Two New Eudesmane Sesquiterpenoids from the Flowers of Chrysanthemum indicum.

The flowers of Chrysanthemum indicum, i.e. Ye-ju-hua recorded in the Chinese Pharmacopoeia, has been widely used in China as an important heat-clearing and detoxifying herb for the treatment of inflammation, headache, and vertigo. A phytochemical investigation of this herb has led to the isolation of two new eudesmane sesquiterpenoids, 7-epi-eudesm-4(15),11(13)-diene-1β,3β-diol (1) and 7-epi-1β-hydroxy-β-eudesmol (2). The molecular structures of these new sesquiterpenoids were established based on the comprehensive spectroscopic analyses, including NMR, MS, and IR, and comparing with the literatures.

Introduction

The plants of Asteraceae family, which contains 25 000–30 000 species belonging to over 1000 genera, have been considered as rich sources of eudesmane sesquiterpenoids [1]. Till now there have been over 1000 naturally occurring eudesmane sesquiterpenoids identified from the Asteraceae family, and these plant metabolites possessed diverse oxygenation and cleavage patterns [2]. Eudesmane-type sesquiterpenoids exhibit a wide range of biological activities, such as plant growth regulating, insect antifeedant, antifungal, anti-tumour, antibacterial, and antiviral activities [3-11]. Due to these, eudesmane-type sesquiterpenoids have long been the research focus of the phytochemists and pharmacologists.

The flowers of Chrysanthemum indicum has long been used a traditional heat-clearing and detoxifying herb in China. It is called Ye-ju-hua in the Chinese Pharmacopoeia [12]. The main usage of this traditional Chinese medicine was to treat inflammation, headache, and vertigo and for the preparation of a bitter tea used for antibacterial, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory purposes [13]. It has long been our goal to find more novel sesquiterpenoids from traditional Chinese herbs [14-18]. As part of this program, an investigation of an aqueous EtOH extract of the flowers of C. indicum afforded 2 further new sesquiterpenoids (Fig. 1), 7-epi-eudesm-4(15),11(13)-diene-1β,3β-diol (1) and 7-epi-1β-hydroxy-β-eudesmol (2). In this paper we will report the procedures for the isolation and structure determination of the two new isolates.

Fig. 1

Molecular structures of sesquiterpenoids 1 and 2

Results and Discussion

Sesquiterpenoid 1 was isolated as a white solid with a optical rotation value of  + 5.0 (c 0.2, acetone), which suggested this compound could be a racemate. It was assigned a molecular formula of C15H24O2 as determined based on an ion peak at m/z 219.1750 [M – H2O + H]+ (calcd for C15H23O, 219.1743) in its positive HRESIMS, which suggested four degrees of unsaturation. The IR absorptions at 3384 and 1654 cm−1 suggested the presence of hydroxy and olefinic functionalities, respectively. The 1H and 13C NMR data of 1 revealed (Table 1) an angular methyl (δH 0.74, δC 9.9), a vinyl methyl (δH 1.70, δC 22.2), two oxymethines (δH 3.44, δC 77.1; δH 4.06, δC 70.4), and two terminal double bonds (δH 4.73, 5.11, δC 103.4, 151.6; δH 4.79, 4.91, δC 110.9, 146.4). These observations suggested that 1 possessed a eudesmane framework with two hydroxy groups and two terminal double bonds [14-18]. From the HMBC experiment (Fig. 2), the angular methyl (H3-14) correlated with C-1, C-5, C-9 and C-10 (δC 77.1, 38.9, 32.3 and 40.5 respectively), indicating that one hydroxyl group was linked at C-1. Similarly, the exomethylene protons (H2-15) correlated with C-3 and C-5 (δC 70.4 and 38.9), which clearly indicated that another hydroxyl group was located at C-3. In the NOE difference experiment, irradiation of H-1 (δH 3.44) enhanced the resonances of H-3 (0.81%), H-2α (1.47%), and H-5 (1.15%), but not H3-14, indicating that H-1, H-3 and H-5 were all α-oriented (assuming that H3-14 was β-oriented). Comparison of the carbon signal at C-7 (δC 38.4) with that of ligucyperonol (δC 45.1) [19] and β-dictyopterol (δC 45.3) [20], suggested a β-orientation of H-7. Finally sesquiterpenoid 1 was elucidated as 7-epi-eudesm-4(15),11(13)-diene-1β,3β-diol.

Table 1

NMR Spectroscopic Data (in CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Sesquiterpenoids 1 and 2

No.	1		2
	1H (δ)	13C (δ)	1H (δ)	13C (δ)
1	3.44 dd (12.0, 4.4)	77.1 (d)	3.45 dd (11.6, 4.4)	79.3 (d)
2	2.23 m, 1.51 m	40.8 (t)	1.82 m, 1.51 m	31.4 (t)
3	4.06 dd (12.0, 5.2)	70.4 (d)	2.32 m, 2.17 m	34.3 (t)
4		151.6 (s)		149.3 (s)
5	1.73 m	38.9 (d)	2.17 m	41.8 (d)
6	1.85 m, 1.67 m	25.1 (t)	1.73 m, 1.63 m	23.5 (t)
7	2.45 brs	38.4 (d)	1.68 m	41.6 (d)
8	1.88 m, 1.67 m	22.9 (t)	1.78 m, 1.63 m	20.8 (t)
9	1.63 m, 1.37 m	32.3 (t)	1.62 m	34.0 (t)
10		40.5 (s)		39.6 (s)
11		146.4 (s)		74.4 (s)
12	1.70 s	22.2 (q)	1.27 s	29.6 (q)
13	4.91 d (1.6)4.79 s	110.9 (t)	1.26 s	29.2 (q)
14	0.74 s	9.9 (q)	0.73 s	11.1 (q)
15	5.11 s,4.73 d (1.6)	103.4 (t)	4.78 d (1.2),4.54 s	106.8 (t)

