Kelsey L Rogers1, Samantha H Bosman1, Mary Lardie-Gaylord2, Ann McNichol2, Brad E Rosenheim3, Joseph P Montoya4, Jeffrey P Chanton1. 1. Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, United States of America. 2. NOSAMS, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, United States of America. 3. College of Marine Science, University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, Florida, United States of America. 4. School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Florida, United States of America.
Abstract
Hydrocarbons released during the Deepwater Horizon (DWH) oil spill weathered due to exposure to oxygen, light, and microbes. During weathering, the hydrocarbons' reactivity and lability was altered, but it remained identifiable as "petrocarbon" due to its retention of the distinctive isotope signatures (14C and 13C) of petroleum. Relative to the initial estimates of the quantity of oil-residue deposited in Gulf sediments based on 2010-2011 data, the overall coverage and quantity of the fossil carbon on the seafloor has been attenuated. To analyze recovery of oil contaminated deep-sea sediments in the northern Gulf of Mexico we tracked the carbon isotopic composition (13C and 14C, radiocarbon) of bulk sedimentary organic carbon through time at 4 sites. Using ramped pyrolysis/oxidation, we determined the thermochemical stability of sediment organic matter at 5 sites, two of these in time series. There were clear differences between crude oil (which decomposed at a lower temperature during ramped oxidation), natural hydrocarbon seep sediment (decomposing at a higher temperature; Δ14C = -912‰) and our control site (decomposing at a moderate temperature; Δ14C = -189‰), in both the stability (ability to withstand ramped temperatures in oxic conditions) and carbon isotope signatures. We observed recovery toward our control site bulk Δ14C composition at sites further from the wellhead in ~4 years, whereas sites in closer proximity had longer recovery times. The thermographs also indicated temporal changes in the composition of contaminated sediment, with shifts towards higher temperature CO2 evolution over time at a site near the wellhead, and loss of higher temperature CO2 peaks at a more distant site.
Hydrocarbons released during the Deepwater Horizon (DWH) oil spill weathered due to exposure to oxygen, light, and microbes. During weathering, the hydrocarbons' reactivity and lability was altered, but it remained identifiable as "petrocarbon" due to its retention of the distinctive isotope signatures (14C and 13C) of petroleum. Relative to the initial estimates of the quantity of oil-residue deposited in Gulf sediments based on 2010-2011 data, the overall coverage and quantity of the fossil carbon on the seafloor has been attenuated. To analyze recovery of oil contaminated deep-sea sediments in the northern Gulf of Mexico we tracked the carbon isotopic composition (13C and 14C, radiocarbon) of bulk sedimentary organic carbon through time at 4 sites. Using ramped pyrolysis/oxidation, we determined the thermochemical stability of sediment organic matter at 5 sites, two of these in time series. There were clear differences between crude oil (which decomposed at a lower temperature during ramped oxidation), natural hydrocarbon seep sediment (decomposing at a higher temperature; Δ14C = -912‰) and our control site (decomposing at a moderate temperature; Δ14C = -189‰), in both the stability (ability to withstand ramped temperatures in oxic conditions) and carbon isotope signatures. We observed recovery toward our control site bulk Δ14C composition at sites further from the wellhead in ~4 years, whereas sites in closer proximity had longer recovery times. The thermographs also indicated temporal changes in the composition of contaminated sediment, with shifts towards higher temperature CO2 evolution over time at a site near the wellhead, and loss of higher temperature CO2 peaks at a more distant site.
The results of a number of field studies indicate unambiguously that oil residues
from the Deepwater Horizon (DWH) oil spill were deposited on the seafloor [1-7]. Of the total oil released, an estimated
0.5–14.4% was deposited on the seafloor [1,3]. Passow and Ziervogel [8] argued that these estimates were low because
they failed to consider the formation of marine oil snow over the total spread of
the surface oil slicks, which could have resulted in a greater extent of seafloor
deposition. The bulk of the sedimented oil-residue was limited to the surface
sediment as defined by radiocarbon [3], hopane [1,4], and other
radioisotopes [2].The severity of impacts on benthic communities depends on the nature of the
petroleum-derived material which was deposited on the seafloor. It has been
suggested that biodegradation and dissolution of oil in the water column prior to
deposition on the seafloor moderated these impacts [5,7,9]. We used ramped pyrolysis oxidation (RPO) to
assess the biodegradation state of the material present on the seafloor due to the
blowout. With RPO we examined 5 sites in all, 3 contaminated sites, two in time
series and one as a function of depth, a control uncontaminated site and a natural
seep site. Several studies have analyzed the recovery of contaminated sediments and
have shown a reduction in the overall extent of contamination and have estimated
degradation rates. Stout et al. [4] and Adhikari et al. [10] showed reduced coverage of elevated levels of hopane and polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the years following the blowout. Studies by Stout
and Payne [5] and Bagby et
al. [9] analyzed
biodegradation rates of multiple hydrocarbons in the sediment, showing that
biodegradation continued on the seafloor after the deposition of the sedimented
oil-residues. In contrast to focusing on specific petroleum compounds, studies by
Pendergraft et al. [11] and
Pendergraft and Rosenheim [12] employed ramped pyrolysis/oxidation paired with carbon isotope analysis
on bulk coastal sediments. We applied their approach to the deep-sea floor.RPO is an approach to determine the thermochemical stability of organic matter [13]. When paired with
δ13C and Δ14C isotopic analysis, the source of the carbon
can be inferred as a function of thermal stability. The thermochemical stability of
a compound is based on the amount of energy needed to break the bonds, with higher
stability requiring higher temperatures, whereas more labile bonds break at lower
temperatures. The thermal stability of a compound is thus related to its lability,
reactivity, and suitability as a substrate in microbially mediated reactions [14]. Fresh crude oil is quite
labile, oxidizing at relatively lower temperatures [12]. Oil degradation leads to oxygenated and
higher molecular weight compounds that oxidize at higher temperatures [15]. Shortly after the DWH
event, the oil released into the environment was oxygenated [16], consumed by a variety of microbes and
likely converted to biomass, burned, or altered in many ways [15,17-19]. We define this altered and unaltered
petroleum-based product as petrocarbon [3]. Since portions of this material are no
longer amenable to gas chromatographic separation and analysis [15], the best method to
identify it is isotopically, specifically with radiocarbon [20-22]Pendergraft et al. [11] linked
PAHs, an independent oil tracer, to changes in thermographs (temperature evolution
of oxidized products as measured with an infrared gas analyzer) produced from oil
contaminated marsh sediments. They found that sediments with elevated PAH content
produced different CO2 thermographs with C isotope signatures indicating
the presence of oil. Pendergraft and Rosenheim [12] studied the evolution of organic carbon
over time in oil contaminated marsh sediments using RPO. The thermographs shifted
from lower to higher thermochemical stability and corresponding isotopic signatures
indicated increasing enrichment in both δ13C and Δ14C over
time, indicating a transformation of the oil as it degraded in situ. These two
studies show the ability of RPO to detect oil contamination through both the
thermographs and isotopic analysis of the individual CO2 fractions.The purpose of this study is to analyze the evolution of the carbon isotopic
composition of bulk organic carbon over time and the change in thermochemical
composition of sediments at 5 deep-water sites in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Oil
deposition following the DWH oil spill was indicated by radiocarbon depletion in the
bulk organic matter in the surface layer (0-1cm) of sediment [3]. With RPO we examined 5 sites: 3
contaminated sites, two in time series and one as a function of depth, a control
site, and a natural seep site. We hypothesized that: 1) over time, the bulk isotopic
composition of the surface layer in contaminated areas would return to baseline
values, 2) the oil-residue deposited in the sediment following the DWH oil spill
would be more thermally stable than fresh Macondo oil and 3) that over time and
depth the oil residue would evolve towards greater thermochemical stability. The
carbon isotope signatures of the RPO splits were used to infer the origin of the
organic material.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement: No permissions were required as all sites were in unprotected
areas. This field study did not involve endangered or protected species. Oil spill
affected sediment was collected in time series from 4 sites (GIP07, GIP17, GIP24,
GIP16, Fig 1) from 2010–2017 and
analyzed for bulk radiocarbon. In 2015, we also sampled 4 sites that had contained
high PAHs in 2010 as reported by Mason et al. [23]. We revisited one of these sites, BP444,
again in 2017. Sediment from 5 sites in the northern Gulf of Mexico (GOM) were
analyzed using RPO, including 2 of the time series sites (GIP07 and GIP17), 1 high
PAH site (BP444), 1 natural seep (GC600) and 1 non-hydrocarbon influenced control
(GB480) site were analyzed using ramped pyrolysis/oxidation (Fig 1 and Table 1). Sediment samples were frozen upon
collection, returned to the lab, thawed, treated in 10% HCl to remove carbonates,
washed, freeze-dried and ground.
