Literature DB >> 30825685

U.S. farmers' opinions on the use of nontraditional water sources for agricultural activities.

Mayhah R Suri1, Jessica L Dery2, Joanne Pérodin3, Natalie Brassill2, Xin He4, Samantha Ammons4, Megan E Gerdes4, Channah Rock2, Rachel E Rosenberg Goldstein5.   

Abstract

Water is a key resource for agricultural production in the United States. Due to projected changes in water availability across the country, long-term sustainability of agricultural production may rely on finding alternatives to traditional water sources. The aim of this study was to assess farmers' opinions on the use of nontraditional water sources (e.g., agricultural runoff, treated wastewater, recycled water, produced water, untreated surface water, and brackish surface and groundwater) for agricultural activities. A survey was distributed to farmers (n = 746) in the Mid-Atlantic and Southwest regions of the United States (U.S.) about water availability and nontraditional irrigation water perceptions. Chi-square, Fisher's exact tests, f-tests, and multinomial and ordinal logistic regression analyses were conducted. Of farmers surveyed, 80% (431/543) considered the use of nontraditional water sources to be at least moderately important and 61% (444/727) would use nontraditional water if given the option. Each of the following factors individually increased the likelihood that a farmer considered nontraditional water very important for agriculture: Farmers who lived in the Southwest region compared to the Mid-Atlantic, farmers who were concerned about water availability compared with those who were not, farmers with a graduate or professional degree compared to those with less education, farmers with access to nontraditional water, and farmers with some knowledge of nontraditional water compared to those with no reported knowledge. Concern about water availability and knowledge of nontraditional water sources were significantly associated with willingness to use these water sources (p < 0.001 for both). Water quality, food safety and health risks were the main concerns regarding nontraditional water use across both regions. Willingness to use nontraditional water increased significantly if the water quality was proven to be as good or better than farmers' current water sources (63% vs. 84%; p < 0.001). Projects focused on nontraditional water use in agriculture should be regionally tailored as our data found significant differences between farmers in two distinct U.S. regions.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agriculture; Climate change; Reclaimed water; Water availability; Water management

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30825685     DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.02.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  2 in total

1.  Longitudinal Assessment of the Dynamics of Escherichia coli, Total Coliforms, Enterococcus spp., and Aeromonas spp. in Alternative Irrigation Water Sources: a CONSERVE Study.

Authors:  Sultana Solaiman; Sarah M Allard; Mary Theresa Callahan; Chengsheng Jiang; Eric Handy; Cheryl East; Joseph Haymaker; Anthony Bui; Hillary Craddock; Rianna Murray; Prachi Kulkarni; Brienna Anderson-Coughlin; Shani Craighead; Samantha Gartley; Adam Vanore; Rico Duncan; Derek Foust; Maryam Taabodi; Amir Sapkota; Eric May; Fawzy Hashem; Salina Parveen; Kalmia Kniel; Manan Sharma; Amy R Sapkota; Shirley A Micallef
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  "Zooming" Our Way through Virtual Undergraduate Research Training: A Successful Redesign of the CONSERVE Summer Internship Program.

Authors:  Leena Malayil; Masoud Negahban-Azar; Rachel Rosenberg Goldstein; Manan Sharma; Jeanne Gleason; Amy Muise; Rianna Murray; Amy R Sapkota
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2021-03-31
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.