Literature DB >> 30820525

Delays in referral from primary care are associated with a worse survival in patients with esophagogastric cancer.

Chanpreet S Arhi1, S Markar1, E M Burns1, G Bouras1, A Bottle2, G Hanna1, P Aylin2, P Ziprin1, A Darzi1.   

Abstract

NICE referral guidelines for suspected cancer were introduced to improve prognosis by reducing referral delays. However, over 20% of patients with esophagogastric cancer experience three or more consultations before referral. In this retrospective cohort study, we hypothesize that such a delay is associated with a worse survival compared with patients referred earlier. By utilizing Clinical Practice Research Datalink, a national primary care linked database, the first presentation, referral date, a number of consultations before referral and stage for esophagogastric cancer patients were determined. The risk of a referral after one or two consultations compared with three or more consultations was calculated for age and the presence of symptom fulfilling the NICE criteria. The risk of death according to the number of consultations before referral was determined, while accounting for stage and surgical management. 1307 patients were included. Patients referred after one (HR 0.80 95% CI 0.68-0.93 p = 0.005) or two consultations (HR 0.81 95% CI 0.67-0.98 p = 0.034) demonstrated significantly improved prognosis compared with those referred later. The risk of death was also lower for patients who underwent a resection, were younger or had an earlier stage at diagnosis. Those presenting with a symptom fulfilling the NICE criteria (OR 0.27 95% CI 0.21-0.35 p < 0.0001) were more likely to be referred earlier. This is the first study to demonstrate an association between a delay in referral and worse prognosis in esophagogastric patients. These findings should prompt further research to reduce primary care delays.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  esophagogastric cancer; primary care; referral delays; survival

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30820525     DOI: 10.1093/dote/doy132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  3 in total

1.  Mode of Referral of Ovarian Cancer Patients: Does it Alter Treatment and Survival?

Authors:  Anas Barakat; Aemn Ismail; Quentin Davies; Supratik Chattopadhyay
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.406

2.  Time to diagnosis of symptomatic gastric and oesophageal cancer in the Netherlands: Where is the room for improvement?

Authors:  N F van Erp; C W Helsper; P Slottje; D Brandenbarg; F L Büchner; K M van Asselt; Jwm Muris; M F Kortekaas; Phm Peeters; N J de Wit
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 4.623

3.  The patient characteristics of esophageal carcinoma following laparoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia.

Authors:  Kazuto Tsuboi; Nobuo Omura; Fumiaki Yano; Masato Hoshino; Se-Ryung Yamamoto; Shunsuke Akimoto; Takahiro Masuda; Yuki Sakashita; Naoko Fukushima; Hideyuki Kashiwagi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 3.445

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.