Fig 1
Sites of sediment collection for time series (green), high PAH (yellow), and
RPO analysis (red).
Table 1
Sites examined in this study, measurements performed, location and
date.
Latitude
Longitude
RPO and Bulk
Bulk only
GIP07
Time Series
28.2397
-89.1207
2010, 2011, 2014
2016, 2017
GIP 16
Time Series
28.7231
-88.4096
—
2010–2012, 2014
GIP17
Time Series
28.6373
-88.5188
2010, 2011, 2015
2016, 2017
GIP 24
Time Series
28.7706
-88.3812
—
2010, 2011
BP074
High PAH
28.6995
-88.3812
—
2015
BP278
High PAH
28.7150
-88.3590
—
2015
BP444
High PAH
28.575
-88.5377
2015
2017
BP463
High PAH
28.5140
-88.6005
—
2015
GC600
Seep
27.3645
-90.5629
2014
—
GB480
Control
27.4977
-90.9797
2015
—
Sites of sediment collection for time series (green), high PAH (yellow), and
RPO analysis (red).The Ramped Pyrolysis/Oxidation System (RPO) at the National Ocean Sciences
Accelerator Mass Spectrometer facility (NOSAMS) was used to serially oxidize
sediments in a controlled environment following the instrument protocol for
pyrolysis in Rosenheim et al. [13]. All quartz glassware used in this study was pre-combusted at 850°C
for 1 hour prior to use. An aliquot of sediment, between ~80–110 mg, depending on
the C content, was loaded into a pre-combusted quartz tube, between layers of
pre-combusted quartz wool, and inserted into the combustion oven, sealed away from
atmosphere. Macondo crude oil was added to a small quartz cup and loaded into the
quartz tube. A total gas flow of 35 mL/min of helium with 8% oxygen flowed through
the sample as the temperature was consistently ramped up to 800–1000°C (5°C /min).
Prior to being trapped on the vacuum line, the evolved CO2 was measured
with a Sable Systems CA-10a CO2 Analyzer, which was then used to plot the
thermographs. The CO2 was integrated by cryogenically trapping using
N2(l) over selected temperature intervals based on each sample’s
unique CO2 evolution profile, by routing the flowing gases to different
traps. Ultimately, the samples were expanded into a vacuum separations line,
purified using alternating slurries of isopropanol cooled to liquid-solid phase
transition with dry ice (CO2(s)), quantified manometrically using a
capacitive diaphragm pressure gauge, and then sealed into a borosilicate glass
ampoule. The samples were reduced to graphite using the hydrogen reduction method
[24]. Roughly 10% of
CO2 was diverted during the graphitization process to be analyzed for
δ13C. The graphite was analyzed for Δ14C on the USAMS
instrument (3MV Tandetron) at NOSAMS [25-26]. Hemingway et al. [27] estimated the contamination blank for a
typical RPO analysis on this system was 3.7 ± 0.6 μg C, with δ13C =
-29.1± 0.1‰ and potentially Δ14C = -449 ± 41‰. The blank carbon
correction for δ13C ranged between -0.02 to +0.15‰ and Fm ranged from
-0.002 to +0.002 (Δ14C ~ 3–4 ‰) [27]. Due to the small size of these corrections
relative to the large differences in endmembers in this experiment, the data herein
were not corrected. Bulk Δ14C analysis was completed at either NOSAMS or
the University of Georgia Center for Applied Isotope Studies (UGA) using
conventional sedimentary organic carbon 14C dating and graphitization
approaches [24,28].
Results and discussion
Time series of bulk 14C values
As discerned by increasing isotopic enrichment, we observed recovery of bulk
radiocarbon and stable carbon isotopes in sediments collected in time series
from 4 sites (Fig 2A–2D). In
general, all the spill affected sites showed recovery over the sampling time
period. Δ14C signatures were as low as ~-501‰ (representative of a
mixture of 38% 14C-free petrocarbon and 62% background) in 2010, and
over time returned towards background values which are estimated to be
Δ14C = -200±29‰ [3]. It should be noted that oil-spill affected sites present in a
fundamentally different manner from seep sites (Fig 2A). Oil spill sites contain a surface
veneer of fossil carbon overlying more 14C enriched “younger” C; as
also noted by Adhikari et al. [10], whereas seep sites have relatively uniform 14C
depleted fossil carbon signature through all depths. In addition to the
stratified nature of oil spill contaminated sites, evidence of Macondo
hydrocarbons in the particulate phase in the deep-waterhydrocarbon plume was
found as far as 190 km southwest of the Macondo wellhead [29]. In 2015, the surface sediment
Δ14C signatures of the 4 high PAH sites ranged from -187.1 to
-467.5‰ (Fig 2E) indicating
that not all sites in the northern Gulf of Mexico had fully recovered to
baseline values by 2015. Interestingly, at two of the sites, the sediment below
the surface layer from 1–2 cm was just as depleted if not more so than the
surface with Δ14C signatures ranging from -257.5 to -369.1‰ (Fig 2E). Below that depth,
Δ14C values increased. BP444 (high PAH site) was revisited again
in 2017 where we observed baseline values. We further explored the isotopic
recovery at these sites by using RPO to analyze the potential evolution of the
sedimented petrocarbon from the time series and the high PAH sites.
