| Literature DB >> 30821223 |
Zhixin Yu1, Min Deng1, Chunting Peng1, Xue Song1, Yi Chen1, Xue Zhang1, Qiuxia Liu1, Yuchuan Li1, Haiyin Jiang1, Xiaolan Xu1, Liya Pan1, Jing Yuan2, Bing Ruan1.
Abstract
Hepatitis B constitutes a severe public health challenge in China. The Community-based Collaborative Innovation hepatitis B (CCI-HBV) project is a national epidemiological study of hepatitis B and has been conducting a comprehensive intervention in southern Zhejiang since 2009.The comprehensive intervention in CCI-HBV areas includes the dynamic hepatitis B screening in local residents, the normalised treatment for hepatitis B infections and the upcoming full-aged hepatitis B vaccination. After two rounds of screening (each round taking for 4 years), the initial epidemiological baseline of hepatitis B in Qinggang was obtained, a coastal community in east China. By combining key data and system dynamics modelling, the regional hepatitis B epidemic in 20 years was predicted.There were 1041 HBsAg positive cases out of 12 228 people in Round 1 indicating HBV prevalence of 8.5%. Of the 13 146 people tested in Round 2, 1171 people were HBsAg positive, with a prevalence of 8.9%. By comparing the two rounds of screening, the HBV incidence rate of 0.192 per 100 person-years was observed. By consulting electronic medical records, the HBV onset rate of 0.533 per 100 person-years was obtained. We generated a simulated model to replicate the real-world situation for the next two decades. To evaluate the effect of interventions on regional HBV prevalence, three comparative experiments were conducted.In this study, the regional hepatitis B epidemic in 20 years was predicted and compared with HBV prevalence under different interventions. Owing to the existing challenges in research methodology, this study combined HBV field research and simulation to provide a system dynamics model with close-to-real key data to improve prediction accuracy. The simulation also provided a prompt guidance for the field implementation.Entities:
Keywords: Cohort study; hepatitis B; system dynamics modelling
Year: 2019 PMID: 30821223 PMCID: PMC6518579 DOI: 10.1017/S0950268819000220
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Epidemiol Infect ISSN: 0950-2688 Impact factor: 2.451
Fig. 1.The flowchart of CCI HBV field research.
Fig. 2.The overview of model structure, showing the population stocks and flows, including three parameters of community interventions.
HBV prevalence in different genders and age groups in two rounds of screening
| Groups | Sample size | No. of HBsAg positive | HBsAg positive rate(%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | Round 2 | Round 1 | Round 2 | Round 1 | 95% CI | Round 2 | 95% CI | |
| Males | 5398 | 6050 | 567 | 661 | 10.5 | 9.7–11.3 | 10.9 | 10.1–11.7 |
| Females | 6830 | 7096 | 474 | 510 | 6.9 | 6.3–7.5 | 7.2 | 6.6–7.8 |
| 0–24 | 2 | 159 | 1 | 9 | – | – | 5.7 | 2.0–9.3 |
| 25–29 | 13 | 275 | 3 | 37 | – | – | 13.5 | 9.4–17.5 |
| 30–34 | 87 | 444 | 18 | 65 | 20.7 | 1.2–29.4 | 14.6 | 11.3–17.9 |
| 35–39 | 145 | 663 | 14 | 84 | 9.7 | 4.8–14.5 | 12.7 | 10.1–15.2 |
| 40–44 | 419 | 828 | 54 | 110 | 12.9 | 9.7–16.1 | 13.3 | 11.0–15.6 |
| 45–49 | 1197 | 968 | 148 | 130 | 12.4 | 10.5–14.2 | 13.4 | 11.3–15.6 |
| 50–54 | 1466 | 1161 | 155 | 150 | 10.6 | 9.0–12.1 | 12.9 | 11.0–14.9 |
| 55–59 | 1475 | 1093 | 155 | 116 | 10.5 | 8.9–12.1 | 10.6 | 8.8–12.4 |
| 60–64 | 1842 | 1456 | 154 | 153 | 8.4 | 7.1–9.6 | 10.5 | 8.9–12.1 |
| 65–69 | 1637 | 1871 | 119 | 119 | 7.3 | 6.0–8.5 | 6.4 | 5.3–7.5 |
| 70–74 | 1119 | 1242 | 83 | 79 | 7.4 | 5.9–9.0 | 6.4 | 5.0–7.7 |
| 75–79 | 980 | 991 | 53 | 45 | 5.4 | 4.0–6.8 | 4.5 | 3.2–5.8 |
| >80 | 1846 | 1995 | 84 | 74 | 4.6 | 3.6–5.5 | 3.7 | 2.9–4.5 |
| All | 12 228 | 13 146 | 1041 | 1171 | 8.5 | 8.0–9.0 | 8.9 | 8.4–9.4 |
HBV prevalence in different genders and age groups in fixed cohort
| Groups | Group size | Round 1 | Round 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of HBsAg positive | HBsAg positive rate(%) | 95% CI(%) | No. of HBsAg positive | HBsAg positive rate(%) | 95% CI(%) | ||
| 25–29 | 11 | 3 | 27.3 | −4.1–58.7 | 3 | 27.3 | −4.1–58.7 |
| 30–34 | 70 | 15 | 21.4 | 11.6–31.3 | 16 | 22.9 | 12.8–32.9 |
| 35–39 | 107 | 8 | 7.5 | 2.4–12.5 | 7 | 6.5 | 1.8–11.3 |
| 40–44 | 254 | 37 | 14.6 | 10.2–18.9 | 36 | 14.2 | 9.9–18.5 |
| 45–49 | 545 | 56 | 10.3 | 7.7–12.8 | 67 | 12.3 | 9.5–15.1 |
| 50–54 | 683 | 61 | 8.9 | 6.8–11.1 | 79 | 11.6 | 9.2–14.0 |
| 55–59 | 663 | 57 | 8.6 | 6.5–10.7 | 76 | 11.5 | 9.0–13.9 |
| 60–64 | 887 | 71 | 8.0 | 6.2–9.8 | 86 | 9.7 | 7.7–11.6 |
| 65–69 | 949 | 57 | 6.0 | 4.5–7.5 | 57 | 6.0 | 4.5–7.5 |
| 70–74 | 643 | 44 | 6.8 | 4.9–8.8 | 39 | 6.1 | 4.5–7.9 |
| 75–79 | 518 | 24 | 4.6 | 2.8–6.4 | 19 | 3.7 | 2.0–5.3 |
| >80 | 1047 | 37 | 3.5 | 2.4–4.7 | 34 | 3.2 | 2.2–4.3 |
| All | 6377 | 470 | 7.4 | 6.7–8.0 | 519 | 8.1 | 7.5–8.8 |
Fig. 3.The 20-year HBV epidemic forecast in Qinggang, including diagnosed HBV carriers/patients/complications as well as immunised group.
Fig. 4.Comparison of epidemic forecast under different immunisation rates.
Fig. 5.Comparison of epidemic forecast under different detection rates.
Fig. 6.Comparison of epidemic forecast under different treatment rates.