| Literature DB >> 30825286 |
Fatemeh Barzegari Firouzabadi1,2, S Hahrbanoo Oryan3, Mohammad Hasan Sheikhha4, Seyed Mehdi Kalantar5, Ameneh Javed6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Today, in clinical trials, we suffer from the lack of effective methods with minimal side effects to deliver medication. Thus, efforts to identify better conditions for delivery of biomedical drugs seem necessary. The purpose of this study was to design a new liposomal formula for transportation of microRNA in osteosarcoma.Entities:
Keywords: Cell Survival; Liposome; Osteosarcoma; microRNA
Year: 2019 PMID: 30825286 PMCID: PMC6397608 DOI: 10.22074/cellj.2019.6008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell J ISSN: 2228-5806 Impact factor: 2.479
Fig.2Investigation of cell survival after liposomal treatment and optimization of microRNA loaded into nano-liposomes. A. Comparison of the toxicity impact of various empty liposome formulations after 48 and 72 hours in hum-63 cells and B. Optimization of loading microRNA into nano-liposomes with agarose gel electrophoresis to determine the maximum effective concentration of liposome (μg)/microRNA (μg). *; P<0.05.
Fig.3Analysis of the stability test of free microRNA as well as microRNA loaded into lipoplex vesicles and stability of the nano-lipoplex containing microRNA in plasma. A. (Right to left): row 1; free microRNA, row 2; lipoplex -immediately after formation, row 3; lipoplex -after one week, row 4; lipoplex -after two weeks, row 5; lipoplex -after four weeks, row 6; lipoplex -after six weeks, row 7; lipoplex -after eight weeks, row 8; lipoplex -after 10 weeks, row 9; lipoplex -after three months, row 10; lipoplex -after three and half months, row 11; lipoplex -after four months, row 12; Ladder. w; Week. m; Month and B. Nano- lipoplex vesicles were mixed with mouse plasma for one, two and four hours. After this period the SaOs-2 cells were treated with the prepared liposome suspension for one hour at 37°C. miR-143 was labeled with CY-5 (red) and nucleus was counterstained with DAPI (blue); their merge created a turquoise blue color. a; Liposomal miR-143 accumulation in the cytoplasm and b; Nuclei stained with DAPI prior to analysis (magnification: ×60).
Characterization of liposomal formulations
| Code | DPPC (g) | Chol (g) | DOTAP (g) | PEG (g) | Zeta potential (mv) | Size (nm) | PDI | Total volume (ml) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | 0.0102 | 0.0023 | 0 | 0 | -24.33 ± 0.83 | 148.4 ± 2.4 | 0.297 ± 0.01 | 1 |
| F2 | 0 | 0.0038 | 0.0071 | 0 | +38.23 ± 0.33 | 125.22 ± 2.3 | 0.230 ± 0.024 | 1 |
| F3 | 0.0061 | 0.0013 | 0.0061 | 0 | +34.21 ± 0.23 | 130 ± 1.3 | 0.202 ± 0.02 | 1 |
| F4 | 0.0071 | 0.0016 | 0.0046 | 0 | +21.87 ± 1.43 | 114.67 ± 1.60 | 0.128 ± 0.01 | 1 |
| F5 | 0.0066 | 0.0015 | 0.0046 | 0.0028 | +29.32 ± 1.02 | 119.52 ± 0.8 | 0.107 ± 0.01 | 1 |
| F6 | 0.0068 | 0.0015 | 0.0046 | 0.0016 | +27.24 ± 0.21 | 105.23 ± 0.36 | 0.109 ± 0.03 | 1 |
| F6 with microRNA | 0.0068 | 0.0015 | 0.0046 | 0.0016 | +13.61 ± 0.33 | 137.45 ± 0.51 | 0.110 ± 0.02 | 1 |
DPPC; 1,2- Dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3 phosphocholine, DOTAP; 1,2-dioleoyl-3-trimethylammonium-propane, PEG; DistearoylPhosphoethanolamine (PE 18:0/ 18:0-PEG2000, DSPE-mPEG 2000), and PDI; Dispersion index.