Fig 2
Bulk radiocarbon signatures of time series and high PAH sediment from
DWH affected sites and natural seep GC600.
A) GIP07 and replicate cores from mega seep site GC600, B) GIP17, C)
GIP16, D) GIP24, E) high PAH sites reported by Mason et al. [23] sampled in 2015
and Site BP444 revisited in 2017. Bulk Δ14C values of
sediment in A-D exhibit recovery back to baseline values, while the high
PAH sites in E indicate that not all sites had returned to baseline-like
values.
Bulk radiocarbon signatures of time series and high PAH sediment from
DWH affected sites and natural seep GC600.
A) GIP07 and replicate cores from mega seep site GC600, B) GIP17, C)
GIP16, D) GIP24, E) high PAH sites reported by Mason et al. [23] sampled in 2015
and Site BP444 revisited in 2017. Bulk Δ14C values of
sediment in A-D exhibit recovery back to baseline values, while the high
PAH sites in E indicate that not all sites had returned to baseline-like
values.
Changes in patterns of thermal stability
Our second hypothesis was that the oil-residue deposited in the sediment
following the oil spill would be more thermally stable than fresh Macondo oil.
The contaminated sites that were run for RPO, GIP17, BP444 and GIP07, all
exhibited thermal CO2 evolution peaks at higher temperatures than the
fresh oil (Fig 3). The
evolved CO2 thermographs from sediment, naturally oiled (seep) and
non-oiled (control), were different from the crude oil thermograph, which
exhibited two large low temperature peaks before ~200°C and tapered off at
higher temperatures (Fig
3A). The thermograph for the seep, GC600, had two shoulders at lower
temperatures, building to a peak at ~460°C, before rapidly falling off (Fig 3A). The petrocarbon
present in GC600 sediment was clearly more thermochemically stable relative to
the Macondo crude oil based on these thermographs. In contrast to the crude oil
and sediment from GC600, sediment from the control site, GB480, exhibited a
single prominent peak at ~370°C that tapered off with two more shoulders at
higher temperatures (Fig
3A). CO2 thermographs from presumably uncontaminated sediments
underlying oil-contaminated sites followed this same pattern yielding a
prominent peak at ~370°C at site BP444 (3-4cm, Fig 3C), as did sediments from GIP07 in 2014
which had returned to background-like values (Fig 2). We assign this peak to typical
northern Gulf sedimentary organic carbon.
Fig 3
CO2 evolution thermographs.
A) Crude Oil, Seep site GC600 and Control site GB480, B) GIP17, crude oil
and control site, C) BP444, crude oil and control site, D) GIP07, crude
oil and control site. Vertical “tic” marks designate temperature
boundaries of isotopic sample collections.
CO2 evolution thermographs.
A) Crude Oil, Seep site GC600 and Control site GB480, B) GIP17, crude oil
and control site, C) BP444, crude oil and control site, D) GIP07, crude
oil and control site. Vertical “tic” marks designate temperature
boundaries of isotopic sample collections.Our third hypothesis was that there would be a change in CO2 evolution
from lower temperatures to higher temperatures in the thermographs as the
petrocarbon became increasingly degraded over time. We found evidence consistent
with this hypothesis in the three contaminated sites, GIP17 (Fig 3B) and GIP07 (Fig 3D), and BP444 (Fig 3C). The thermograph from
GIP17 2010, the oil contaminated site closest to the well head, had a lower
temperature peak straddling 300°C, and exhibited the peak at ~370°C, similar to
the control site. GIP17 profiles from 2011 and 2015 also exhibited the peak at
~370°C, but the peak at 300°C shifted to higher temperatures over time to 450°C
in 2011 and then 480°C in 2015 (Fig
3B). The peaks at 450°C and 480°C were similar to the peak evolving
at 460°C at the seep site, GC600 (Fig 3A), indicating extremely weathered petrocarbon. The
CO2 thermograph from GIP07 2010, unlike the GIP17 curve,
initially exhibited three peaks at higher temperatures, with two peaks <500°C
and one >500°C (Fig 3D).
CO2 thermographs from subsequent years at site GIP07 (2011, 2014)
are similar to the control site, exhibiting the prominent peak at 370°C, and the
loss of the extra mid-high temperature peaks observed in 2010 (Fig 3D). As the weathered
material evolving at around 500°C would presumably be relatively
un-biodegradable, we suggest that this material may have been resuspended.The depth profile collected in 2015 from site BP444 was similar to GIP07 and
GB480, with all depths displaying a peak at ~370°C (Fig 3C). BP444 2015 0-1cm had a secondary
peak at high temperature ~530°C, which decreased to a shoulder at deeper depths
within the core. Considering all the data in Fig 3, we generally observed a peak at 370°C,
the control site peak. Petrocarbon evolved at temperatures below 370°C, or above
it, depending upon its “maturity” or evolution towards a more recalcitrant form.
Changes in the magnitude and temperature of evolution of the peaks indicate
changes in the thermochemical stability of the seafloor petrocarbon as it
matured from evolving at 300°C, (Fig 3B, GIP17) to over 450–500°C, (BP444, GB480 and GIP07).
Pendergraft and Rosenheim [12] observed as we did, that fresh oil evolved CO2 at
temperatures well below 300°C. They observed that over time, as the oil
weathered in the nearshore sediments that they studied, it shifted towards
evolution at higher and higher temperatures. Consistent with this
interpretation, we observed that at GIP17, over time, and with more
biodegradation the evolved CO2 shifted towards higher temperatures.
At GIP07, we believe our sampling effort temporally missed the less weathered,
lower temperature evolving petrocarbon, and that our initial sample contained
more weathered petrocarbon, similar to that found at GIP17 in 2015. Note the
similarity of the samples GIP07, 0–1 in 2010, and GIP17, 0–1 in 2015 (Table 2 and Fig 4). Isotopic results
(below) are consistent with this interpretation.
Table 2
Comparison of bulk measured isotopic values vs RPO weighted average
bulk values.
A paired t-test indicated no difference for Δ14C values, p =
0.259, t = 1.103, while bulk measured Δ 13C values were
significantly enriched relative to the RPO weighted average (p = 0.002,
t = 4.158).
