Literature DB >> 30819038

Estimating Long-Term Survival for Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated with Chimeric Antigen Receptor Therapy: A Comparison of Standard and Mixture Cure Models.

Aasthaa Bansal1,2, Sean D Sullivan1,2, Vincent W Lin3, Anna G Purdum3, Lynn Navale3, Paul Cheng3, Scott D Ramsey1,2.   

Abstract

Patients treated with anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies have shown either sustained remission or rapid progression. Traditional survival modeling may underestimate outcomes in these situations, by assuming the same mortality rate for all patients. To illustrate this issue, we compare standard parametric models to mixture cure models for estimating long-term overall survival in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel). Compared to standard models without cure proportions, mixture cure models have similar fit, but substantially different extrapolated survival. Standard models (Weibull and generalized gamma) estimate mean survival of 2.0 years (95% CI (1.5, 3.0)) and 3.0 years (95% CI (1.7, 5.6)), respectively, compared to 15.7 years (95% CI (9.3, 21.1)) and 17.5 yrs (12.0, 22.8) from mixture cure models (using Weibull and generalized gamme distributions). For cancer therapies where substantial fractions achieve long term remission, our results suggest that assumptions of the modeling approach should be considered. Given sufficient follow-up, mixture cure models may provide a more accurate estimate of long-term overall survival compared with standard models.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cost-effectiveness analysis; economics; oncology; outcomes research; statistical methods: survival analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30819038     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X18820535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  4 in total

1.  Bias in Mean Survival From Fitting Cure Models With Limited Follow-Up.

Authors:  Megan Othus; Aasthaa Bansal; Harry Erba; Scott Ramsey
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 5.725

2.  After 20 Years of Using Economic Evaluation, Should NICE be Considered a Methods Innovator?

Authors:  Mark Sculpher; Stephen Palmer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel vs. Tisagenlecleucel for the Management of Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in Spain.

Authors:  Mariana Bastos-Oreiro; Ana de Las Heras; María Presa; Miguel A Casado; Carlos Pardo; Victoria Martín-Escudero; Anna Sureda
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Cost-Effectiveness of Brexucabtagene Autoleucel versus Best Supportive Care for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma following Treatment with a Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor in Canada.

Authors:  Graeme Ball; Christopher Lemieux; David Cameron; Matthew D Seftel
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.677

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.