Literature DB >> 30821878

Partial volume mapping using magnetic resonance fingerprinting.

Anagha Deshmane1, Debra F McGivney2, Dan Ma2, Yun Jiang2, Chaitra Badve2,3, Vikas Gulani2,3,4, Nicole Seiberlich2,4, Mark A Griswold2,4.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) is a quantitative imaging technique that maps multiple tissue properties through pseudorandom signal excitation and dictionary-based reconstruction. The aim of this study is to estimate and validate partial volumes from MRF signal evolutions (PV-MRF), and to characterize possible sources of error. Partial volume model inversion (pseudoinverse) and dictionary-matching approaches to calculate brain tissue fractions (cerebrospinal fluid, gray matter, white matter) were compared in a numerical phantom and seven healthy subjects scanned at 3 T. Results were validated by comparison with ground truth in simulations and ROI analysis in vivo. Simulations investigated tissue fraction errors arising from noise, undersampling artifacts, and model errors. An expanded partial volume model was investigated in a brain tumor patient. PV-MRF with dictionary matching is robust to noise, and estimated tissue fractions are sensitive to model errors. A 6% error in pure tissue T1 resulted in average absolute tissue fraction error of 4% or less. A partial volume model within these accuracy limits could be semi-automatically constructed in vivo using k-means clustering of MRF-mapped relaxation times. Dictionary-based PV-MRF robustly identifies pure white matter, gray matter and cerebrospinal fluid, and partial volumes in subcortical structures. PV-MRF could also estimate partial volumes of solid tumor and peritumoral edema. We conclude that PV-MRF can attribute subtle changes in relaxation times to altered tissue composition, allowing for quantification of specific tissues which occupy a fraction of a voxel.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  quantitative MRI; tissue fractions; tissue mapping

Year:  2019        PMID: 30821878     DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  6 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance fingerprinting: an overview.

Authors:  Charit Tippareddy; Walter Zhao; Jeffrey L Sunshine; Mark Griswold; Dan Ma; Chaitra Badve
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Magnetic resonance fingerprinting of the pancreas at 1.5 T and 3.0 T.

Authors:  Eva M Serrao; Dimitri A Kessler; Bruno Carmo; Lucian Beer; Kevin M Brindle; Guido Buonincontri; Ferdia A Gallagher; Fiona J Gilbert; Edmund Godfrey; Martin J Graves; Mary A McLean; Evis Sala; Rolf F Schulte; Joshua D Kaggie
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance fingerprinting review part 2: Technique and directions.

Authors:  Debra F McGivney; Rasim Boyacıoğlu; Yun Jiang; Megan E Poorman; Nicole Seiberlich; Vikas Gulani; Kathryn E Keenan; Mark A Griswold; Dan Ma
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 4.  MR fingerprinting of the prostate.

Authors:  Wei-Ching Lo; Ananya Panda; Yun Jiang; James Ahad; Vikas Gulani; Nicole Seiberlich
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 2.533

5.  Fast multi-component analysis using a joint sparsity constraint for MR fingerprinting.

Authors:  Martijn Nagtegaal; Peter Koken; Thomas Amthor; Mariya Doneva
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  MR Fingerprinting with b-Tensor Encoding for Simultaneous Quantification of Relaxation and Diffusion in a Single Scan.

Authors:  Maryam Afzali; Lars Mueller; Ken Sakaie; Siyuan Hu; Yong Chen; Filip Szczepankiewicz; Mark A Griswold; Derek K Jones; Dan Ma
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.737

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.