Bulk Measured
Bulk Averaged
Difference
δ13C
Δ14C
δ13C
Δ14C
δ13C
Δ14C
GIP07 2010 0–1
-22.8
-501.5
-24.5
-447.5
1.7
-54.0
GIP07 2011 0–1
-21.7
-237.3
-23.4
-247.5
1.7
10.2
GIP07 2014 0–1
-22.2
-177.4
-23.4
-242.2
1.2
64.8
GB480 2015 0–1
-22.2
-132.4
-22.9
-189.4
0.7
57.0
BP444 2015 0–1
-22.1
-467.5
-22.8
-422.4
0.7
-45.1
BP444 2015 1–2
-21.8
-358.1
-22.4
-361.4
0.6
3.3
BP444 2015 3–4
-21.1
-202.1
-21.9
-207.0
0.9
4.9
GIP17 2010 0–1
-23.1
-445.2
-25.2
-491.6
2.1
46.4
GIP17 2011 0–1
-23.8
-368.5
-23.7
-396.1
-0.1
27.6
GIP17 2015 0–1
-23.2
-237.3
-23.2
-264.3
0.0
27.0
GC600 2014 0–1
-29.0
-915.7
-29.4
-912.6
0.4
-3.1
Fig 4
Percent CO2 evolved from low (300°C), medium (300–500°C)
and high (>500°C) temperature.
Comparison of bulk measured isotopic values vs RPO weighted average
bulk values.
A paired t-test indicated no difference for Δ14C values, p =
0.259, t = 1.103, while bulk measured Δ 13C values were
significantly enriched relative to the RPO weighted average (p = 0.002,
t = 4.158).The percent oxidized by the temperature intervals low: <300°C, medium:
300–500°C and high: >500°C was calculated to determine shifts in the
thermochemical stability of the carbon in the sediments through time [12]. These calculations
were performed using the CO2 data continuously collected during RPO
prior to purification on the vacuum line. The majority of the crude oil, 82%,
was oxidized below 300°C, whereas all of the sediment, both oil-contaminated and
unaffected, was primarily oxidized at temperatures above 300°C, with only 10–16%
oxidized at lower temperatures (Fig
4). Sediment from GIP17 was consistent with our third hypothesis,
with 2010 having the most C oxidized <300°C, 29%, decreasing over time to 14%
in 2015. At GIP17, the percent oxidized at >500°C increased over time from 6%
in 2010 to 28% in 2015. The down core profile for BP444 (2015) had similar
percentages for C oxidized <300°C, ranging from 11–14%, while at high
temperatures (>500°C) there was a decrease in percent oxidized down core from
36% at 0-1cm to 28% at 1-2cm and 22% from 3-4cm. The majority of the C was
oxidized in the mid-range of temperatures (300–500°C) throughout all sampling
years at all sites, summarized in Table 3.
Table 3
Percent of CO2 evolved at low, medium, and high
temperatures.
<300°C
300–500°C
>500°C
Crude oil
82%
14%
5%
GC600 2014 0–1
16%
67%
17%
GB480 2015 0–1
15%
62%
23%
GIP17 2010 0–1
29%
64%
6%
GIP17 2011 0–1
14%
74%
12%
GIP17 2015 0–1
14%
58%
28%
GIP07 2010 0–1
14%
62%
24%
GIP07 2011 0–1
16%
69%
15%
GIP07 2014 0–1
15%
64%
21%
BP444 2015 0–1
11%
53%
36%
BP444 2015 1–2
11%
61%
28%
BP444 2015 3–4
14%
65%
22%
Relative to Pendergraft et al. [11] and Pendergraft and Rosenheim [12], our thermographs were shifted towards
higher temperatures, even in 2010, compared to their initial oiled marsh
samples, which exhibited CO2 evolution at temperatures more similar
to crude oil. We suggest that degradation of the hydrocarbons en route prior to
deposition on the deep seafloor would cause these differences. Almost half of
the hydrocarbons released from the broken well head rose to the surface, forming
a thick oil slick, before sinking, potentially during a Marine Oil Snow
Sedimentation and Flocculent Accumulation (MOSFFA) event [30-34]. Smaller hydrocarbon droplets (<100
μm) suspended in the water, formed a deep-sea plume that travelled southwest of
the wellhead [35]. Both
pools of hydrocarbons were exposed to extensive and rapid degradation while in
the oxic water column from microbes, dissolution, temperature, and pressure
changes [36]. Through
microbial processes, hydrocarbons from the surface and the deep-water plume
formed aggregates or flocculants, which caused them to sink to the seafloor
[1,9,33-34]. Oil degradation was faster in the
water column than it was following deposition on the seafloor [5,9]. Bagby et al. [9] modeled the potential oil degradation
rates and found that the size of the oil compound and aggregated particle
affected the speed of degradation in the water column and sediment; the larger
the particle and compound, the slower the degradation rate. This longer
degradation period prior to settling to the seafloor for the deep-water samples
accounts for the differences we observe between the crude oil and DWH
contaminated sites and the marsh sediment from Pendergraft and Rosenheim [12].The difference in the degradation period could account for the differences in the
thermographs for GIP17 and GIP07. The oil deposited at GIP07 (~90km from the
wellhead), travelled further and therefore degraded more before settling out
than the oil deposited at GIP17 (~17km from the wellhead). This extended
degradation period was reflected in the thermographs by the temperature
differences between the initial sampling years. The thermographs from GIP17 in
2011 and 2015 and BP444 (0–1 and 1–2) from 2015 had more CO2 evolved
at higher temperatures, suggesting they had similar degradation experiences.
Trends in the Δ14C composition of evolved CO2
We observed marked differences between the control (GB480) and seep site (GC600)
due to the presence (GC600) and absence (GB480) of petrocarbon (Fig 5). Relative to the seep
site, the control site had higher Δ14C values over all CO2
fractions, including CO2 from lower temperatures. Evolved
CO2 fractions had decreasing Δ14C values as
temperature increased so that the final fraction was Δ14C = -316.1‰
(Fig 5A, Tables 2 and 4). The seep site had consistently low
values, indicating 14C depletion, with Δ14C ranging
between -881.1 to -950.5‰ over all temperature fractions (Fig 5C). The δ13C value of the
control was lowest in the first fraction, δ13C = -25.1‰, then
increased at the ~370°C peak, δ13C = -21.7‰, before decreasing again
in the final fraction (Fig
5B). The seep sediments followed a similar pattern, with the lowest
being the first fraction, increasing at the peak and then decreasing again for
the final fraction, however, the δ13C values of the CO2
evolved from the seep sediment had low δ13C values across all
fractions, < -28‰ over all temperatures (Fig 5D).
Fig 5
CO2 thermograph and isotopic composition of evolved
CO2.
Temperature interval of CO2 fractions indicated by horizontal
bars. A) Control site GB480: Δ14C, B) Control site GB480
δ13C, C) Seep site GC600 Δ14C, D) Seep site
GC600 δ13C.
Table 4
Summary of ramped pyrolysis/oxidation (RPO) results.
