Literature DB >> 30820619

[Differential diagnoses of biliary tract diseases : Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging].

K Lampichler1, M Scharitzer2.   

Abstract

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE: Bile duct diseases can be found in all age groups and show an increased prevalence in northern Europe. Pathologies range from benign diseases to malignant tumors with very poor survival. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL
METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) are the radiological methods of choice for a detailed evaluation of the bile duct system in addition to sonography. By assessing the lumen and the wall of the bile ducts as well as the surrounding structures, both obstructive and nonobstructive pathologies can be diagnosed and differentiated with high sensitivity and specificity. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Technical developments with postprocessing modalities as well as the use of biliary-excreted liver-specific MR contrast agents improve the diagnosis of bile duct diseases and enable morphological and functional assessment. PERFORMANCE: Due to high patient tolerance, minimal procedural risk in contrast to invasive endoscopic methods and the possibility of three-dimensional post-processing, beside CT, MRI with magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) represents the method of choice in patients with sonographically or clinically suspected bile duct disease and has significantly reduced the indications of diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). A complementary multimodality and multiparametric imaging approach is particularly helpful for preoperative assessment. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Rapidly evolving technology for both MRI and CT represent opportunities and challenges. By understanding the advantages and limitations of modern MR and CT techniques and by knowing the spectrum of bile duct pathologies, improved diagnosis and narrowing of possible differential diagnosis can be achieved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bile duct diseases; Bile ducts; Cholestasis; Diagnostics; Magnetic resonance cholangiography

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30820619     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-019-0503-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  30 in total

1.  Contrast-enhanced helical CT of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Frank H Miller; Caroline M Hwang; Helena Gabriel; Lori A Goodhartz; Anees J Omar; Willis G Parsons
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  New staging system and a registry for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Michelle L Deoliveira; Richard D Schulick; Yuji Nimura; Charles Rosen; Gregory Gores; Peter Neuhaus; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 3.  MR imaging of acute biliary disorders.

Authors:  Yuji Watanabe; Masako Nagayama; Akira Okumura; Yoshiki Amoh; Takashi Katsube; Tsuyoshi Suga; Shingo Koyama; Kohya Nakatani; Yoshihiro Dodo
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 4.  Multimodality imaging of pancreatic and biliary congenital anomalies.

Authors:  Koenraad J Mortelé; Tatiana C Rocha; Jonathan L Streeter; Andrew J Taylor
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 5.  Intraductal papillary mucininous neoplasm of the bile ducts: multimodality assessment with pathologic correlation.

Authors:  Kentaro Takanami; Takayuki Yamada; Masashi Tsuda; Kei Takase; Kazuyuki Ishida; Yasuhiro Nakamura; Atsushi Kanno; Tooru Shimosegawa; Michiaki Unno; Shoki Takahashi
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2011-08

6.  Biliary MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and its clinical applications.

Authors:  Nam Kyung Lee; Suk Kim; Jun Woo Lee; Suk Hong Lee; Dae Hwan Kang; Gwang Ha Kim; Hyung Il Seo
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  MR cholangiography in symptomatic gallstones: diagnostic accuracy according to clinical risk group.

Authors:  Joo Hee Kim; Myeong-Jin Kim; Sung Il Park; Jae-Joon Chung; Si Young Song; Kyung Sik Kim; Hyung Sik Yoo; Jong Tae Lee; Ki Whang Kim
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Digestive and liver diseases statistics, 2004.

Authors:  Mark W Russo; Jeffrey T Wei; Michelle T Thiny; Lisa M Gangarosa; Alphonso Brown; Yehuda Ringel; Nicholas J Shaheen; Robert S Sandler
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Iatrogenic biliary injury: 13,305 cholecystectomies experienced by a single surgical team over more than 13 years.

Authors:  O Tantia; M Jain; S Khanna; B Sen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Recurrence of primary sclerosing cholangitis after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Ivo W Graziadei
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.799

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Surgical approach to benign bile duct alterations].

Authors:  A Alvanos; S Rademacher; A Hoffmeister; D Seehofer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 0.955

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.