Literature DB >> 30819469

Radioembolization with Yttrium-90 Microspheres for the Treatment of Liver Metastases of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Analysis.

Alexander Y Kim1, Shelby Frantz2, Jayson Brower3, Nabeel Akhter4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To retrospectively assess the efficacy and safety of radioembolization with yttrium-90 (90Y) resin microspheres as a second-line option in patients with liver metastases from pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma that progressed despite systemic chemotherapy and other treatments directed at primary tumors and metastases were treated with 90Y radioembolization at 1 of 3 institutions from 2011 through 2017. Data from laboratory and imaging studies at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after treatment were analyzed. Tumor response was assessed with Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1 and adverse events with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0.
RESULTS: Imaging results showed partial response in 8 patients (42%), stable disease in 7 (37%), and progressive disease in 4 (21%). Median overall survival times after radioembolization and diagnosis of the primary tumor were 8.1 (95% CI, 4.8-12.5) and 20.8 (95% CI, 14.2-29.0) months, respectively. Radioembolization did not produce major hepatic toxicity, and changes in liver enzyme levels were rarely grade ≥ 3 during the 12-week follow-up. The exceptions were 3 patients with grade 3 increased alkaline phosphatase (week 2) and bilirubin levels (week 4), increased bilirubin level (week 12), and decreased albumin level (week 12), respectively. Most reported complications were grade ≤ 2, with 2 patients showing short-term radioembolization-related grade 3 abdominal distention, abdominal pain, fatigue, or ascites.
CONCLUSIONS: Yttrium-90 radioembolization provided a meaningful survival benefit in patients with liver metastases from pancreatic adenocarcinoma that progressed despite previous therapies. Adverse events and liver toxicity were tolerable and only occasionally severe (grade ≥ 3).
Copyright © 2018 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30819469     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.09.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  4 in total

Review 1.  Ablative, Endovascular, and Biliary Interventions for Patients with Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth Anne C Hevert; Collin G Howser; Michael L Gould; Daniel B Brown
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  New insights into benefits of combination treatment with yttrium-90 and gemcitabine in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Alexander I Damanakis; Florian Gebauer; Christiane Bruns
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2020-10

Review 3.  The role of interventional radiology in the treatment of patients with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Aycan Uysal; Emre Unal; Ali Devrim Karaosmanoglu; Ronald Arellano; Turkmen Turan Ciftci; Devrim Akinci; Okan Akhan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Locoregional Treatment of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Utilizing Resection, Ablation and Embolization: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Florentine E F Timmer; Bart Geboers; Sanne Nieuwenhuizen; Evelien A C Schouten; Madelon Dijkstra; Jan J J de Vries; M Petrousjka van den Tol; Martijn R Meijerink; Hester J Scheffer
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 6.639

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.