection from platinum neurotoxicity.

Authors:  Brian C Geohagen; Daniel A Weiser; David M Loeb; Lars U Nordstroem; Richard M LoPachin
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 5.192

Review 8.  The endoplasmic reticulum participated in drug metabolic toxicity.

Authors:  Qingcai Huang; Youwen Chen; Zhengjia Zhang; Zeyu Xue; Zhenglai Hua; Xinyi Luo; Yang Li; Cheng Lu; Aiping Lu; Yuanyan Liu
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 6.691

Review 9.  Quo vadis blood protein adductomics?

Authors:  Gabriele Sabbioni; Billy W Day
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 5.153

10.  Decoding Aging: Understanding the Complex Relationship among Aging, Free Radicals, and GSH.

Authors:  María E López-Navarro; Mariana Jarquín-Martínez; Luis A Sánchez-Labastida; Daniel Ramírez-Rosales; Marycarmen Godínez-Victoria; Laura Itzel Quintas-Granados; José Guadalupe Trujillo-Ferrara
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 6.543

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.