BACKGROUND: Compared with receiving medication dispensed in a health center, patients receiving prescriptions must take additional steps for treatment. Few clinics have protocols for ensuring prescriptions are filled. This study evaluated prescription fill rates for chlamydia treatment based on claims data in California Title X clinics and examined fill rates by patient demographics and clinic type. METHODS: We collected treatment information during Title X site audits for a convenience sample of patients with a positive chlamydia test between January 2008 and March 2013. We categorized patients as receiving treatment on-site versus via prescription and matched prescriptions to pharmacy billing claims within 90 days of test date. We examined treatment rates by patient age, gender, and race/ethnicity, and by clinic type, and assessed the median time to treatment. RESULTS: Among 790 patients diagnosed with chlamydia across 79 clinics, 65% (n = 513) were treated on-site and 33% (n = 260) via prescription; 17 (2%) did not have treatment information. Sixty-seven percent of prescriptions had confirmed receipt of treatment. Prescription fill rates were lower for patients age 18 years and younger (47% vs. 71%, P < 0.01) and for patients attending federally qualified health centers compared with stand-alone family planning clinics (63% vs. 88%, P < 0.01). Median time to treatment was similar for patients treated on-site (5 days) or via prescription (4 days). CONCLUSIONS: Delays in chlamydia treatment increase risk of complications and ongoing transmission. Providing medications on-site can improve treatment rates, especially among younger patients. These insights can inform clinic treatment protocols and efforts to improve quality of chlamydia care.
BACKGROUND: Compared with receiving medication dispensed in a health center, patients receiving prescriptions must take additional steps for treatment. Few clinics have protocols for ensuring prescriptions are filled. This study evaluated prescription fill rates for chlamydia treatment based on claims data in California Title X clinics and examined fill rates by patient demographics and clinic type. METHODS: We collected treatment information during Title X site audits for a convenience sample of patients with a positive chlamydia test between January 2008 and March 2013. We categorized patients as receiving treatment on-site versus via prescription and matched prescriptions to pharmacy billing claims within 90 days of test date. We examined treatment rates by patient age, gender, and race/ethnicity, and by clinic type, and assessed the median time to treatment. RESULTS: Among 790 patients diagnosed with chlamydia across 79 clinics, 65% (n = 513) were treated on-site and 33% (n = 260) via prescription; 17 (2%) did not have treatment information. Sixty-seven percent of prescriptions had confirmed receipt of treatment. Prescription fill rates were lower for patients age 18 years and younger (47% vs. 71%, P < 0.01) and for patients attending federally qualified health centers compared with stand-alone family planning clinics (63% vs. 88%, P < 0.01). Median time to treatment was similar for patients treated on-site (5 days) or via prescription (4 days). CONCLUSIONS: Delays in chlamydia treatment increase risk of complications and ongoing transmission. Providing medications on-site can improve treatment rates, especially among younger patients. These insights can inform clinic treatment protocols and efforts to improve quality of chlamydia care.
Authors: Laura Platt; Heather Elder; Ingrid V Bassett; Lauren Molotnikov; Monina Klevens; Erin O'Connor; Dylan Leach; Kathleen Roosevelt; Katherine Hsu Journal: J Prim Care Community Health Date: 2021 Jan-Dec