Tahereh Zare1, Reza Fardid2,3, Samaneh Naderi4. 1. Department of Radiology, School of Paramedical Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. 2. Department of Radiology, School of Paramedical Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. electronic address: rfardid@sums.ac.ir. 3. Ionizing and Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection Research Center (INIRPRC), Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. 4. Diagnostic Laboratory Sciences and Technology Research Center, School of Paramedical Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
In recent years nanotechnology has attracted a great
deal of attention in numerous fields such as biochemistry,
physics, biology, material science etc. (1). Over past decades,
silver (Ag) has been the subject of extensive research for
antibacterial and anti-fungal purposes (2). Ag is of particular
interest in health care, the food industry, water purification, and
household products (3, 4). One of the applications of Ag NPs
in medicine is for cancer treatment (5, 6). Nowadays the use of
Ag at the nano scale has increased due to recent development
in nanotechnology. Previously, silver was considered as a nontoxic
metal; however, recent studies have shown that Ag is the
second most harmful metal after mercury to freshwater fish
and invertebrates (7-9). Nanoparticles (NPs) are commonly
considered to be more toxic than micro-sized particles due
to their individual physicochemical characteristics, and the
small size of the particles (10). Therefore, the toxicity of
Ag nanoparticles (Ag NPs) must be determined for safe and
effective usage, especially in mammalian cells because Ag
NPs dissolve into Ag ions (11), and can directly bind to RNA
polymerase, leading to the inhabitation of RNA polymerase
activity, and over all RNA transcription. This is process is
separate from the cytotoxic effects of Ag ions (12).Sunlight ultraviolet (UV) radiation can have harmful
effects on all living organisms including animals and
humans (13). Generally, UV radiation is divided in to
three segments based on the wavelength: ultraviolet
type A (UVA) (320-400 nm), ultraviolet type B (UVB)
(280-320 nm) and ultraviolet type C (UVC) (200-280
nm). UVA and UVB penetrate the ozone layer and have
significance physiological effects (14), but UVC is
absorbed by the ozone layer and cannot reach the surface
of the earth. One of the main applications of UVC is
in disinfection technologies for water and liquid food
products due to its advantages over alternatives (15).
UVC has an antimicrobial effect on different types of
microorganisms due to photochemical changes induced
in the pyrimidines of DNA and RNA (16). DNA breaks
produced by UV radiation, prevent DNA replication and
transcription leading to impaired cellular function, and
eventually cell death (17). It can therefore also be used in
treating cancer. The lethal effects of UV radiation depend
on the radiation doseage, and the capability of the cell to
repair the damage (16).Many studies have been conducted to investigate the
genotoxic effects of Ag NPs by evaluating .-H2AX as a
marker for detecting DNA double strand breaks (DSB)
in mammalian cells (10, 18, 19). However, the genotoxic
effects of Ag NPs in combination with UV radiation in
humans have not been determined yet.As mentioned above UVC irradiation and Ag NPs can
be used in cancer therapy. In this study we evaluate the
effect of Ag NPs as a sensitizer to UVC irradiation in order
to kill cancer cells. The present study aimed to investigate
the genotoxic effects of Ag NPs in combination with UVC
irradiation via evaluating H2AX gene expression. To do
this, human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells were pretreated
with Ag NPs (~20 nm) followed by exposure to UVC
irradiation. Next, we measured the H2AX gene expression
in TK6 cells via quantitative real time polymerase chain
reaction (qRT-PCR) to determine the synergistic effects
of treatment with Ag NPs plus UVC radiation at 1 and 24
hours post UVC irradiation.
Materials and Methods
Cell culture
In this experimental study, the human lymphoblastoid
TK6 cell line was purchased from American Type Culture
Collection (ATCC® CRL-8015TM) and were maintained in
RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco, USA) supplemented with
10% heat incubated fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco,
USA) and 100 U/ml of penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco,
USA), and incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere
containing 5% CO2. Cells in the exponential growth phase
were used in this study. To maintain a culture density of
less than 1.2×106 cell/ml, TK6 cells were sub cultured
every 2-3 days.
Ag NPs preparation
Ag NPs (~20 nm: according to Transmission Electron
Microscopy (TEM) and XRD pattern by US Research
Nanomaterials) were purchased from the US Research
Nanomaterials Inc. (Stock#: US1038). To do this study,
Ag NPs were suspended in deionized water, and various
concentrations were prepared (0, 5, 10 and 15 µg/ml
in each well). Ag NPs were immediately sonicating
(Hielscher ultrasound technology, UP100H, Germany)
before being applied to cells.
