Literature DB >> 30816725

Can children prioritize more valuable information in working memory? An exploration into the effects of motivation and memory load.

Amy L Atkinson1, Amanda H Waterman1, Richard J Allen1.   

Abstract

Recent research found no evidence that children aged 7-10 years are able to direct their attention to more valuable information in working memory. The current experiments examined whether children demonstrate this ability when the reward system used to motivate participants is engaging and age-appropriate. This was explored across different memory loads (3- vs. 4-item arrays) and modes of presentation (sequential vs. simultaneous). Younger (7-8 years) and older children (9-10 years) were shown 3 or 4 colored shapes and asked to recall the color of one probed item following a brief delay. Items were either presented sequentially (Experiment 1) or simultaneously (Experiment 2). Children completed a differential probe value condition, in which the first shape (Experiment 1) or the top-left shape (Experiment 2) was worth more points than the other items, and an equal probe value condition, in which all shapes were equally valuable. Children were told they could use the points collected to play a specially designed game at the end of the session, and that they would be given a prize if they collected enough points. When items were presented sequentially, significant probe value effects emerged, with children showing higher accuracy for the first item when this serial position was more valuable. This effect was consistent across age group and memory load. When items were encountered simultaneously, both groups showed probe value effects in the higher (4-item) memory load condition. This indicates that children can prioritize more valuable information in working memory when sufficiently motivated to do so. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30816725     DOI: 10.1037/dev0000692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Psychol        ISSN: 0012-1649


  6 in total

1.  Gain-Loss Framing Enhances Mnemonic Discrimination in Preschoolers.

Authors:  Chi T Ngo; Nora S Newcombe; Ingrid R Olson
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2019-08-07

2.  External rewards and positive stimuli promote different cognitive control engagement strategies in children.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Jin; Bonnie Auyeung; Nicolas Chevalier
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-21       Impact factor: 6.464

3.  Attention and binding in visual working memory: Two forms of attention and two kinds of buffer storage.

Authors:  Graham J Hitch; Richard J Allen; Alan D Baddeley
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Socioeconomic disadvantage and ethnicity are associated with large differences in children's working memory ability: analysis of a prospective birth cohort study following 13,500 children.

Authors:  Kate E Mooney; Kate E Pickett; Katy Shire; Richard J Allen; Amanda H Waterman
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2022-03-15

5.  Why does the probe value effect emerge in working memory? Examining the biased attentional refreshing account.

Authors:  Amy L Atkinson; Klaus Oberauer; Richard J Allen; Alessandra S Souza
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-01-28

6.  Task difficulty rather than reward method modulates the reward boosts in visual working memory.

Authors:  Weixi Zheng; Jiayang Geng; Dexiang Zhang; Jie Zhang; Jingpeng Qiao
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 2.004

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.