Kichang Han1, Ki Woong Yoon2, Jin Hyoung Kim3, Gyoung Min Kim1. 1. Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 2. Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Korea. 3. Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Korea. Electronic address: jhkimrad@amc.seoul.kr.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of bronchial artery embolization (BAE) in patients with primary lung cancer-related hemoptysis and to identify factors associated with hemoptysis-free survival. METHODS: Data from 84 patients with primary lung cancer (non-small cell [n = 74] and small cell [n = 10]) who underwent BAE from 1997 to 2018 for the management of hemoptysis were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 53 patients had stage IV lung cancer. The hemoptysis volume prior to initial BAE was trivial (blood-tinged sputum) in 21 patients, moderate (< 300 mL per 24 hours) in 34 patients, and massive (> 300 mL per 24 hours) in 29 patients. RESULTS: Technical success, defined as the ability to selectively embolize the abnormal vessel, was achieved in 83 patients (98.8%), and clinical success was achieved in 69 (82.1%) patients. Polyvinyl alcohol particles were used to embolize in 51 patients, gelfoam in 15 patients, and gelfoam plus microcoils in 17 patients. Hemoptysis recurred in 20 patients (23.8%) during follow-up. The median hemoptysis-free survival and overall survival periods were both 61 days. In the clinical-success and clinical-failure groups, the median overall survival period was 99 and 9 days, respectively (P < .001). In multivariable analysis, massive hemoptysis (P = .012) and cavitary lung mass (P = .019) were predictive factors for shortened hemoptysis-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: BAE is a safe and effective approach to control hemoptysis, although the prognosis in primary lung cancer patients presenting with hemoptysis is generally poor. Massive hemoptysis and cavitary lung mass are significant predictors of shortened hemoptysis-free survival.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of bronchial artery embolization (BAE) in patients with primary lung cancer-related hemoptysis and to identify factors associated with hemoptysis-free survival. METHODS: Data from 84 patients with primary lung cancer (non-small cell [n = 74] and small cell [n = 10]) who underwent BAE from 1997 to 2018 for the management of hemoptysis were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 53 patients had stage IV lung cancer. The hemoptysis volume prior to initial BAE was trivial (blood-tinged sputum) in 21 patients, moderate (< 300 mL per 24 hours) in 34 patients, and massive (> 300 mL per 24 hours) in 29 patients. RESULTS: Technical success, defined as the ability to selectively embolize the abnormal vessel, was achieved in 83 patients (98.8%), and clinical success was achieved in 69 (82.1%) patients. Polyvinyl alcohol particles were used to embolize in 51 patients, gelfoam in 15 patients, and gelfoam plus microcoils in 17 patients. Hemoptysis recurred in 20 patients (23.8%) during follow-up. The median hemoptysis-free survival and overall survival periods were both 61 days. In the clinical-success and clinical-failure groups, the median overall survival period was 99 and 9 days, respectively (P < .001). In multivariable analysis, massive hemoptysis (P = .012) and cavitary lung mass (P = .019) were predictive factors for shortened hemoptysis-free survival. CONCLUSIONS:BAE is a safe and effective approach to control hemoptysis, although the prognosis in primary lung cancerpatients presenting with hemoptysis is generally poor. Massive hemoptysis and cavitary lung mass are significant predictors of shortened hemoptysis-free survival.