Treatment with Ag NPs and UVC irradiation
Cells were treated with different concentrations of Ag
NPs for 1hr, and then exposed 20 minutes to a germicidal
UVC lamp (λ~254 nm) at 1 mW/cm2, which was
determined with a radiometer (UV-254, Lutron, Taiwan).
The cells were returned to an incubator for 1 and 24 hours
at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in a humidified
environment. Non-irradiated cells were handled similar to
the UVC irradiated samples, only without being exposed
to UVC lamp.
Cell viability and MTT assay
The cells were removed from the incubator twice (1
and 24 hours) post UVC irradiation. Next, the cells were
mixed with try-pan blue solution [0.3 % (v/v); 1:1], and
cell viability (%) was calculated for all conditions using
the following equation:Cell viability (%)=(viable cells)/(total cells)×100The cytotoxicity of Ag NPs in different concentration,
and UVC irradiation were investigated by a MTT cell
proliferation assay. MTT is reduced to purple formazan
crystals in functional mitochondria. The total formazan
produced is proportional to the number of viable cells. To
perform the MTT assay, TK6 cells at a density of 2.5×104
cells per well were cultured in 96-well culture plates.
Then the plate was incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 24
hours. The TK6 cells were then treated with different Ag
NPs concentration (0, 5, 10 and 15 µg/ml in each well),
and irradiated with a germicidal UVC lamp (λ254~ nm).
The plate was then returned to the incubator for 1 hour
(37°C, 5% CO2) after which the MTT solution (5 mg/
ml, Sigma Aldrich, M2128, USA) was added (20 µg in
each well) and cells were incubated for 4hrs at 37°C in
5% CO2. Following this, the plate was centrifuged (2500
rpm for 40 minutes) and the cell culture medium was
discarded. Then dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added
to dissolve the formazan crystals, and the plate was put on
a shaker for 30 minutes in a dark room. The absorbance of
each well was measured at 545 nm using an ELISA reader
(Fax Reader, England). Each experiment was repeated at
least three times independently and 0 µg/ml of Ag NPs
and UVC-was considered as the control group.
RNA isolation and quantitative real time polymerase
chain reaction
At the 1 hour and 24 hours after UVC irradiation time
points, total RNA from each sample was extracted using a
RNX-Plus solution (CinaClon Co., Iran) according to the
instruction provided by the manufacturer. A Nano drop
spectrometer (Helma, USA) was used to determine the quality
and concentration of the RNA samples. Approximately 1 µg
of total RNA was used for complementary DNA (cDNA)
synthesize using RevertAid First Strand cDNA synthesis kit
(Thermo Scientific, Lithuania), with a gradient thermal cycler
(ASTEC, Japan). cDNA samples were stored at -20°C. The
generated cDNA samples were mixed with a master mix
(SYBR Green Method with low ROX, Amplicon,) to prepare
the qRT-PCR reaction. The qRT-PCR Mixture consisted of 10
µl SYBR green PCR master mix, 0.5 µl forward primer, 0.5
µl reverse primer (10 µ.), and 8 µl nuclease free water. Then
1 µl of the cDNA samples were added to qRT-PCR master
mix. The specific primers and reaction conditions used in this
study are shown in Table 1. The 48-well plates containing all
reagents were briefly centrifuged and analyzed on an ABI
Step One Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems,
ABI, USA). ß-actin
was considered as the housekeeping gene
for analyses of this study.
