Literature DB >> 30820962

Evaluation with micro-CT of different anticoagulation strategies during hemodialysis in patients with thrombocytopenia: A randomized crossover study.

Floris Vanommeslaeghe1, Filip De Somer2, Iván Josipovic3, Matthieu Boone3, Annemieke Dhondt1, Wim Van Biesen1, Sunny Eloot1.   

Abstract

In patients with enhanced risk for bleeding, heparin-free hemodialysis (HD) with conventional dialyzers is routinely used. To explore the potential benefit of using heparin-coated dialyzers, we used a reference CT-scanning technique and registered different clotting parameters to quantify coagulation with heparin-coated versus non-coated dialyzers. Six HD patients with thrombocytopenia were dialyzed 240 min in a randomized crossover study with Evodial 1.3 or FX600 Cordiax, each without anticoagulation. Blood samples were taken from the vascular access predialysis, and from the dialyzer inlet and outlet at 5 and 240 min after dialysis start. Predialysis blood samples were analyzed for hemoglobin, hematocrit, thrombocytes, fibrinogen, and activated partial thromboplastin time. On dialyzer inlet and outlet blood samples, a viscoelastic measurement of blood coagulation was performed using a Sonoclot analyzer. After dialysis, dialyzers were visually scored, subsequently dried for 24 h, weighed, and scanned with micro-CT at a resolution of 25 µm. After image reconstruction, the open, non-coagulated fibers were counted in a representative cross-section at the dialyzer outlet. No sessions were terminated prematurely for circuit clotting. Heparin-coated dialyzers had more patent fibers on micro-CT versus non-coated dialyzers and also had a better score of subjective visual assessment of fiber clotting. There was no difference in subjective assessment of clotting at the venous drip chamber. With both dialyzers, all ACT values remained in the normal range, and were lower at the dialyzer outlet versus inlet. In conclusion, dialysis with a heparin-coated versus non heparin-coated membrane results in substantially less coagulated fibers during 4 h hemodialysis without systemic anticoagulation. Eventual leaching of heparin, immobilized on the fiber membrane, does not result in measurable systemic anticoagulation.
© 2019 International Center for Artificial Organs and Transplantation and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anticoagulation; bleeding disorder; fiber blocking; fiber patency; hemodialysis; heparin-coated

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30820962     DOI: 10.1111/aor.13452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Organs        ISSN: 0160-564X            Impact factor:   3.094


  4 in total

1.  A randomized cross-over study with objective quantification of the performance of an asymmetric triacetate and a polysulfone dialysis membrane using different anticoagulation strategies.

Authors:  Floris Vanommeslaeghe; Iván Josipovic; Matthieu Boone; Annemie Dhondt; Wim Van Biesen; Sunny Eloot
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2019-12-22

2.  How biocompatible haemodialysers can conquer the need for systemic anticoagulation even in post-dilution haemodiafiltration: a cross-over study.

Authors:  Floris Vanommeslaeghe; Iván Josipovic; Matthieu Boone; Arjan van der Tol; Annemie Dhondt; Wim Van Biesen; Sunny Eloot
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2020-12-08

Review 3.  Biocompatibility of Surface-Modified Membranes for Chronic Hemodialysis Therapy.

Authors:  Mario Bonomini; Luca Piscitani; Lorenzo Di Liberato; Vittorio Sirolli
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-04-03

4.  Evaluation of Different Dialyzers and the Impact of Predialysis Albumin Priming in Intermittent Hemodialysis With Reduced Anticoagulation.

Authors:  Floris Vanommeslaeghe; Filip De Somer; Iván Josipovic; Matthieu Boone; Wim Van Biesen; Sunny Eloot
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2019-07-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.