Accession #
Sample ID
Collection Year
δ13C
Δ14C
CO2 (μmol)
Start T (°C)
Stop T (°C)
GIP0710 0–1
Bulk weighted
average
-24.5
-447.5
182.4
OS-132465
GIP0710 0–1 F1
2010
-23.8
-181.8
55.9
125.0
356.8
OS-132466
GIP0710 0–1 F2
2010
-22.0
-315.5
23.7
356.8
396.3
OS-132467
GIP0710 0–1 F3
2010
-23.5
-442.8
20.9
396.3
436.7
OS-132468
GIP0710 0–1 F4
2010
-25.7
-635.0
28.0
436.7
484.5
OS-132469
GIP0710 0–1 F5
2010
-26.1
-661.6
26.0
484.5
534.8
OS-132470
GIP0710 0–1 F6
2010
-26.0
-706.5
28.0
534.8
801.3
GIP0711 0–1
Bulk weighted
average
-23.4
-247.5
122.6
OS-133695
GIP0711 0–1 F1
2011
-24.4
-112.6
20.1
125.0
305.5
OS-133696
GIP0711 0–1 F2
2011
-22.3
-204.0
35.6
305.5
384.8
OS-133697
GIP0711 0–1 F3
2011
-22.0
-289.6
23.7
384.8
436.3
OS-133698
GIP0711 0–1 F4
2011
-23.4
-282.6
16.9
436.3
482.8
OS-133699
GIP0711 0–1 F5
2011
-25.3
-348.9
26.3
482.8
801.6
GIP0714 0–1
Bulk weighted
average
-23.4
-242.2
158.8
OS-133700
GIP0714 0–1 F1
2014
-25.3
-85.2
14.0
125.0
273.4
OS-133701
GIP0714 0–1 F2
2014
-23.4
-104.8
24.6
273.4
336.2
OS-133702
GIP0714 0–1 F3
2014
-22.2
-208.4
31.2
336.2
391.5
OS-133703
GIP0714 0–1 F4
2014
-23.0
-282.0
44.6
391.5
480.3
OS-133704
GIP0714 0–1 F5
2014
-24.0
-352.1
44.3
480.3
801.9
GB480 0–1
Bulk weighted
average
-22.9
-189.4
139.4
OS-133690
GB480 0–1 F1
2015
-25.1
176.9
12.1
125.0
276.8
OS-133691
GB480 0–1 F2
2015
-22.4
-71.6
36.7
276.8
373.0
OS-133692
GB480 0–1 F3
2015
-21.7
-233.9
23.4
373.0
422.0
OS-133693
GB480 0–1 F4
2015
-22.4
-287.2
28.3
422.0
488.7
OS-133694
GB480 0–1 F5
2015
-23.8
-316.1
38.9
488.7
802.4
BP444 0–1
Bulk weighted
average
-22.8
-422.4
95.9
OS-132471
BP444 0–1 F1
2015
-22.7
-215.5
26.7
140.0
381.3
OS-132472
BP444 0–1 F2
2015
-21.7
-379.8
22.5
381.3
458.6
OS-132473
BP444 0–1 F3
2015
-23.2
-482.1
20.1
458.6
526.4
OS-132474
BP444 0–1 F4
2015
-23.7
-619.3
18.5
526.4
586.2
OS-132434
BP444 0–1 F5
2015
-22.8
-624.5
8.1
586.2
760.6
BP444 1–2
Bulk weighted
average
-22.4
-361.4
101.6
OS-133821
BP444 1–2 F1
2015
-23.5
-205.8
15.4
126.0
325.3
OS-133822
BP444 1–2 F2
2015
-21.9
-292.5
22.1
325.3
396.4
OS-133823
BP444 1–2 F3
2015
-21.4
-399.1
14.7
396.4
437.0
OS-133824
BP444 1–2 F4
2015
-22.4
-408.8
30.9
437.0
534.9
OS-133825
BP444 1–2 F5
2015
-23.1
-464.1
18.5
534.9
801.6
BP444 3–4
Bulk weighted
average
-21.9
-207.0
122.2
OS-133816
BP444 3–4 F1
2015
-23.3
-96.7
21.9
125.0
321.0
OS-133817
BP444 3–4 F2
2015
-21.4
-179.2
25.5
321.0
378.8
OS-133818
BP444 3–4 F3
2015
-20.7
-257.9
18.2
378.8
415.5
OS-133819
BP444 3–4 F4
2015
-21.2
-199.9
17.7
415.5
465.6
OS-133820
BP444 3–4 F5
2015
-22.5
-267.0
38.8
465.6
801.6
GIP1710 0–1
Bulk weighted
average
-25.2
-491.6
161.5
OS-132475
GIP1710 0–1 F1
2010
-25.0
-415.2
42.8
123.0
297.4
OS-132476
GIP1710 0–1 F2
2010
-25.7
-402.0
42.1
297.4
368.7
OS-132477
GIP1710 0–1 F3
2010
-24.2
-504.7
29.3
368.7
415.2
OS-132478
GIP1710 0–1 F4
2010
-26.0
-628.1
20.8
415.2
453.7
OS-132479
GIP1710 0–1 F5
2010
-25.5
-635.6
26.5
453.7
801.3
GIP1711 0–1
Bulk weighted
average
-23.7
-365.5
168.0
OS-135128
GIP1711 0–1 F1
2011
-215.7
28.5
125.0
312.4
OS-135129
GIP1711 0–1 F2
2011
-22.7
-293.1
36.3
312.4
374.6
OS-135133
GIP1711 0–1 F3
2011
-23.6
-390.3
49.7
374.6
450.4
OS-135134
GIP1711 0–1 F4
2011
-24.1
-458.0
27.0
450.4
489.5
OS-135135
GIP1711 0–1 F5
2011
-24.7
-485.6
26.4
489.5
802.6
GIP1715 0–1
Bulk weighted
average
-23.2
-264.3
158.4
OS-135136
GIP1715 0–1 F1
2015
-24.2
115.1
22.9
75.0
304.5
OS-135137
GIP1715 0–1 F2
2015
-22.4
-164.0
36.1
304.5
394.1
OS-135138
GIP1715 0–1 F3
2015
-22.1
-311.5
24.9
394.1
444.8
OS-135139
GIP1715 0–1 F4
2015
-23.3
-402.9
33.7
444.8
511.6
OS-135140
GIP1715 0–1 F5
2015
-24.1
-423.2
40.8
511.6
801.6
GC600 0–1
Bulk weighted
average
-29.4
-912.6
176.0
OS-135141
GC600 0–1 F1
2014
-30.9
-881.1
47.0
103.0
346.3
OS-135144
GC600 0–1 F2
2014
-29.6
-911.6
59.7
346.3
444.2
OS-135156
GC600 0–1 F3
2014
-28.1
-950.5
39.3
444.2
503.9
OS-135142
GC600 0–1 F4
2014
-28.1
-936.9
12.5
503.9
539.4
OS-135143
GC600 0–1 F5
2014
-28.6
-898.4
17.5
539.4
802.2
CO2 thermograph and isotopic composition of evolved
CO2.
