Jorge J De La Chapa1, Prajjal K Singha2, Kristen K Self1, McKay L Sallaway1, Stanton F McHardy3,4, Matthew J Hart4,5, Howard Stan McGuff2, Matthew C Valdez3, Francisco Ruiz3, Srikanth R Polusani5, Cara B Gonzales1,4. 1. Department of Comprehensive Dentistry, School of Dentistry, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas. 2. Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas. 3. Center for Innovative Drug Discovery, Department of Chemistry, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas. 4. Mays Cancer Center, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas. 5. Center for Innovative Drug Discovery, HTS Facility, Department of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a deadly disease with a mere 40% five-year survival rate for patients with advanced disease. Previously, we discovered that capsazepine (CPZ), a transient receptor potential channel, Vanilloid subtype 1 (TRPV1) antagonist, has significant anti-tumor effects against OSCC via a unique mechanism-of-action that is independent of TRPV1. Thus, we developed novel CPZ analogs with more potent anti-proliferative effects (CIDD-24, CIDD-99, and CIDD-111). METHODS: Using OSCC xenograft models, we determined the efficacy of these analogs in vivo. TRPV1 interactions were evaluated using calcium imaging and a rat model of orofacial pain. Anti-cancer mechanism(s)-of-action were assessed by cell cycle analysis and mitochondrial depolarization assays. RESULTS: CIDD-99 was the most potent analog demonstrating significant anti-tumor effects in vivo (P < 0.001). CIDD-24 was equipotent to the parent compound CPZ, but less potent than CIDD-99. CIDD-111 was the least efficacious analog. Calcium imaging studies confirmed that CIDD-99 neither activates nor inhibits TRPV1 confirming that TRPV1 activity is not involved in its anti-cancer effects. All analogs induced an S-phase block, dose-dependent mitochondrial depolarization, and apoptosis. Histological analyses revealed increased apoptosis and reduced cell proliferation in tumors treated with these analogs. Importantly, CIDD-99 had the most dramatic anti-tumor effects with 85% of tumors resolving leaving only minute traces of viable tissue. Additionally, CIDD-99 was non-noxious and demonstrated no observable adverse reactions CONCLUSION: This study describes a novel, highly efficacious, CPZ analog, CIDD-99, with dramatic anti-tumor effects against OSCC that may be efficacious as a lone therapy or in combination with standard therapies.
BACKGROUND:Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a deadly disease with a mere 40% five-year survival rate for patients with advanced disease. Previously, we discovered that capsazepine (CPZ), a transient receptor potential channel, Vanilloid subtype 1 (TRPV1) antagonist, has significant anti-tumor effects against OSCC via a unique mechanism-of-action that is independent of TRPV1. Thus, we developed novel CPZ analogs with more potent anti-proliferative effects (CIDD-24, CIDD-99, and CIDD-111). METHODS: Using OSCC xenograft models, we determined the efficacy of these analogs in vivo. TRPV1 interactions were evaluated using calcium imaging and a rat model of orofacial pain. Anti-cancer mechanism(s)-of-action were assessed by cell cycle analysis and mitochondrial depolarization assays. RESULTS:CIDD-99 was the most potent analog demonstrating significant anti-tumor effects in vivo (P < 0.001). CIDD-24 was equipotent to the parent compound CPZ, but less potent than CIDD-99. CIDD-111 was the least efficacious analog. Calcium imaging studies confirmed that CIDD-99 neither activates nor inhibits TRPV1 confirming that TRPV1 activity is not involved in its anti-cancer effects. All analogs induced an S-phase block, dose-dependent mitochondrial depolarization, and apoptosis. Histological analyses revealed increased apoptosis and reduced cell proliferation in tumors treated with these analogs. Importantly, CIDD-99 had the most dramatic anti-tumor effects with 85% of tumors resolving leaving only minute traces of viable tissue. Additionally, CIDD-99 was non-noxious and demonstrated no observable adverse reactions CONCLUSION: This study describes a novel, highly efficacious, CPZ analog, CIDD-99, with dramatic anti-tumor effects against OSCC that may be efficacious as a lone therapy or in combination with standard therapies.
Authors: Andriani Athanasiou; Paul A Smith; Sara Vakilpour; Nethia M Kumaran; Amy E Turner; Dimitra Bagiokou; Robert Layfield; David E Ray; Andrew D Westwell; Stephen P H Alexander; David A Kendall; Dileep N Lobo; Susan A Watson; Artitaya Lophatanon; Kenneth A Muir; De-An Guo; Timothy E Bates Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 2007-01-02 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: José Baselga; José M Trigo; Jean Bourhis; Jacques Tortochaux; Hernán Cortés-Funes; Ricardo Hitt; Pere Gascón; Nadia Amellal; Andreas Harstrick; André Eckardt Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-07-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: X León; R Hitt; M Constenla; A Rocca; R Stupp; A F Kovács; N Amellal; E H Bessa; J Bourhis Journal: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 4.126
Authors: Steve McGaraughty; Jason A Segreti; Ryan M Fryer; Brian S Brown; Connie R Faltynek; Philip R Kym Journal: Brain Res Date: 2009-02-21 Impact factor: 3.252
Authors: Francesco Ziglioli; Antonio Frattini; Umberto Maestroni; Francesco Dinale; Matteo Ciufifeda; Pietro Cortellini Journal: Acta Biomed Date: 2009-04
Authors: Alexandre A Steiner; Victoria F Turek; Maria C Almeida; Jeffrey J Burmeister; Daniela L Oliveira; Jennifer L Roberts; Anthony W Bannon; Mark H Norman; Jean-Claude Louis; James J S Treanor; Narender R Gavva; Andrej A Romanovsky Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2007-07-11 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Jay Morris; Cara B Gonzales; Jorge J De La Chapa; April B Cabang; Christos Fountzilas; Mandakini Patel; Stephanie Orozco; Michael J Wargovich Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2019-09-13 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Yuyang Sun; Emily K Zboril; Jorge J De La Chapa; Xiufang Chai; Viviane Nascimento Da Conceicao; Matthew C Valdez; Stanton F McHardy; Cara B Gonzales; Brij B Singh Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2022-09-15 Impact factor: 4.755