| Literature DB >> 30818746 |
Wenrui Wang1,2, Wu Qi3,4, Lu Xie5,6, Xiao Yang7,8, Jiangtao Li9,10, Yong Zhang11.
Abstract
In this paper, the (CoCrFeNi)95Nb₅ high-entropy alloy (HEA) coating with a thickness of 500 μm on Q235 steel substrate was fabricated by plasma spraying. The microscopic results showed that a new Laves phase is formed in the (CoCrFeNi)95Nb₅ HEA coating compared to the HEA powder, and elemental segregation occurs between the dendrites and the interdendrites of the coating, while the interdendritic phase enriches with the Cr and Nb. The phase composition change and elemental segregation behavior were mainly due to the faster cooling rate of the plasma spraying technique. At the junction of the coating and the substrate, the HEA coating bonded well to the substrate; in addition, the width of transition zone was merely 2 μm. The microhardness of the (CoCrFeNi)95Nb₅ HEA coating was 321 HV0.5, which is significantly higher than that of the substrate. In terms of corrosion resistance, the (CoCrFeNi)95Nb₅ HEA coating has good corrosion resistance in NaCl solution. Although the corrosion form was pitting corrosion, the pitting potential of the (CoCrFeNi)95Nb₅ HEA coating was significantly higher than that of other coatings, which was mainly because of the dense passivation film formed by Cr and Nb on the surface of the coating. Once the passivation film was destroyed by Cl-, the selective corrosion occurred on the surface of the (CoCrFeNi)95Nb₅ HEA coating. In summary, the (CoCrFeNi)95Nb₅ HEA coating prepared by plasma spraying technology can significantly improve the corrosion resistance and mechanical properties of the Q235 steel substrate.Entities:
Keywords: corrosion resistance; high-entropy alloy coating; microstructure; plasma spray
Year: 2019 PMID: 30818746 PMCID: PMC6427115 DOI: 10.3390/ma12050694
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1X-ray diffractometer (XRD) patterns of (CoCrFeNi)95Nb5 high-entropy alloy (HEA) powder (a) and coating (b).
Figure 2(a,b) Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the (CoCrFeNi)95Nb5 HEA powder, (c–g) Chemical analysis of HEA powder by energy dispersive spectrometry (EDS).
Nominal compositions and chemical compositions of (CoCrFeNi)95Nb5 HEA powder and coating (at.%).
| Sample | Co | Cr | Fe | Ni | Nb | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nominal Composition | 23.75 | 23.75 | 23.75 | 23.75 | 5.00 | |
| Powder | 23.74 | 24.16 | 23.91 | 23.23 | 4.95 | |
| Coating | Dendrite | 27.28 | 19.03 | 25.95 | 25.71 | 2.03 |
| Interdendrite | 5.05 | 59.91 | 12.48 | 3.80 | 18.76 | |
| Precipitate | 34.62 | 16.78 | 26.42 | 11.29 | 10.89 | |
Figure 3SEM images of (CoCrFeNi)95Nb5 HEA coating: (a) longitudinal section, (b) high magnification morphology of longitudinal section, (c) coating surface, (d) high magnification morphology of the coating surface. DR: dendrites with white contrast; ID: interdendrites with gray contrast.
Figure 4(a) SEM image of the HEA coating longitudinal section, (b–f) distributions of alloying elements by EDS line scanning.
Figure 5Microhardness distribution of (CoCrFeNi)95Nb5 HEA coating.
Figure 6Polarization curves of (CoCrFeNi)95Nb5 HEA coating and the reported HEA coatings in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution.
Corrosion dynamics parameters of different HEA coatings in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution.
| Coating | Method | References | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (CoCrFeNi)95Nb5 | Plasma spraying | 7.23 × 10−6 | −0.37 | 0.26 | 4.13 × 10−5 | 0.63 | [this study] |
| CoCrFeNiW | MA+HPS f | 1.42 × 10−5 | −0.78 | −0.16 | 1.01 × 10−4 | 0.62 | [ |
| CoCrFeNiCu | 1.77 × 10−5 | −0.84 | 0.30 | 2.43 × 10−4 | 1.14 | [ | |
| CoCrFeNi | 9.44 × 10−6 | −0.87 | 0.33 | 2.25 × 10−4 | 1.20 | [ | |
| Al2CrFeCoCuTiNi | Laser cladding | 1.30 × 10−5 | 0.02 | - g | - g | - g | [ |
ai: corrosion current density; bE: corrosion potential; cE: pitting potential; di: passive current density; eΔE: Epit − Ecorr; f MA + HPS: mechanical alloying and hot pressing sintering; g the passivation region is nearly non-existent, is not obvious, or can be ignored.
Figure 7SEM images of corrosion morphology after electrochemical test: (a) dish-shaped pitting pits, (b) a large corrosion pit.
Mixing enthalpy (ΔH, kJ/mol) values of atom pairs and melting temperature of component element (T, K) in (CoCrFeNi)95Nb5 HEA coating [15,16].
| Co | Cr | Fe | Ni | Nb | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cr | −4 | * | * | * | * |
| Fe | −1 | −1 | * | * | * |
| Ni | 0 | −7 | −2 | * | * |
| Nb | −25 | −7 | −16 | −30 | * |
|
| 1770 | 2133 | 1811 | 1728 | 2750 |
Figure 8X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (XPS) spectra of the passivation film on (CoCrFeNi)95Nb5 HEA coating (a) full survey, (b) Ni 2p, (c) Co 2p, (d) Fe 2p, (e) Cr 2p, (f) Nb 3d.