Literature DB >> 30825457

Do sex differences in chronic disease underpin the sex-frailty paradox?

E H Gordon1, R E Hubbard2.   

Abstract

The 'male-female health-survival paradox' is a well-described clinical phenomenon. More recently, it has been conceptualized as a 'sex-frailty paradox': females may be considered to be more frail (because they have poorer health status) but also less frail (because they are less vulnerable to death) than males of the same age. Here, we review potential biological, behavioral and social mechanisms underpinning sex differences in morbidity, mortality and frailty before considering the question at the center of the sex paradox - why is it that females are able to tolerate poor health better than males? We explore, in detail, a frequently cited explanation for the sex paradox that centers on sex differences in chronic disease and conclude by presenting a new approach to this old hypothesis.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic disease; Frailty; Male-female health-survival paradox; Sex differences

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30825457     DOI: 10.1016/j.mad.2019.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev        ISSN: 0047-6374            Impact factor:   5.432


  12 in total

Review 1.  Pathobiology of frailty in lung disease.

Authors:  Brittany Koons; John R Greenland; Joshua M Diamond; Jonathan P Singer
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2020-05-03       Impact factor: 7.012

2.  Sex differences in biological aging with a focus on human studies.

Authors:  Sara Hägg; Juulia Jylhävä
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  In-depth immune cellular profiling reveals sex-specific associations with frailty.

Authors:  Leonard Daniël Samson; A Mieke H Boots; José A Ferreira; H Susan J Picavet; Lia G H de Rond; Mary-Lène de Zeeuw-Brouwer; W M Monique Verschuren; Anne-Marie Buisman; Peter Engelfriet
Journal:  Immun Ageing       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 6.400

4.  Health and care service utilisation and cost over the life-span: a descriptive analysis of population data.

Authors:  Jorid Kalseth; Thomas Halvorsen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Age, Sex and Overall Health, Measured As Frailty, Modify Myofilament Proteins in Hearts From Naturally Aging Mice.

Authors:  Alice E Kane; Elise S Bisset; Kaitlyn M Keller; Anjali Ghimire; W Glen Pyle; Susan E Howlett
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Sex differences in clinical phenotype and transitions of care among individuals dying of COVID-19 in Italy.

Authors:  Valeria Raparelli; Luigi Palmieri; Marco Canevelli; Flavia Pricci; Brigid Unim; Cinzia Lo Noce; Emanuele R Villani; Paula A Rochon; Louise Pilote; Nicola Vanacore; Graziano Onder
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 5.027

7.  Factors Associated with Frailty According to Gender of Older Adults Living Alone.

Authors:  Hye-Young Jang; Ji-Hye Kim
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-16

Review 8.  Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Cardiovascular Risk Marker May Be Less Efficient in Women Than in Men.

Authors:  Ljiljana Trtica Majnarić; Silva Guljaš; Zvonimir Bosnić; Vatroslav Šerić; Thomas Wittlinger
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-04-02

9.  Maladaptive Changes Associated With Cardiac Aging Are Sex-Specific and Graded by Frailty and Inflammation in C57BL/6 Mice.

Authors:  Alice E Kane; Elise S Bisset; Stefan Heinze-Milne; Kaitlyn M Keller; Scott A Grandy; Susan E Howlett
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 6.053

10.  Sex Difference in the Case Fatality of Older Myocardial Infarction Patients.

Authors:  Ville Kytö; Maria Nuotio; Päivi Rautava
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 6.053

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.