Temperature interval of CO2 fractions indicated by horizontal
bars. A) Control site GB480: Δ14C, B) Control site GB480
δ13C, C) Seep site GC600 Δ14C, D) Seep site
GC600 δ13C.We expected the Δ14C value of the evolved CO2 at the time
series sites (Fig 6) to
initially exhibit lower Δ14C values due to petrocarbon contamination
and to increase as petrocarbon degraded or was mobilized from the system by
resuspension [37].
However, at these sites, typically the first fraction that evolved at the lowest
temperatures was the most enriched and the last fraction was the most depleted,
similar to the control, in terms of Δ14C (Fig 6 and Table 4). Only two samples deviated from
these trends: GIP17 2010, and GC600, where all temperature fractions were highly
depleted in radiocarbon. Overall, Δ14C values of evolved
CO2 fractions of sediment from GIP17 became increasingly enriched
over time from 2010 to 2011, and then to 2015 (Fig 6A, 6C and 6E; Tables 2 and 4).
Fig 6
CO2 thermograph and isotopic composition of evolved
CO2 for site GIP 17.
Temperature interval of CO2 fractions indicated by horizontal
bars. A) GIP17 2010 Δ14C, B) GIP17 2010 δ13C, C)
GIP17 2011 Δ14C, D) GIP17 2011 δ13C, E) GIP17 2015
Δ14C, F) GIP17 2015 δ13C.
CO2 thermograph and isotopic composition of evolved
CO2 for site GIP 17.
Temperature interval of CO2 fractions indicated by horizontal
bars. A) GIP17 2010 Δ14C, B) GIP17 2010 δ13C, C)
GIP17 2011 Δ14C, D) GIP17 2011 δ13C, E) GIP17 2015
Δ14C, F) GIP17 2015 δ13C.The evolved CO2 from GIP07 also exhibited the trend of decreasing
Δ14C signatures as temperature increased (Fig 7A, 7C and 7E; Table 4). At site BP444 (Fig 8), segment 0-1cm and 1-2cm had similar
Δ14C values at lower temperatures, Δ14C = -215.5 and
-205.8‰, but at higher temperatures, the 0-1cm segment was lower than at 1-2cm,
with Δ14C = -624.5 and -464.1‰. Moving further down core at site
BP444, the evolved CO2 fractions from sediment collected from 3-4cm
had higher radiocarbon values than the first two segments from 0–1 and 1-2cm,
with the initial and final fractions Δ14C = -96.7 and -267.0‰ (Fig 8A, 8C and 8E). Two
samples, GB480 and GIP17 2015 0–1 cm (Table 4) exhibited initial CO2
evolution with high Δ14C and low δ13C values, suggesting
the deposition of bomb radiocarbon that had been sequestered in the terrestrial
environment, eroded, and re-deposited in the Gulf sediments.
Fig 7
CO2 thermograph and isotopic composition of evolved
CO2 for site GIP07.
Temperature interval of CO2 fractions indicated by horizontal
bars. A) GIP07 2010 Δ14C, B) GIP07 2010 δ13C, C)
GIP07 2011 Δ14C, D) GIP07 2011 δ13C, E) GIP07 2014
Δ14C, F) GIP07 2014 δ13C.
Fig 8
CO2 thermograph and isotopic composition of evolved
CO2 for high PAH site BP444.
Temperature interval of CO2 fractions indicated by horizontal
bars. A) 0-1cm Δ14C, B) 0-1cm δ13C, C) 1-2cm
Δ14C, D) 1-2cm δ13C, E) 3-4cm Δ14C,
and F) 3-4cm δ13C.
CO2 thermograph and isotopic composition of evolved
CO2 for site GIP07.
Temperature interval of CO2 fractions indicated by horizontal
bars. A) GIP07 2010 Δ14C, B) GIP07 2010 δ13C, C)
GIP07 2011 Δ14C, D) GIP07 2011 δ13C, E) GIP07 2014
Δ14C, F) GIP07 2014 δ13C.
CO2 thermograph and isotopic composition of evolved
CO2 for high PAH site BP444.
Temperature interval of CO2 fractions indicated by horizontal
bars. A) 0-1cm Δ14C, B) 0-1cm δ13C, C) 1-2cm
Δ14C, D) 1-2cm δ13C, E) 3-4cm Δ14C,
and F) 3-4cm δ13C.Both the level of contamination and the distance from the source played a role in
the recovery rate of an oil-contaminated site [5,9]. As mentioned previously, higher
contamination may slow overall degradation rates, potentially due to larger
particle sizes, which sink faster from the water column [9]. Valentine et al. [1] found consistently high levels of hopane
(> 75ng/g) within 40 km of the wellhead. Similarly, Adhikari et al. [10] found elevated levels
of PAHs < 35km from the well head 3 years after the blowout, whereas sediment
beyond this distance returned to background levels. Because the bulk of the oil
degradation occurs in the water column prior to sedimentation, the further the
oil travelled, the more it degraded [4]. This supports our interpretation of the
differences between the thermographs of GIP07 and GIP17. GIP07, ~90km from the
well head, has three more CO2 peaks evolved at higher temperatures in
2010 than GIP17, which is closer to the well head, ~16.9km away. This is also
reflected in the depleted C isotopes of the first fractions of evolved
CO2 from GIP07 and GIP17.
Trends in the δ 13C composition of evolved CO2
The trends in the δ13C values were more variable than the trends seen
in the Δ14C signatures. Many of the δ13C signatures of the
sediments followed the general trend of increasing from the lower
δ13C value of the first fraction, and then decreasing again at higher
temperatures. The peak seen at ~370°C in the control and several other samples
was often the highest δ13C value of all the fractions (e.g., -21.7 to
-22.5; Figs 5B, 6B, 6D, 6F, 7D, 7F, 8B, 8D and 8F), suggesting its origin as marine
primary production, the dominant input term for sedimenting particles [38]. Overall, the bulk mean
calculated from all the fractions from the 2010 sediments from GIP17 and GIP07
were the most depleted in δ13C, becoming more enriched in the
following years (Fig 9 and
Table 2). Sediments
from BP444 had the highest δ13C values, varying by ~1.1‰ throughout
the core, while δ13C signatures for GC600 were lower than all the
other sediment. The stable carbon and radiocarbon isotope signatures for all
temperature fractions are summarized in Table 4.
Fig 9
Plot of RPO averaged Δ14C and δ13C from each
site.
