Literature DB >> 30819692

Regional differences in where and how family medicine residents intend to practise: a cross-sectional survey analysis.

M Ruth Lavergne1, Ian Scott2, Goldis Mitra2, David Snadden2, Doug Blackie2, Laurie J Goldsmith2, David Rudoler2, Lindsay Hedden2, Agnes Grudniewicz2, Megan A Ahuja2, Emily Gard Marshall2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Family medicine residents choose among a range of practice options as they enter the physician workforce. We describe the demographic and personal characteristics of Canadian family medicine residents and examine differences in the intentions of residents from Ontario, Quebec, Western Canada and Atlantic Canada at the completion of their training, in terms of practice comprehensiveness, organizational model, clinical domains, practice settings and populations served.
METHODS: We analyzed national survey data collected by the College of Family Physicians of Canada and 16 university-based family medicine residency programs. We tabulated bivariable descriptive results and used logistic regression to estimate odds of practice intentions across regions, adjusting for family medicine resident characteristics.
RESULTS: Of 1680 respondents (61.5% of 2731 family medicine residents invited to participate), 66.3% (n = 1095) reported it was somewhat or highly likely they would commit to providing comprehensive care to the same group of patients within their first 3 years of practice. This percentage varied from 40.3% in Atlantic Canada to 85.1% in Ontario. In addition, 31.5% (n = 522) reported it was somewhat or highly likely they would focus only on specific clinical areas. Most respondents reported it was somewhat or highly likely that they would practise in a group physician practice (93.8%) or interprofessional team-based practice (88.1%), and only 7.7% expected to have a solo practice.
INTERPRETATION: Intentions for comprehensive and focused practice varied, but over 80% of family medicine residents indicated they intended to practise in a team-based model in all regions. Policy-makers and workforce planners should consider the impact of family medicine residents' intentions on policy objectives. Copyright 2019, Joule Inc. or its licensors.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30819692      PMCID: PMC6397032          DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20180152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ Open        ISSN: 2291-0026


  3 in total

1.  Factors influencing rheumatology residents' decision on future practice location.

Authors:  Justin Shamis; Jessica Widdifield; Michelle Batthish; Dharini Mahendira; Shahin Jamal; Alfred Cividino; B Cord Lethebe; Claire E Barber
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2021-04-30

2.  Practice patterns among early-career primary care (ECPC) physicians and workforce planning implications: protocol for a mixed methods study.

Authors:  M Ruth Lavergne; Laurie J Goldsmith; Agnes Grudniewicz; David Rudoler; Emily Gard Marshall; Megan Ahuja; Doug Blackie; Fred Burge; Richard J Gibson; Richard H Glazier; Steve Hawrylyshyn; Lindsay Hedden; Jacalynne Hernandez-Lee; Kathleen Horrey; Mike Joyce; Tara Kiran; Adrian MacKenzie; Maria Mathews; Rita McCracken; Kimberlyn McGrail; Madeleine McKay; Charmaine McPherson; Goldis Mitra; Tara Sampalli; Ian Scott; David Snadden; Gail Tomblin Murphy; Sabrina T Wong
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Modern work patterns of "classic" versus millennial family doctors and their effect on workforce planning for community-based primary care: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Lindsay Hedden; Setareh Banihosseini; Nardia Strydom; Rita McCracken
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2020-09-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.