Statistical analysis
All experiments were repeated in triplicates. Data are
expressed as the mean ± SD. Statistical comparison was
done using one-way ANOVA and P<0.05 was considered
to be statistically significant. In the cases where the
means were compared from the two independent groups,
independent t test was used and in the groups that were
dependent, paired t test was used.Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction primers, andreaction conditions for quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction(qRT-PCR)
Results
Cytotoxicity in combined treatment of TK6 cells with
Ag NPs and UVC irradiation
In this study the cytotoxic effect of simultaneous
exposure of TK6 cells to Ag and UVC irradiation was
examined using try-pan blue dye. In two separate time
points following UV irradiation (1 hour and 24 hours) cell
viability was reduced at all Ag NP concentrations, which
revealed a significant increase in cytotoxicity of Ag NPs
with UVC irradiation (Fig.1).TK6 cell viability after combined treatment with Ag NPs and
ultraviolet type C (UVC) irradiation using the try-pan blue assay; cells were
harvested 1 hour and 24 hours post UVC exposure (1 mW/cm2).A MTT colorimetric assay for TK6 cells in the presence
of Ag NPs and UVC irradiation was performed. MTT
results showed a dose dependent cytotoxicity of Ag NPs
with UVC irradiation. On the other hand, various Ag NPs
concentrations also showed a significant decrease in cell
viability. Also results show, cell viability was reduced by
increasing the concentration of the NPs alongside UVC
irradiation (Fig.2). These differences were significant in
comparison with when each factor was applied separately.
Therefore, the MTT test shows increased cytotoxic effects
of simultaneous exposure to Ag NPs and UVC irradiation.Cytotoxicity of co-exposure to different concentration of Ag NPs and
ultraviolet type C (UVC) irradiation (1 mW/cm2) by means of MTT assay. 0
µg/ml of Ag NPs and UVC-were considered as the control groups. Data are
presented as the mean ± SD.
Genotoxic effects of Ag NPs and UVC irradiation co-
treatment on TK6 cells
In this study, we investigated the genotoxic effects of
Ag NPs on TK6 cells post UVC irradiation with qRT-
PCR. In the present study, showed that treatment of TK6
cells with Ag NPs can significantly increase H2AX gene
expression in the absence of UVC irradiation after 1
hour and 24 hours post UVC irradiation (Fig.3A). This
trend was observed in all Ag NPs concentrations. Also
the results show that UVC irradiation alone can increase
H2AX gene expression in TK6 cells (Fig.3B). We observed
that H2AX expression was increased 1 hour and 24 hours
after UVC irradiation (P<0.01). The gene expression
in TK6 cells after co-treatment with Ag NPs and UVC
irradiation was compared with their control groups. H2AX
gene expression after being treated with 10 and 5 µg/ml
of Ag NPs post UV exposure was significantly increased,
both 1 hour and 24 hours after UVC treatment (Fig.4A,
B, P<0.05).The effect of Ag NPs and ultraviolet type C (UVC) irradiation on H2AX
gene expression on TK6 cells. H2AX gene expression 1 hour and 24 hours
after treatment with A. Ag NPs in different concentration (5, 10 and 15
µg/ml) and B. H2AX gene expression post UVC irradiation (1 mW/cm2) (**;
P<0.001). Data are presented as the mean ± SD. P<0.05 were considered
as significant.H2AX gene expression of Ag NPs and ultraviolet type C (UVC) co-
treated cells. TK6 cells were harvested A. 1 hour with 10 µg/ml Ag NPs,
and B. 24 hours with 5 µg/ml Ag NPs post exposure to UVC (1 mW/
cm2) (**; P<0.001). Data are presented as the mean ± SD. P<0.05 were
considered as significant.
Discussion
In recent years, increasing usage of Ag NPs has
led to the need for evaluating their cytotoxicity and
genotoxicity. Recently, the cytotoxic effects of Ag NPs
in various types of cells such as Hella cells (20), human
glioblastoma cells (U251) (21), BRL 3A rat liver cells
(22) have been evaluated. The sun’s UV radiation can
have many biological effects, including changes in the
structure of DNA, proteins and other biological molecules
(23, 24). For instance, Glover et al. (25) showed that after
irradiation TK6 cells with UVC, the sensitivity to DNA
damage was increased. It also increased the amount of
apoptosis, delayed DNA repair and caused changes in the
expression of P53-target genes.Xu et al. (20) showed that the viability of Hella cells
treated with Ag NPs (0-30 µg/ml Ag NPs) were decreased
after 24 and 48 hours. Similarly, an increase in cytotoxicity
was observed in cells treated with Ag NPs by Hussain et
al. in BRL 3A rat liver cells (22). In the present study,
cytotoxicity of Ag NPs combined treatment with UVC
irradiation in TK6 cells revealed that combined treatment