Fig. 2

Key COSY (H → H), HMBC (H → C) correlations of 1 and 2

Sesquiterpenoid 2 was obtained as a white solid with  + 3.0 (c 0.35, acetone), which indicated it maybe exist as a racemate. Its molecular formula was assigned as C15H26O2 on the basis of an ion at m/z 261.1815 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C15H26O2Na, 261.1825) in the positive HRESIMS. Its IR absorptions at 3323 and 1645 cm−1 indicated the occurrence of hydroxy and olefinic functionalities, respectively. The 1H and 13C NMR data of 2 demonstrated three methyls (δH 1.11, 1.22, 1.32; δC 11.1, 29.2, 29.6), one oxymethine (δH 3.45; δC 79.3), one oxygenated tertiary carbon (δC 74.4), and one terminal double bond (δH 4.54, 4.78; δC 106.8, 149.3). These observations indicated 2 as an eudesmane sesquiterpenoid possessing two hydroxy groups and one terminal double bond [14-18]. Furthermore, its planer structure was constructed via HMBC experiment as shown in Fig. 2. From the NOE difference experiment, irradiation of H-1 (δH 3.45) enhanced the signals of H-3α (1.47%) and H-5 (1.11%) indicating that H-1 and H-5 was α-oriented. The chemical shifts of C-1/2/10 of compound 8 (δC 79.3/31.4/39.6 in CDCl3), which were similar to those of β-dictyopterol (δC 79.3/31.5/40.2 in CDCl3) [20], were used to determine the β-oriented Me-14. The β-orientation of H-7 was deduced from dramatic differences in chemical shifts of C-5/7/9 in compound 8 (δC 41.8/41.6/34.0 in CDCl3) and 1β-hydroxy-β-eudesmol (δC 47.5/48.9/36.9 in CDCl3) [21]. Thus, sesquiterpenoid 2 was established as 7-epi-1β-hydroxy-β-eudesmol.

Experimental Section

General

Optical rotations were measured on a Perkin-Elmer model 341 polarimeter with a 1 dm cell. IR spectra were obtained on a Nicolet NEXUS 670 FT-IR spectrometer. NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AVANCE Ш-400 spectrometer. Chemical shifts are given as δ (ppm) using TMS as internal standard. HRESIMS were carried out on a Bruker APEX II mass spectrometer. Sephadex LH-20 (GE Healthcare Bio-science AB, Sweden), C18 reversed-phase silica gel (YMC, ODS-A, AA120S50), Silica gel (200–300 mesh, Qingdao Marine Chemical factory, Qingdao, China.) were used for column chromatography (CC). TLC using silica GF254 (10–40 μm) was detected at 254 nm and spots were visualized by spraying with 5% H2SO4 in EtOH (v/v) followed by heating.

Plant Material

The flowers of C. indicum was purchased from Huanghe Medicinal Material Market in Gansu in 2009 and identified by Associate Prof. H.Y. Qi of CAS Key Laboratory of Chemistry of Northwestern Plant Resources in LICP, where a voucher specimen (No. ZY2009C001) was deposited.

Extraction and Isolation

The air-dried flowers of C. indicum (2.0 kg) were pulverized and extracted with 95% EtOH (3 × 5 L) at 50 °C for 3 h each time. The combined extracts were evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The resulting residue was mixed with H2O (1.5 L) to form a suspension and partitioned successively with petroleum ether (PE), EtOAc, and n-BuOH. The PE-soluble part (60 g) was subjected to silica gel CC with a gradient system of PE–EtOAc (60:1, 30:1, 15:1, 10:1, 7:1, 5:1, 3:1 and 1:1) to afford eight fractions (A–H) based on TLC analysis. Fractions F–G was purified over a column of Sephadex LH-20 using CHCl3–MeOH (2:1) to give tho sub-fractions (F1 and G1) without pigments. Sub-fraction F1 was separated by silica gel CC eluted repeatedly with CHCl3–EtOAc (25:1, 15:1 and 10:1), PE–EtOAc (10:1), CHCl3–Me2CO (15:1), and a column of C18 reversed-phase silica gel (MeOH–H2O, 70:30, 60:40), to give 2 (12.3 mg). Sub-fraction G1A was repeated purified by silica gel eluted with CHCl3–Me2CO (10:1) and PE–Me2CO (8:1.5), and then over a C18 reversed-phase silica gel eluted by (MeOH–H2O, 60:40, 50:50) to yield 1 (16.1 mg).

Characteristic Data of Compounds

7-epi-eudesm-4(15),11(13)-diene-1β,3β-diol (1): White solid;  + 5.0 (c 0.2, acetone); IR (KBr) ν max: 3384, 2924, 1654, 1458, 1064, 803 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data, Table 1; HRESIMS: m/z 219.1750 [M – H2O + H]+ (calcd for C15H23O, 219.1743).

7-epi-1β-hydroxy-β-eudesmol (2): White solid;  + 3.0 (c 0.35, acetone); IR (KBr) ν max: 3323, 2970, 1645, 1455, 1034, 884 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data, Table 1; HRESIMS: m/z 261.1815 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C15H26O2Na, 261.1825).

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 5619 kb)