Literature DB >> 30820440

Prostate zonal segmentation in 1.5T and 3T T2W MRI using a convolutional neural network.

Carina Jensen1, Kristine Storm Sørensen2, Cecilia Klitgaard Jørgensen2, Camilla Winther Nielsen2, Pia Christine Høy2, Niels Christian Langkilde3, Lasse Riis Østergaard2.   

Abstract

Zonal segmentation of the prostate gland using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is clinically important for prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis and image-guided treatments. A two-dimensional convolutional neural network (CNN) based on the U-net architecture was evaluated for segmentation of the central gland (CG) and peripheral zone (PZ) using a dataset of 40 patients (34 PCa positive and 6 PCa negative) scanned on two different MRI scanners (1.5T GE and 3T Siemens). Images were cropped around the prostate gland to exclude surrounding tissues, resampled to 0.5 × 0.5 × 0.5    mm   voxels and z -score normalized before being propagated through the CNN. Performance was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean absolute distance (MAD) in a fivefold cross-validation setup. Overall performance showed DSC of 0.794 and 0.692, and MADs of 3.349 and 2.993 for CG and PZ, respectively. Dividing the gland into apex, mid, and base showed higher DSC for the midgland compared to apex and base for both CG and PZ. We found no significant difference in DSC between the two scanners. A larger dataset, preferably with multivendor scanners, is necessary for validation of the proposed algorithm; however, our results are promising and have clinical potential.

Entities:  

Keywords:  convolutional neural net; magnetic resonance imaging; prostate cancer; zonal segmentation

Year:  2019        PMID: 30820440      PMCID: PMC6384414          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.6.1.014501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  4 in total

1.  Segmentation of the Prostate Transition Zone and Peripheral Zone on MR Images with Deep Learning.

Authors:  Michelle Bardis; Roozbeh Houshyar; Chanon Chantaduly; Karen Tran-Harding; Alexander Ushinsky; Chantal Chahine; Mark Rupasinghe; Daniel Chow; Peter Chang
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2021-05

2.  Diagnostic value of 3.0 T versus 1.5 T MRI in staging prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mayur Virarkar; Janio Szklaruk; Radwan Diab; Roland Bassett; Priya Bhosale
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2022-07-29

3.  Segmentation of the prostate, its zones, anterior fibromuscular stroma, and urethra on the MRIs and multimodality image fusion using U-Net model.

Authors:  Seyed Masoud Rezaeijo; Shabnam Jafarpoor Nesheli; Mehdi Fatan Serj; Mohammad Javad Tahmasebi Birgani
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-10

Review 4.  A review of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer detection on imaging.

Authors:  Indrani Bhattacharya; Yash S Khandwala; Sulaiman Vesal; Wei Shao; Qianye Yang; Simon J C Soerensen; Richard E Fan; Pejman Ghanouni; Christian A Kunder; James D Brooks; Yipeng Hu; Mirabela Rusu; Geoffrey A Sonn
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2022-10-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.