Darker shades are more contaminated, shifting towards lighter shades of
the recovered time points. Dash) Overall regression (y = 92.295x +
1824.9, r = 0.9187, n = 11, p < 0.0001), time series sediments: Red)
GIP17 (y = 100.06x + 2021.5, r = 0.9217, n = 3, p = 0.0783), Blue) GIP07
(y = 184.68x + 4072.6, r = .9999, n = 3, p < 0.001), Aqua) depth
trend from BP444 (y = 257.42x + 5431.4, r = 0.9843, n = 3, p =
0.0157).
Plot of RPO averaged Δ14C and δ13C from each
site.
Darker shades are more contaminated, shifting towards lighter shades of
the recovered time points. Dash) Overall regression (y = 92.295x +
1824.9, r = 0.9187, n = 11, p < 0.0001), time series sediments: Red)
GIP17 (y = 100.06x + 2021.5, r = 0.9217, n = 3, p = 0.0783), Blue) GIP07
(y = 184.68x + 4072.6, r = .9999, n = 3, p < 0.001), Aqua) depth
trend from BP444 (y = 257.42x + 5431.4, r = 0.9843, n = 3, p =
0.0157).Several studies have explored the potential of anoxic biodegradation of oil
causing enrichment in δ13C of the remaining reservoir. Wilkes et al.
[39] incubated
alkylbenzene utilizing sulfate-reducing bacteria in oil amendments and analyzed
the specific oil compounds at the beginning and ending of the experiment. Wilkes
et al. [39] found that as
more of a compound was degraded, the heavier the remaining compound reservoir
became. Griebler et al. [40] found similar results to Wilkes’ in an anoxic fresh water oil
contaminated site, with specific compounds showing carbon isotope enrichment of
the remaining reservoir of specific oil compounds. Sun et al. [41] found similar increases
of the δ13C of low molecular weight n-alkanes, up to 4‰, during heavy
biodegradation, but found no fractionation in high molecular weight compounds
even during heavy biodegradation. This resulted in no change to the bulk
δ13C signatures of the oil, no matter the level of degradation.
Whereas these studies were in anaerobic, closed systems, the fractionation of
δ13C during biodegradation of oil, in combination with the mixing
of modern surface production carbon, could account for the increase we observe
in the δ13C of the evolved CO2 of sedimented petrocarbon,
the residual of the oil released from the oil spill. The petrocarbon deposited
in the GOM was further degraded than the oil reservoirs Sun et al. [41] studied. Degradation of
organic matter also causes increases in δ13C values in terrestrial
soil systems. Wynn [42]
synthesizes the results from several studies of well-drained tropical soils
where primarily C-3 vegetation derived organic matter accumulated and degraded
down core. The degradation down core caused δ13C signatures of the
remaining organic matter to increase, up to ~ +6‰ [43-45].
Sediment source composition and variation
We calculated the weighted average for δ13C and Δ14C per
sample, combining the mass-weighted results of the individual RPO CO2
fractions; which were not significantly different from the measured bulk
signatures for Δ
14C (Table 2).
From the RPO average we employed a two-endmember mixing model using the
Δ
14C results to calculate the percent carbon from modern and fossil
sources (Table 5). For
modern surface sediments we used a value of Δ14C = ~-200±29‰ [3], and for petrocarbon we
used a value of -1000‰ The results of a two-endmember mixing model followed the trends
of the isotopes, with the proportional contribution from petrocarbon decreasing
over time as the isotope signatures increased. Our seep and control sites were
at opposite ends of the spectrum with the percent C from modern sources ranging
from 11%, at GC600, to 101% at GB480, while petrocarbon ranged from -1%, from
GB480, to 89% at GC600. GB480 is slightly more enriched than our estimated
background Δ14C ~ -200±29‰, which caused it to have over 100% modern
sources and below 0% petrocarbon (e.g. 101% and -1%). The time series sites
GIP17 and GIP07 contain 36 and 31%, petrocarbon in 2010 and decreased to 8% and
5% by 2015 and 2014. The two-endmember mixing model data are summarized in Table 5. To test for
sensitivity, we varied the radiocarbon background by ±29‰ and re-analyzed three
sediments from a range of signatures including: background (BP444 2015 3-4cm),
mid-range (GIP17 2010 0–1), and radiocarbon depleted (GC600). The sediment
closest to background had the most potential variation between 3–4%, while the
mid-range varied 2–3%, and finally there was no difference in the highly
depleted sediment (Table
6).
Table 5
Estimated percent petrocarbon from RPO analyzed sediments using a
14C mass balance with 2 endmembers, petrocarbon at -1000‰
and background at -200‰.
δ13C
Δ14C
Percent Modern
Percent Petrocarbon
GB480 2015 0–1
-22.9
-189.4
101
-1
GIP17 2010 0–1
-25.2
-491.6
64
36
GIP17 2011 0–1
-23.7
-365.5
79
21
GIP17 2015 0–1
-23.2
-264.3
92
8
GIP07 2010 0–1
-24.5
-447.5
69
31
GIP07 2011 0–1
-23.4
-247.5
94
6
GIP07 2014 0–1
-23.4
-242.2
95
5
BP444 2015 0–1
-22.8
-422.4
72
28
BP444 2015 1–2
-22.4
-361.4
80
20
BP444 2015 3–4
-21.9
-207.0
99
1
GC600 2014 0–1
-29.4
-912.6
11
89
Table 6
Sensitivity test for 2 end member model estimating percent carbon
sources.
Adjusted Background
Estimated
-229‰
-200‰
-171‰
Δ14C ‰
Modern
Petro-carbon
Modern
Petro-carbon
Modern
Petro-carbon
Modern
Petro-carbon
BP444 3–4
-207.0
99%
1%
103%
-3%
99%
1%
96%
4%
GIP17 2010
-491.6
64%
36%
66%
34%
64%
36%
61%
39%
GC600 2014
-912.6
11%
89%
11%
89%
11%
89%
11%
89%
The co-variation of the RPO averaged δ13C and Δ14C was
consistent with the C isotope depletion we observed due to the addition of
petrocarbon (Fig 9 and Table 2). This co-variation
has also been seen for particulate organic carbon and plankton [46, 47]. We estimated recovery rates as defined
as increasing isotopic enrichment over time from the linear regressions
calculated from the co-variation of the averaged RPO values of δ13C
and Δ14C for the 0–1 cm interval at the GIP17 and GIP07 sites. Given
the low sample number at each site, there was no statistical significance for
one of the regressions (GIP17, closer to the wellhead), but we used it to
estimate what the recovery rates might be. Of the two time series sites, GIP07,
~90km from the well head had a faster recovery rate at Δ14C = 46‰ per
year (184.68 in 4 years) than GIP17, ~23km away, with Δ14C = 18.3‰
per year (91.6 in 5 years) (Fig
9). BP444 exhibited increasing Δ14C values with depth,
becoming Δ14C = 257‰ less depleted over the 4cm of sediment we
analyzed. The radiocarbon profile from BP444 showed a distinct depleted layer
from 0-2cm overlaying more enriched sediment from 2-4cm. These noticeable layers
indicated that there was little to no mixing or bioturbation from initial
deposition of petrocarbon to sample collection in 2015.Adhikari et al. [10] also
analyzed DWH affected sediments using RPO and found depleted radiocarbon
signatures in the higher temperature CO2 fractions. Additionally,
they found elevated levels of PAHs near the Macondo wellhead after collection in
2013. Adhikari et al. [10] and Bagby et al. [9] found that in highly contaminated areas, their respective
tracers, PAHs and hopane, persisted for 3–4 years following the blowout. These
estimates are similar to our recovery estimates for sites further from the
wellhead, which was ~4 years. We found that sites closer to the
wellhead, with potentially higher levels of initial contamination, took 5–6
years to reach background Δ14C signatures.The slower recovery rates at BP444 could be caused by the highly variable
sedimentation rates across the region during and shortly after the blowout.
