Literature DB >> 3082297

Nasogastric compared with nasoduodenal feeding in low birthweight infants.

I A Laing, M A Lang, O Callaghan, R Hume.   

Abstract

One hundred successive infants weighing less than 1500 g at birth were allocated alternately to intermittent nasogastric or continuous nasoduodenal feeding regimens. Eighty were appropriate for gestational age, and of these 25 fed successfully by nasogastric tube and 16 tolerated nasoduodenal feeding until 1600 g. No significant differences in either calorie intake or growth rates were identified throughout the seven weeks of the study. Because of the increased complexity and radiological exposure involved with feeding transpylorically, nasogastric feeding may be preferred as a method of feeding the low birthweight infant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3082297      PMCID: PMC1777578          DOI: 10.1136/adc.61.2.138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  9 in total

1.  Intestinal perforations secondary to nasojejunal feeding tubes.

Authors:  R L Siegle; J G Rabinowitz; C Sarasohn
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  The effect of severe early malnutrition on cellular growth of human brain.

Authors:  M Winick; P Rosso
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 3.756

3.  Impaired assimilation of nasojejunal feeds in healthy low-birth-weight newborn infants.

Authors:  R N Roy; R B Pollnitz; J R Hamilton; G W Chance
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 4.406

4.  Duodenal perforation: a complication of neonatal nasojejunal feeding.

Authors:  S J Boros; J W Reynolds
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  Parenteral nutrition compared with transpyloric feeding.

Authors:  E J Glass; R Hume; M A Lang; J O Forfar
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Intravenous alimentation in pediatric patients.

Authors:  W C Heird; J M Driscoll; J N Schullinger; B Grebin; R W Winters
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 4.406

7.  Nasoduodenal versus nasogastric feeding in the very low birthweight infant.

Authors:  M V Caillie; G K Powell
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Poor weight gain of the low birthweight infant fed nasojejunally.

Authors:  M F Whitfield
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  Controlled study of transpyloric and intermittent gavage feeding in the small preterm infant.

Authors:  G R Pereira; J A Lemons
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 7.124

  9 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of transpyloric versus gastric tube feeding for preterm infants.

Authors:  W McGuire; P McEwan
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Randomised trial of continuous nasogastric, bolus nasogastric, and transpyloric feeding in infants of birth weight under 1400 g.

Authors:  P D Macdonald; C H Skeoch; H Carse; F Dryburgh; L G Alroomi; P Galea; G Gettinby
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 3.  Transpyloric versus gastric tube feeding for preterm infants.

Authors:  Julie Watson; William McGuire
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-02-28

Review 4.  Scientifically-based strategies for nutrition of the high-risk low birth weight infant.

Authors:  J Neu; C Valentine; W Meetze
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.183

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.