Literature DB >> 30819621

Rotating-Hinge Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Treatment of Severe Arthrofibrosis.

Joshua S Bingham1, Brandon R Bukowski1, Cody C Wyles1, Ayoosh Pareek1, Daniel J Berry1, Matthew P Abdel1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for arthrofibrosis is fraught with challenges. Because rotating-hinge (RH) prostheses do not rely on ligaments for stability, a more aggressive soft-tissue release is possible. The goal of this study was to report arc of motion, Knee Society scores, and implant survivorship in patients with arthrofibrosis revised with an RH.
METHODS: Thirty-four patients revised with an RH for arthrofibrosis were matched to 68 patients revised without an RH. The mean age was 63 years, 62% were female, mean body mass index was 31 kg/m2, and mean follow-up was 6 years (range, 2-15 years).
RESULTS: The mean arc of motion increased 20° (74°-94°) in the RH group versus 12° (87°-99°) in the non-RH group (P = .048). Two manipulations under anesthesia were performed in the RH group compared to 9 in the non-RH group (P = .2). Knee Society scores increased significantly in both groups (P = .01 and P < .001, respectively). Survivorship free of revision for aseptic loosening at 10 years was 83% in the RH group versus 96% in the non-RH group (P = .44). Survivorship free of any revision at 10 years was 54% in the RH group and 90% in the non-RH group (P = .03). Forty percent of the revisions in the RH group were related to insert and bushing exchanges.
CONCLUSION: In this series, patients with arthrofibrosis revised to an RH TKA had a 20° improvement in arc of motion and manipulations under anesthesia were half as common. However, there was a higher risk of re-revision in the RH group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arthrofibrosis; complications; revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA); rotating-hinge prosthesis; stiffness

Year:  2019        PMID: 30819621     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  5 in total

1.  Rotating Hinge Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Severe Arthrofibrosis.

Authors:  Eytan M Debbi; Kyle Alpaugh; Daniel A Driscoll; T David Tarity; Ioannis Gkiatas; Peter K Sculco
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2021-12-22

2.  Human outgrowth knee fibroblasts from patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty exhibit a unique gene expression profile and undergo myofibroblastogenesis upon TGFβ1 stimulation.

Authors:  Banu Bayram; Roman Thaler; Jacob W Bettencourt; Afton K Limberg; Kevin P Sheehan; Aaron R Owen; Daniel J Berry; Mark E Morrey; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; Andre J van Wijnen; Amel Dudakovic; Matthew P Abdel
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 4.480

3.  Biomechanical, histological, and molecular characterization of a new posttraumatic model of arthrofibrosis in rats.

Authors:  Aaron R Owen; Louis Dagneaux; Afton K Limberg; Jacob W Bettencourt; Banu Bayram; Brad Bolon; Daniel J Berry; Mark E Morrey; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; Andre J van Wijnen; Matthew P Abdel
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Acquired Idiopathic Stiffness After Contemporary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Results Over 25 Years.

Authors:  Aaron R Owen; Meagan E Tibbo; Andre J van Wijnen; Mark W Pagnano; Daniel J Berry; Matthew P Abdel
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.435

5.  Intra-articular celecoxib improves knee extension regardless of surgical release in a rabbit model of arthrofibrosis.

Authors:  William H Trousdale; Afton K Limberg; Nicolas Reina; Christopher G Salib; Roman Thaler; Amel Dudakovic; Daniel J Berry; Mark E Morrey; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; Andre van Wijnen; Matthew P Abdel
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 5.853

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.