can reduce TK6 viability at two separate time points (1 hour
and 24 hours) post UVC irradiation. Furthermore, MTT
colorimetric assay showed a time dependent reduction of
cell viability of TK6 cells. A decrease in survival rate was
observed at all NP concentrations, which was in line with
previous studies (10, 20, 22, 26).There are several studies that have evaluated the effects
of UVA and UVB. For example, the genotoxicity of
Ag ions and UVB combined treatment was investigated
by Zhao et al. (2). They showed that UVB and Ag ions
simultaneous exposure in a human keratinocyte cell line,
HaCaT, can induce DNA breaks by measuring an increase
in H2AX. Induction of marked toxic effects against bacteria
through combined treatment using Ag NPs and UVA was
also investigated by Zhao et al. (27). .-H2AX expression
was measured 1 hour and 24 hours post ionizing radiation
by Li et al. (28) and they observed that expression of
H2AX significantly increased 1 hour post irradiation. Also
Zhang et al. (29) showed that after whole body irradiation
of mice, H2AX mRNA expression increased significantly
in comparison with control groups. Recently .-H2AX foci,
gene expression, miRNA and protein profile were used as
biomarkers for radiation (30-34). H2AX gene expression
is proportional to the early cellular response to DSBs (18),
which can be induced by UV irradiation (35). Therefore,
due to the release of silver ions from Ag NPs that leads
to H2AX gene expression; the present study aimed to
investigate the potential genotoxicity of Ag NPs along
with UV exposure by measuring H2AX gene expression
using qRT-PCR.Without applying UVC radiation H2AX gene expression
increased with the increase in nanoparticle concentration.
Results show that UVC alone can induce a significant
enhancement in H2AX gene expression. When the cells
were co-exposed to Ag NPs and UVC, a significant
increase in relative gene expression in comparison with its
control group was observed 1 hour after irradiation with
10 µg/ml Ag NPs. As post treatment time increased from
1 hour to 24 hours, we found that there was a significanct
increase in H2AX gene expression (in 5 µg/ml Ag NPs)
in comparison to its control group. In a study by Glover
et al. (25) the effects of DNA damage response in TK6
cells treated with 12-O-Tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate
(TPA)+UVC was evaluated using γ-H2AX formation in
various times, after UVC irradiation (0-24 hours). Results
showed that cell treatment with TPA and UVC caused
a significant increase in γ-H2AX, 2 hours after UVC
exposure. In our study, we observed H2AX synergistic
gene expression in 24 hours post UVC treatment in cells
treated with 5 µg/ml Ag NPs.Uddin et al. (36) evaluated the effect of low
concentrations of arsenite and showed that it can increase
the risk of skin cancer after UV irradiation. Hence, to
investigate the effects of Ag NPs in low concentrations
we chose 5 and 10 µg/ml of NPs, and it was observed that
in these two concentrations, at 1 hour and 24 hours after
UVC irradiation H2AX gene expression was increased.
Based on these results, co-treatment of TK6 cells with Ag
NPs and UVC irradiation can have a synergic effect and
significantly increase H2AX gene expression. Therefore,
the use of Ag NPs and UVC irradiation can be effective
in death of cancer cells. This means that Ag NPs can be
used as a sensitizing agent for UVC irradiation to combat
cancer cells.
Conclusion
Try-pan blue and MTT tests revealed that simultaneous
use of silver nanoparticles and UVC irradiation can lead
to increased cytotoxicity. We have found that exposing
human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells to UVC after treatment
with increasing concentrations of Ag NPs can induce dose
dependent cellular toxicity. In addition, evaluating the in
vitro genotoxicity of Ag NPs at different concentrations
alongside UVC exposure revealed that UVC irradiation
can enhance the genotoxic effects Ag NPs as revealed
by increased H2AX gene expression. The results of this
study show a significant synergistic increase in H2AX
gene expression could occur in TK6 cells co-exposed to
Ag NPs and UVC irradiation. Consequently, combination
of Ag NPs and UVC irradiation could be used in cancer
therapy.
Table 1
Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction primers, andreaction conditions for quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction(qRT-PCR)
Authors: Adalto Bianchini; Karl C Bowles; Colin J Brauner; Joseph W Gorsuch; James R Kramer; Chris M Wood Journal: Environ Toxicol Chem Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 3.742
Authors: Alexis B Lyons; Shanthi Narla; Angeli E Torres; Angela Parks-Miller; Indermeet Kohli; David M Ozog; Henry W Lim; Iltefat H Hamzavi Journal: Int J Dermatol Date: 2020-12-01 Impact factor: 3.204