Joshua R Smith1, Barry A Borlaug2, Thomas P Olson2. 1. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minnesota. Electronic address: smith.joshua1@mayo.edu. 2. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minnesota.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) exhibit pulmonary abnormalities, but the studies to date have reported wide variability in the ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide (V̇E/V̇CO2) slope. It is possible that aging may contribute to that variability. We sought to compare ventilatory efficiency and its components in older and younger HFpEF patients during exercise. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighteen older (O; 80 ± 4 y) and 19 younger (Y; 59 ± 7 y) HFpEF patients performed cardiopulmonary exercise testing to volitional fatigue. Measurements of arterial blood gases were used to derive VD/VT, dead space ventilation, and alveolar ventilation. V̇E/V̇CO2 slope was greater in older compared with younger HFpEF patients (O 36 ± 7vs Y 31 ± 7; P = .04). At peak exercise, older HFpEF exhibited greater VD/VT compared with younger HFpEF (O 0.37 ± 0.10vs Y 0.28 ± 0.10; P < .01), whereas PaCO2 was not different between groups (P = .58). V̇E and alveolar ventilation were similar (P > .23), but dead space ventilation was greater in older compared with younger HFpEF at peak exercise (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Older HFpEF patients exhibit greater ventilatory inefficiency resulting from elevated physiologic dead space during peak exercise compared with younger HFpEF patients. These results suggest that aging can worsen the pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying ventilatory efficiency during exercise in HFpEF.
BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) exhibit pulmonary abnormalities, but the studies to date have reported wide variability in the ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide (V̇E/V̇CO2) slope. It is possible that aging may contribute to that variability. We sought to compare ventilatory efficiency and its components in older and younger HFpEF patients during exercise. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighteen older (O; 80 ± 4 y) and 19 younger (Y; 59 ± 7 y) HFpEF patients performed cardiopulmonary exercise testing to volitional fatigue. Measurements of arterial blood gases were used to derive VD/VT, dead space ventilation, and alveolar ventilation. V̇E/V̇CO2 slope was greater in older compared with younger HFpEF patients (O 36 ± 7vs Y 31 ± 7; P = .04). At peak exercise, older HFpEF exhibited greater VD/VT compared with younger HFpEF (O 0.37 ± 0.10vs Y 0.28 ± 0.10; P < .01), whereas PaCO2 was not different between groups (P = .58). V̇E and alveolar ventilation were similar (P > .23), but dead space ventilation was greater in older compared with younger HFpEF at peak exercise (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Older HFpEF patients exhibit greater ventilatory inefficiency resulting from elevated physiologic dead space during peak exercise compared with younger HFpEF patients. These results suggest that aging can worsen the pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying ventilatory efficiency during exercise in HFpEF.