Literature DB >> 30820993

The Emergency Department Response to Women Experiencing Intimate Partner Violence: Insights From Interviews With Clinicians in Australia.

Angela J Dawson1, Chris Rossiter2, Anna Doab1, Bernadine Romero3, Lesley Fitzpatrick4, Margaret Fry5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Emergency departments (EDs) are essential providers of compassionate, immediate treatment and referral for women experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV). IPV, largely perpetrated by men against women, exerts a substantial burden on the health systems and economies of all nations. There is little known about how staff in Australian EDs respond to the challenges such violence generates. We therefore examined the clinical team response to women experiencing IPV in two large Australian metropolitan hospital EDs.
METHODS: We undertook qualitative semistructured interviews and focus group discussions with 35 social workers, nurses, and doctors. Transcripts were recorded and transcribed verbatim. We analyzed the data thematically. We first undertook line-by-line coding and organized content into descriptive categories. Latent and manifest patterns were identified across the data and mapped to key themes in negotiation with all authors.
RESULTS: Respondents emphasized challenges identifying IPV resulting from professional uncertainty or discomfort and women's fear of the ramifications of disclosure. Emergency clinicians routinely referred women to social workers after medical treatment and described effective collaboration across professions. Social workers outlined difficulties coordinating care with health and community agencies. Staff highlighted challenges maintaining nonjudgmental attitudes and managing their own feelings-especially clinicians who had personally experienced violence.
CONCLUSIONS: Emergency departments can provide caring environments for women experiencing IPV. Effective interprofessional teamwork across nursing, medical, and social work professionals may mitigate the need for formal screening tools. Supportive workforce environments can improve staff understanding, reduce stigma, enhance appropriate treatment, and counsel health professionals experiencing violence. However, staff training and advocacy and referral relationships with local programs require strengthening. A connected multisystems-level response is required to coordinate and resource services for all affected by violence.
© 2019 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30820993     DOI: 10.1111/acem.13721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  5 in total

1.  Knowledge of gynecologists in the public health system care of women victims of violence.

Authors:  Débora Davalos Albuquerque Maranhão; Gabriela Guimarães Franco Ramos; Giulia Siqueira Galfano; Eduardo Juan Troster
Journal:  Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 1.712

2.  Responding to family violence: Variations in knowledge, confidence and skills across clinical professions in a large tertiary public hospital.

Authors:  Toni D Withiel; Helen Gill; Caroline A Fisher
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2021-03-10

3.  Measuring Nurses' and Physicians' Attitudes and Perceptions of the Appropriate Interventions towards Intimate Partner Violence in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Wafa Hamad Almegewly; Sanna Hawamdah; Fatchima Laouali Moussa; Wireen Leila Tanggawohn Dator; Anwar Alonezi; Majid Al-Eissa
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-30

4.  Identifying domestic violence and sexual assault presentations at a regional Australian hospital emergency department: Comparative analysis of domestic violence and sexual assault cases.

Authors:  Nafiseh Ghafournia; Sunita Joann Rebecca Healey
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

5.  Sexist Myths Emergency Healthcare Professionals and Factors Associated with the Detection of Intimate Partner Violence in Women.

Authors:  Encarnación Martínez-García; Verónica Montiel-Mesa; Belén Esteban-Vilchez; Beatriz Bracero-Alemany; Adelina Martín-Salvador; María Gázquez-López; María Ángeles Pérez-Morente; María Adelaida Alvarez-Serrano
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-23       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.