There was increased sedimentation in the Fall of 2010 through early 2011
corresponding to the MOSSFA event following the blowout [2], with sedimentation rates ranging
between 0.48 to 2.40 g/cm2/year during the MOSSFA event but returning
to pre-spill fluxes of 0.05 to 0.16 g/cm2/year later in 2011 [48]. The large spatial
heterogeneity of sedimentation [2,33], could
have created areas of higher contamination, which would be indicated by lower
radiocarbon signatures. Even though GIP17 is closer to the wellhead by ~6km,
surface sediment from GIP17 in 2015 was more enriched with Δ14C =
-264‰, than surface sediment from BP444 in 2015, which had Δ14C =
-422‰. Higher contamination levels would have slowed degradation rates,
explaining the lower Δ14C signatures and slower recovery at BP444 in
2015 [1,9,49]. The massive flux of hydrocarbon
contaminated material to the seafloor also reduced the size of the benthic
community as well as its diversity [49,50]. With the decline in these communities,
there was a reduction in the amount of bioturbation in the surface sediment,
which was reflected in 234Th results [2]. The reduced mixing would also lead to
slower Δ14C recovery times at site BP444.An additional consequence of our study is to shed light on the origin of the
sedimentary organic matter to the Gulf of Mexico. Gordon and Goñi [51-53] hypothesized that organic matter
characterized as low-lignin, with high δ13C and low Δ14C
values contributed to organic matter deposited in deep water of the northern
GOM. They suggested old, highly degraded soil organic matter from historic C-4
prairie grasses along the Mississippi River as a potential source of this
organic carbon. We find no evidence to support this hypothesis. The
δ13C and Δ14C values from the CO2
thermograph of the control sediment (GB480, 0–1), closely resembles the samples
from the deeper sediment at BP444, 3–4 cm, and the GIP07 2014 and we suggest
that these three samples are representative of typical Gulf sediments. They all
exhibited decreasing δ13C and Δ
14C values with increasing temperature, contrary to what would have
been observed if recalcitrant C-4 organic matter was present. Recalcitrant C-4
organic matter would evolve CO2 with low Δ14C and high
δ13C values at higher temperatures. The final temperature
fraction of sediment from these samples were similar to or more depleted than
marine organic matter δ13C ~ -20‰ and did not indicate mixing with a
C-4 source with a δ13C ~ -14‰. The primary source of organic matter
to deep water Gulf sediments appear to be marine [38].
Conclusions
Ramped Pyrolysis/Oxidation combined with isotopic analysis of the evolved
CO2 fractions provides valuable insight into petroleum degradation
over time. Hydrocarbons deposited on the seafloor of the deep-water Gulf of Mexico
took years to dissipate. Compounds of low thermochemical stability were transformed
to compounds of higher thermal stability, consistent with the shift from hydrocarbon
to petrocarbon. The time frame of this evolution appears to depend upon distance
from the well head and the distance the oil traveled prior to deposition.
Authors: Scott A Stout; Shahrokh Rouhani; Bo Liu; Jacob Oehrig; Robert W Ricker; Gregory Baker; Christopher Lewis Journal: Mar Pollut Bull Date: 2016-09-24 Impact factor: 5.553
Authors: David L Valentine; G Burch Fisher; Sarah C Bagby; Robert K Nelson; Christopher M Reddy; Sean P Sylva; Mary A Woo Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-10-27 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Christopher M Reddy; Ann Pearson; Li Xu; Ann P McNichol; Bruce A Benner; Stephen A Wise; George A Klouda; Lloyd A Currie; Timothy I Eglinton Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2002-04-15 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: David L Valentine; John D Kessler; Molly C Redmond; Stephanie D Mendes; Monica B Heintz; Christopher Farwell; Lei Hu; Franklin S Kinnaman; Shari Yvon-Lewis; Mengran Du; Eric W Chan; Fenix Garcia Tigreros; Christie J Villanueva Journal: Science Date: 2010-09-16 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Sarah C Bagby; Christopher M Reddy; Christoph Aeppli; G Burch Fisher; David L Valentine Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-12-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jeffrey Chanton; Tingting Zhao; Brad E Rosenheim; Samantha Joye; Samantha Bosman; Charlotte Brunner; Kevin M Yeager; Arne R Diercks; David Hollander Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2015-01-20 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Gregg R Brooks; Rebekka A Larson; Patrick T Schwing; Isabel Romero; Christopher Moore; Gert-Jan Reichart; Tom Jilbert; Jeff P Chanton; David W Hastings; Will A Overholt; Kala P Marks; Joel E Kostka; Charles W Holmes; David Hollander Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-07-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Paul A Montagna; Jeffrey G Baguley; Cynthia Cooksey; Ian Hartwell; Larry J Hyde; Jeffrey L Hyland; Richard D Kalke; Laura M Kracker; Michael Reuscher; Adelaide C E Rhodes Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-08-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Olivia U Mason; Nicole M Scott; Antonio Gonzalez; Adam Robbins-Pianka; Jacob Bælum; Jeffrey Kimbrel; Nicholas J Bouskill; Emmanuel Prestat; Sharon Borglin; Dominique C Joyner; Julian L Fortney; Diogo Jurelevicius; William T Stringfellow; Lisa Alvarez-Cohen; Terry C Hazen; Rob Knight; Jack A Gilbert; Janet K Jansson Journal: ISME J Date: 2014-01-23 Impact factor: 10.302
Authors: Samantha H Bosman; Patrick T Schwing; Rebekka A Larson; Natalie E Wildermann; Gregg R Brooks; Isabel C Romero; Joan-Albert Sanchez-Cabeza; Ana Carolina Ruiz-Fernández; Maria Luisa Machain-Castillo; Adolfo Gracia; Elva Escobar-Briones; Steven A Murawski; David J Hollander; Jeffrey P Chanton Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-04-15 Impact factor: 3.240